And Haynes/csnnw: http://www.csnnw.com/pages/landingb...-depth-interview=1&blockID=733312&feedID=5212
I'm not sure I really like the Steph Curry comparison. 90% of Curry's shot attempts are jump shots. Bleh. I think Lillard will be better at attacking/finishing at the basket. He's not a skinny fuck like Curry.
So, Fez... For the record, do you like the draft? I'm sure you posted this, but I probably missed it in the thousands of posts.
I like the Leonard pick. I can live with the Lillard pick considering Waiters went in the top-5. Though, I don't think he was the BPA (best prospect available) at #6 (Barnes).
So by "living" with the Lillard pick... Does that mean you think he'll be a quality starter? If not... I wouldn't "live" with the pick.
Yeah. I think he'd do well with a D'Antoni type of tempo. The system will be very important in his development. Leonard in a heavy P&R offense, something D'Antoni specializes in, would put his development on the fast track.
Lillard's pick and roll numbers from college were also pretty good, I think him and Leonard could thrive together
That, and LMA does well here, and those cuts to the hoop to dunk lob passes. Makes me think management may have a small clue.
The Hickory-High system is a common measure of intoxication. When you are so high that chanting "Hickory Dickory Dock, the mouse ran up the clock" repeatedly seems like fun, you've reached Hickory-High. barfo
So we now know this was Allen's pick for a Franchise Player. Sure Barnes' with his personality will make a great leader as well, but when presented with two equal prospects of the same tier, the Blazers chose based on need and got their PGOTF