NY Post: Nets Seek More Depth, get outta here |
|
![]() ![]() |
NY Post: Nets Seek More Depth, get outta here |
May 18 2008, 04:36 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() 欢迎光临新泽西,易 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 7,982 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 6,076 |
QUOTE Thorn said this is a good draft for power forwards and points guards with a couple quality centers. The Nets are looking for virtually everything. "Obviously, our needs are depth and more shooting," Thorn said, noting the Nets also are looking at someone "to guard the rim" after the team struggled terribly on the defensive end this past season. Link It also mentions a quote where Thorn states he believes a good player will be available at 10. Read into that what you will. -------------------- ![]() QUOTE (Bill Simmons) If LeBron isn't wearing a Nets jersey within the next four years, I will walk from California to New Jersey naked wearing only a 2006-07 game-worn Adam Morrison Bobcats jersey. 1. Celtic King 2. M Two One 3. Pegs 4. BasX 5. Master Shake |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 04:50 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Amateur ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 579 Joined: 27-April 08 From: Across tha skreet from dat ol man's crib... Member No.: 20,543 |
Well, if that's the case they should be able to pick Love, Arthur or McGee from Nevada...not to bad. or they can always trade Minnesota for their two 2nd rounders...lol (I'm an obvious Minny fan)...but what better way to add depth than two high second rounders? Minny was talking about trading one of thier second round picks, they might as well package them both and get another first rounder.
-------------------- Experience all this Thugnificence....Baaaaaaassssk in it!!!
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 04:53 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() The High Ayatollah of Slamola ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,958 Joined: 25-June 07 From: NJ Member No.: 33 |
If we take Arthur or McGee at 10, I'm on suicide watch.
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 04:56 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Amateur ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 579 Joined: 27-April 08 From: Across tha skreet from dat ol man's crib... Member No.: 20,543 |
If we take Arthur or McGee at 10, I'm on suicide watch. lol....Arthur's not a bad pick up at 10....McGee is a stretch but he has potential. But your cool if they get Love? Come on Kid, let's play GM and work a trade with Minny -------------------- Experience all this Thugnificence....Baaaaaaassssk in it!!!
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 04:59 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() The High Ayatollah of Slamola ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,958 Joined: 25-June 07 From: NJ Member No.: 33 |
If we take Arthur or McGee at 10, I'm on suicide watch. lol....Arthur's not a bad pick up at 10....McGee is a stretch but he has potential. Come on Kid, let's play GM and work a trade with Minny McGee is too much of a project. If the Nets go that route, might as well take DeAndre. There are better prospects than Arthur to take @ 10. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 05:06 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Amateur ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 579 Joined: 27-April 08 From: Across tha skreet from dat ol man's crib... Member No.: 20,543 |
If we take Arthur or McGee at 10, I'm on suicide watch. lol....Arthur's not a bad pick up at 10....McGee is a stretch but he has potential. Come on Kid, let's play GM and work a trade with Minny McGee is too much of a project. If the Nets go that route, might as well take DeAndre. There are better prospects than Arthur to take @ 10. who else? DeAndre will be gone by #10. Maybe Randolph or Gallinari? What about trading down? -------------------- Experience all this Thugnificence....Baaaaaaassssk in it!!!
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 05:14 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() The High Ayatollah of Slamola ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,958 Joined: 25-June 07 From: NJ Member No.: 33 |
If we take Arthur or McGee at 10, I'm on suicide watch. lol....Arthur's not a bad pick up at 10....McGee is a stretch but he has potential. Come on Kid, let's play GM and work a trade with Minny McGee is too much of a project. If the Nets go that route, might as well take DeAndre. There are better prospects than Arthur to take @ 10. who else? DeAndre will be gone by #10. Maybe Randolph or Gallinari? What about trading down? Wouldn't trade down. A lot is to be done with workouts still, but I expect Rose, Beasley, Lopez, Bayless, Godon, Mayo, Gallinari to all be gone. After that, not sure yet. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 07:05 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() 欢迎光临新泽西,易 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 7,982 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 6,076 |
If we take Arthur or McGee at 10, I'm on suicide watch. I will be the one to watch you...from the after life, that is. Those are reasonable projects to draft if you can afford to take on a project bigman, or if you have no other glaring needs from your wing positions. That removes the Nets from both counts. -------------------- ![]() QUOTE (Bill Simmons) If LeBron isn't wearing a Nets jersey within the next four years, I will walk from California to New Jersey naked wearing only a 2006-07 game-worn Adam Morrison Bobcats jersey. 1. Celtic King 2. M Two One 3. Pegs 4. BasX 5. Master Shake |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 09:18 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 133 Joined: 24-November 07 Member No.: 20,189 |
No to McGee, Jordan, or basically any project big man. Don't know about you guys but im sick of these project picks that rarely work out. I'd rather us take the best available SF/SG with both picks then a project big man. Honestly, if we want someone to defend the rim i'd rather see if we can pry Josh Smith from the Hawks because hes a proven beast of a defender, and has potential. I know hes a RFA, but i remember reading somewhere a while ago that the Hawks, being the redic. franchise they are, are not keen on resigning him because of the money he'll probably demand. Granted this would probably only work in my eyes if we can unload RJ's bloated contract.
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 09:43 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Jay-Z + LBJ = NBA TAKEOVER ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 433 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Jerseyy Waddupppp Member No.: 19,959 |
This is the year of the PG too bad we just got Devin Harris. You can quote me on this, Sean Singletary will be a top 3 PG in the draft and he'll go in the 2nd round. We should take him even if it's as a backup.
-------------------- JETS.NETS.YANKS |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 09:50 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,657 Joined: 17-September 07 From: Bayonne Member No.: 19,874 |
well, since we're officially trying to get rid of Marcus, I wonder if we're looking for a PG in the draft, in a trade, or what...
-------------------- -Sean
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 09:50 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 133 Joined: 24-November 07 Member No.: 20,189 |
QUOTE This is the year of the PG too bad we just got Devin Harris. You can quote me on this, Sean Singletary will be a top 3 PG in the draft and he'll go in the 2nd round. We should take him even if it's as a backup. If we traded Marcus Williams, i'd actually have no problem with another PG being drafted. I think the thing to realize about our draft this year is that we need Impact players regardless of position. |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 09:54 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Jay-Z + LBJ = NBA TAKEOVER ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 433 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Jerseyy Waddupppp Member No.: 19,959 |
QUOTE This is the year of the PG too bad we just got Devin Harris. You can quote me on this, Sean Singletary will be a top 3 PG in the draft and he'll go in the 2nd round. We should take him even if it's as a backup. If we traded Marcus Williams, i'd actually have no problem with another PG being drafted. I think the thing to realize about our draft this year is that we need Impact players regardless of position. I wouldn't mind taking a PG either but no way I would want one at #10 or even #21. 2nd Round if Singletary is there and we don't take him I'm gonna wet myself and blame it on my brother. -------------------- JETS.NETS.YANKS |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 09:55 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() DOGPILE!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin Posts: 5,919 Joined: 5-June 07 Member No.: 13 |
The Nets some better starters
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 10:10 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Capo Status ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,602 Joined: 29-August 07 Member No.: 7,107 |
we need someone to guard the rim? where the swat and boone picks pointless then?
-------------------- You know the deal.
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 11:09 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Hit and Run. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 5,540 Joined: 3-August 07 From: New Jersey Member No.: 6,085 |
Trade Williams for a 2nd, if they really want to get rid of him. I think he still has a chance to be solid.
-------------------- No Pants? No Worries! ![]() QUOTE (GMJigga) Thorns dodging more bullets than the matrix Men's Health is the truth. I can sit on the can and read that for hours. U must be depress, hang in there dude. For the umpteenth time, I'm a girl, not a guy! (4:58:46 PM) ShakeHawks: i like guys |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 11:17 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 3-December 07 Member No.: 20,215 |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 12:14 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 133 Joined: 24-November 07 Member No.: 20,189 |
QUOTE i think they meant like a low post defender... sorta like what collins was. cuz boone and swat are too weak to guard the amare's / howards / brands / boozer Yea, only problem is i don't really see anyone in this years class who fits that kind of role. Granted im probably over looking a bunch of people , but no one jumps out at me as being a strong tough PF. |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 01:05 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Capo Status ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,602 Joined: 29-August 07 Member No.: 7,107 |
QUOTE i think they meant like a low post defender... sorta like what collins was. cuz boone and swat are too weak to guard the amare's / howards / brands / boozer Yea, only problem is i don't really see anyone in this years class who fits that kind of role. Granted im probably over looking a bunch of people , but no one jumps out at me as being a strong tough PF. well, theyre rooks. theyve never been on a workout regimen before, most likely and there bodies arent developed yet. collins was a tree trunk who had weight on him. you're not going to find a guy to play solid post defense that quickly. joey dorsey in the second round? -------------------- You know the deal.
|
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 01:14 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Hit and Run. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 5,540 Joined: 3-August 07 From: New Jersey Member No.: 6,085 |
QUOTE i think they meant like a low post defender... sorta like what collins was. cuz boone and swat are too weak to guard the amare's / howards / brands / boozer Yea, only problem is i don't really see anyone in this years class who fits that kind of role. Granted im probably over looking a bunch of people , but no one jumps out at me as being a strong tough PF. well, theyre rooks. theyve never been on a workout regimen before, most likely and there bodies arent developed yet. collins was a tree trunk who had weight on him. you're not going to find a guy to play solid post defense that quickly. joey dorsey in the second round? Oh god, please no. -------------------- No Pants? No Worries! ![]() QUOTE (GMJigga) Thorns dodging more bullets than the matrix Men's Health is the truth. I can sit on the can and read that for hours. U must be depress, hang in there dude. For the umpteenth time, I'm a girl, not a guy! (4:58:46 PM) ShakeHawks: i like guys |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |