<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Air Pietrus:</div><div class="quote_post"> Kings MVP </div> Kobe Bryant huh? haha
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Warriorsfan:</div><div class="quote_post">lol u put kings MVP as Kobe bryant Is this game televised??</div> yes, game will be televised on Comcast SportsNet. This is a Kings broadcast, but can be seen in the East Bay on Comcast channel 400 where I live.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Air Pietrus:</div><div class="quote_post">lol I just copy previous previews and make 'em from there</div> <font color="navy">Why don't you go back and edit it? </font>
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting OaktownFunk:</div><div class="quote_post">yes, game will be televised on Comcast SportsNet. This is a Kings broadcast, but can be seen in the East Bay on Comcast channel 400 where I live.</div>Sweet! Thanks for the info!
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Air Pietrus:</div><div class="quote_post"> [*]Beat the Kings second unit. The Kings have no depth on their team whatsoever and can beat their in the second and third quarters</div> haha. i laughed when i read this. the kings have no depth? do u follow the nba? corless williamson, kenny thomas, jason hart, brian skinner? Know there names? No depth U should really look at there team before u say that! The kings second unit has been playing better than there first team in the last two games, which says alot about the bench (not the starters, for the smart alecs who are gonna say "doesn't that say something about there starting 5?").
The Kings have depth, they're just incredibly small so many fans think they're not as deep. Brian Skinner at center can get double/double figures, The Big Nasty / Kenny Thomas at power forward/small forward can provide points/rebounds and can hustle it. Jason Hart should be a decent bench contributor in moving the ball around. Francisco Garcia and Kevin Martin are all right.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting shootingmachine:</div><div class="quote_post">haha. i laughed when i read this. the kings have no depth? do u follow the nba? corless williamson, kenny thomas, jason hart, brian skinner? Know there names? No depth U should really look at there team before u say that! The kings second unit has been playing better than there first team in the last two games, which says alot about the bench (not the starters, for the smart alecs who are gonna say "doesn't that say something about there starting 5?").</div> The Kings second unit isnt that bad...but they arent as good as you are saying either. Mostly undersized players and tweeners, Skinner and Hart are good defenders but they arent going to stop dominant big men or PGs, Williamson is a nice offensive player and Thomas is tough but again wont bring much that SAR doesnt. Not too bad of a unit but there are some pretty large flaws.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Run BJM:</div><div class="quote_post">The Kings second unit isnt that bad...but they arent as good as you are saying either. Mostly undersized players and tweeners, Skinner and Hart are good defenders but they arent going to stop dominant big men or PGs, Williamson is a nice offensive player and Thomas is tough but again wont bring much that SAR doesnt. Not too bad of a unit but there are some pretty large flaws.</div> Where, exactly, did i make them out to be brilliant? they are a deep team, as deep as other contenders benches are. Our obvious flaw is defense, but it has improved since last year. the kings bench is as deep as you will get but they are a little under-sized but as far as talent goes, they are up there with the best. I was just trying to make my point that it is very stupid to say "The Kings have no depth on their team whatsoever". Whoever wrote that must be stupid. Plain stupid. Can u please tell me what players the Warriors have on there bench compared to the Kings? Not trying to start an arguement of who's better, but to say the kings have no depth is stupid.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting shootingmachine:</div><div class="quote_post">Where, exactly, did i make them out to be brilliant? they are a deep team, as deep as other contenders benches are. Our obvious flaw is defense, but it has improved since last year. the kings bench is as deep as you will get but they are a little under-sized but as far as talent goes, they are up there with the best. I was just trying to make my point that it is very stupid to say "The Kings have no depth on their team whatsoever". Whoever wrote that must be stupid. Plain stupid. Can u please tell me what players the Warriors have on there bench compared to the Kings? Not trying to start an arguement of who's better, but to say the kings have no depth is stupid.</div> <font color="navy">I thought this was a troll free zone? The only reason I came to this board it's to get away from the trolls on the other boards. It's one thing to disagree with a person's opinion it's another to make personal attacks on one's intelligence. I'm really really really getting tired of these people. Where's our moderator?</font>
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting shootingmachine:</div><div class="quote_post">Can u please tell me what players the Warriors have on there bench compared to the Kings? Not trying to start an arguement of who's better, but to say the kings have no depth is stupid.</div> #1 Derek Fisher #2 Pietrus who some consider is going to be the 6th man of the year #3 Zarko who is like a Dirk lite #4 Ike Diogu who may end up starting by mid season and that would leave Murphy as our bench PF #5 Biedrens who some consider is going to be a top 10 center in the next few years. I appreciate you thinking you have a dep bench, but IMO your team is 2-3 players deep on the bench. Our team in contrast is 1-2 men deep at every position. You can not expect other teams to know your team as intimately as yourself, just like your comment about our depth compared to your depth is inferior. IMO our bench is going to be very similar to the bench mobb days of Sacramento of 5 years ago this year....
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting shootingmachine:</div><div class="quote_post">Where, exactly, did i make them out to be brilliant? they are a deep team, as deep as other contenders benches are. Our obvious flaw is defense, but it has improved since last year. the kings bench is as deep as you will get but they are a little under-sized but as far as talent goes, they are up there with the best. I was just trying to make my point that it is very stupid to say "The Kings have no depth on their team whatsoever". Whoever wrote that must be stupid. Plain stupid. Can u please tell me what players the Warriors have on there bench compared to the Kings? Not trying to start an arguement of who's better, but to say the kings have no depth is stupid.</div> Redux, I got it man. I'll handle it.
Hey Air Pietrus thanks for the preview thread. BTW, if anybody wants to create preview threads, feel free to do so, because we can always combine the preview threads together so each member can predict their own outcome of the game or add their analysis. Of course, Air Pietrus is the king of doing these things and he puts together a pretty detailed preview. Good job, AP.
Is a warriors fan speaking ignorance in here and then calling for the mods when called out for it?Sad. Shootingmachine has a point though.Compare benches and then with an honest face say the Kings have no depth.The point is someone said "the kings have no depth whatsoever." Thats erroneous. Troy Murphy is underrated. I expect Peja to go nuts, he'll have dunleavy guarding him most. Another reason why Pietrus should just start.
