Who's Better: Tyrus Thomas or LaMarcus Aldridge?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bulls' started by ABM, Oct 24, 2008.

  1. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Just noticed that the Bulls excercised their option on Thomas,

    Which caused me to wonder what Bulls fans thought of that 2006 draft day trade with the Blazers. Would you have rather had Aldridge, or are you content with Thomas?
     
  2. dtay

    dtay formely NaKz

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Leading up to the draft I wanted Aldridge, because I thought he gave us what we needed at the time.

    However even though Aldridge atm looks more promising than Thomas, I don't want to write off Thomas just yet. From his numbers in the preseason it looks like he has improved this year and hopefully that will continue on. I still think he has a higher ceiling than Aldridge and it's not as if Aldridge is a real low post option anyway, so hopefully Thomas gets real good in the next few years.
     
  3. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    Well, after two years, it looks like we got robbed in that trade. Aldrige was sensational last season, and I can't see him really having a dip in this season, especially considering the double teams Oden will be seeing in the low post.

    However, I still think Tyrus can be a very good player. He's got freakish athletic ability and still has the potential to be good. Plus, he's only what, 22? So he's still a super young kid, so there's no reason to give up on him yet, regardless of how inconsistent he's been in his first couple years.
     
  4. rosenthall

    rosenthall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,581
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    At the time of the draft, I was split between the two, so I didn't have strong opinions when the trade was made.

    In hindsight, I'd take LMA every day of the week. There hasn't been a point in time since they've entered the league that LaMarcus hasn't been the better player, and he's always been a better fit. Even if Tyrus pans out, he's looking like an Andrei Kirilenko type, which is an awkward fit on our team.
     
  5. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I was calling Aldridge as the should-be #1 pick in that draft and so did a lot of others on here. So far hes proven us right but it seems like Thomas might be poised for a breakout season this season.

    Aldridge is still clearly better. Hard to argue that a tweener combo forward who's done jack in the league so far is better than a legit PF with very good skills. Oh and Aldridge has actually proven to be a good player in the league (and getting better).
     
  6. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    I was strongly backing Aldridge, and I stand by that decision.
     
  7. MJordan

    MJordan JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Aldrigdge is better than Tyrus Thomas at the moment. But, if Tyrus Thomas is willing to try hard and develop his skills who knows just how good he can become.

    All we know about Thomas is that he is an explosive type of player.
     
  8. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Thomas was a gamble - that he'd develop into a studly player due to his athleticism. LMA was a perfect fit for the Bulls' actual needs, and I have no idea why the Bulls didn't keep him. I suppose that the Bulls don't have a marquee player (maybe Rose!) and that LMA isn't and that Thomas might be was the calculus.
     
  9. dtay

    dtay formely NaKz

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Denny I don't think LMA was actually what we needed at the time. We needed (still do) a low post presence and LMA is not a low post player. Don't get me wrong he would have helped definately, but I wouldnt' say he was a perfect fit.

    One thing I'm optimistic about Thomas is that he seems to be getting to the line. We definately need (have needed) that for a long time.
     
  10. kukoc4ever

    kukoc4ever Let's win a ring! Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    144
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I don't watch a ton of Blazers hoops, but when I watch LMA he seems like a jump shooter and a mild rebounder. The stats I look at tend to back this up.

    He's a more effective player than TT right now, but if TT can get his head on straight (if if if) he'll be right there if not better than LMA. And more of a rebounder / shot blocker.
     
  11. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    You're fucking kidding, right? That move (and that draft in general) is where it all started going downhill for us.
     
  12. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    He can play C. We still need a C.

    :dunno:
     
  13. Vintage

    Vintage Defeating Communism...

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    LMA is the better player now.

    That being said... I was on the Tyrus bandwagon back then. Still am now.
     
  14. dtay

    dtay formely NaKz

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia

    He can only play C because of his height. But realistically he can't play the Center, hes powerless, doesn't grab boards and predominantly a jump shooter.

    Also at the time we had Ben Wallace who was our center.
     
  15. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    We hadn't yet signed Wallace, that was later the same Summer. So if we'd basically sat tight, we would have had Chandler/Aldridge/Deng/Gordon/Hinrich, with Noc and Ronnie Brewer coming off the bench. That would have been a heck of a lot better IMO.

    Of course, I wanted to trade a guard and get Brandon Roy, which would have been even better, but on the downside, I wasn't too high on Aldridge.

    In retrospect, the best moves would probably have been to trade up for Roy, use the #2 pick on Aldridge and call it a day.
     

Share This Page