<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jzrith @ Jul 16 2006, 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Seriously... you guys don't think this isn't 'rivalry'? Bullshit.</div>So Trotter acting like a crybaby like always constitutes a rivalry? Your trying to compare a one time occurance to rivalries that have been going strong for 40 years. It doesnt compare.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Jul 17 2006, 04:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So basically, the Bears and Packers rivalry is number 1, right?</div>It should be. It's the oldest, and they're the 2 most winningest franchises.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrianUrlacher54 @ Jul 21 2006, 12:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Jul 17 2006, 04:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So basically, the Bears and Packers rivalry is number 1, right?</div>It should be. It's the oldest, and they're the 2 most winningest franchises.</div>Except that Vikings vs. Packers is now the bigger rivalry out of the two. It shouldn't matter how old or how much each team has won. It's about how close the series is all time, how close the games are nowadays, and how much the fans get into it. Pretty much any packers fan (or at least the ones I talk to) say that the vikings packers is a bigger rivalry.
