Is Ron Paul "Electable"?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by bluefrog, Nov 29, 2011.

  1. bluefrog

    bluefrog Go Blazers, GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Programmer
    Location:
    New Bern
    I thought he did pretty well in the debates last week and he's held steady in the polls despite being ignored by the media and raising a good amount of money for his campaign.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/your-world-cavuto/2011/11/25/ron-paul-rise-iowa#ixzz1f8b0leVq

    It's too bad Libertarians have to run under the Republican banner to for President. I know more people who consider themselves "Libertarians" than "Republicans". And it seems there is room in American politics for a party of fiscal conservatives yet social liberals.
     
  2. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    It seems highly unlikely that a majority of the people would ever vote for someone who would disband public education and all safety and health oversights in our food, drugs and workplaces.

    How many votes did the last libertarian candidate get?
     
  3. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    They don't.

    It is done purely to trick the Republican voters into thinking they represent Republican ideals, which they don't.
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Where do you get the silly idea he'd disband public education? Or any of the rest of that crap you just posted?
     
  5. bluefrog

    bluefrog Go Blazers, GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Programmer
    Location:
    New Bern
    I don't agree with a lot of his ideas but he seems honest and consistent which is more that I can say for most politicians.

    I also like that he isn't bogged down by partisan politics. He would equally piss off people on both sides of the aisle.
     
  6. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    http://www.lp.org/platform

    I agree with you. Libertarianism is a pretty silly way to "govern".
     
  7. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    "Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education."

    That's not disbanding public education. You do realize the Dept. of Education has only existed since 1979. We clearly had public education before that.
     
  8. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    So, that's what happened.
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Embrace the change. It's the best you can hope for.
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,643
    Likes Received:
    22,674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Certainly sounds like it. If every parent is responsible for, and has control of, the funds for their child's education, that means I don't pay tax for schools anymore.
    If only the parents pay, and they decide where to spend the money, without government interference, what's public about that educational system?

    What's that got to do with anything? The statement above doesn't say federal government. It says 'government'.

    barfo
     
  11. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Note the bold part.

    Also the part you skipped:

    2.8 Education

    Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice.
     
  12. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Control of the funds for their children's education sounds like vouchers to me. And finer control of how the money is spent in their district.

    You do realize there are state governments, right? Public education existed before 1979, and still does to a large degree, as the states' responsibility.

    ABM made the connection between federal government interference and the decline of our educational system (e.g. results relative to other nations).

    Ron Paul would do away with the Dept. of Education (among others). I suppose that's what got Maris to thinking he is opposed to public education or would dismantle it all.

    Yet...

    http://chuck.hubpages.com/hub/Views_of_Ron_Paul_and_Libertarians_on_Education_and_Other_Issues

    Ron Paul takes a strict view of the U.S. Constitution and, during his Congressional career has made a point of voting against legislation that involves the Federal Government in areas not covered by the Constitution. In a nutshell he is opposed to the Federal Government funding or regulating education.

    Ironically, despite the fact that, as a member of Congress, he is opposed to federal funding or regulation of education as being outside its Constitutional authority and, as a political and philosophical libertarian, is probably also opposed to public education in general, he has received a rating of 67% from the National Education Association (NEA) which lobbies vigorously for support of public education at all levels of government.

    While this is certainly not a vote of confidence in Paul by the NEA, it indicates that his position on federal legislation has been the same as that of the NEA more than half of the time.

    ---

    And from the libertarianism FAQ:

    http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/libertarianism.html

    Libertarians don't believe in tax-funded education, but most favor the current "parental choice" laws and voucher systems as a step in the right direction.
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Do you think the private schools do a better job of educating kids than the public ones?

    I rest my case, because if you answer "no" you are playing the fool.
     
  14. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    I'll voucher for that.
     
  15. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Since this thread is about Ron Paul's positions...

    http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/education/

    Ron Paul works towards the elimination of the inefficient Department of Education, leaving education decisions to be made at the state, local or personal level. Parents should have the right to spend their money on the school or method of schooling they deem appropriate for their children.

    On November 14, 2008 Ron Paul said in a New York Times interview:

    “First, the Constitution does not authorize the Department of Education, and the founders never envisioned the federal government dictating those education policies.

    Second, it is a huge bureaucracy that squanders our money. We send billions of dollars to Washington and get back less than we sent. The money would be much better off left in states and local communities rather than being squandered in Washington.

    Finally, I think that the smallest level of government possible best performs education. Teachers, parents, and local community leaders should be making decisions about exactly how our children should be taught, not Washington bureaucrats.

    The Department of Education has given us No Child Left Behind, massive unfunded mandates, indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medication of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should get rid of all of that and get those choices back in the hands of the people.”
     
  16. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    A rose by any other name...

    A previous Department of Education was created in 1867 but soon was demoted to an Office in 1868.[3] As an agency not represented in the president's cabinet, it quickly became a relatively minor bureau in the Department of the Interior. In 1939, the bureau was transferred to the Federal Security Agency, where it was renamed the Office of Education. In 1953, the Federal Security Agency was upgraded to cabinet-level status as the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Upgrading Education to cabinet level status in 1979 was controversial and opposed by many in the Republican Party, who saw the department as unconstitutional, arguing that the Constitution doesn't mention education, and deemed it an unnecessary and illegal federal bureaucratic intrusion into local affairs. However many liberals and Democrats see the department as constitutional under the Commerce Clause, and that the funding role of the Department is constitutional under the Taxing and Spending Clause.


    Functions

    The primary functions of the Department of Education are to "establish policy for, administer and coordinate most federal assistance to education, collect data on US schools, and to enforce federal educational laws regarding privacy and civil rights.[4] The Department of Education does not establish schools or colleges.[5]

    The Office of the Inspector General has a unit of enforcement agents who conduct investigations and raids in connection to student loan defaults and fraud.[6]

    Unlike the systems of most other countries, education in the United States is highly decentralized, and the federal government and Department of Education are not heavily involved in determining curricula or educational standards (with the recent exception of the No Child Left Behind Act). This has been left to state and local school districts. The quality of educational institutions and their degrees is maintained through an informal private process known as accreditation, over which the Department of Education has no direct public jurisdictional control.

    The Department's mission is: to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.[7] Aligned with this mission of ensuring equal access to education, the Department of Education is a member of the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness,[8] and works with federal partners to ensure proper education for homeless and runaway youth in the United States.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education
     
  17. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,643
    Likes Received:
    22,674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Ok, so in fact, Maris was right when he said 'disband public education'. Why are you arguing the point and conceding it simultaneously? Did you not read what you were quoting?

    barfo
     
  18. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Obviously not a fair playing field.

    Private schools do not accept "problem" or "challenged" students. Most do not even accept "average" students.

    And yet, I would say no they do not. They provide a much narrower, specifically tailored education to overqualified and pampered students who never learn the intangibles that come from being challenged by adversity.
     
  19. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    ^^^

    LOL

    We're spending $77B at the federal level on that crap.

    $77B that would be far better spent on teachers' salaries, keeping the roofs of the schools from leaking.

    Or the purchase of 77 million MacBook Air laptops for the students PER YEAR.

    And the bit you underlined is what I posted in #12:

     
  20. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Nonsense. There are numerous private schools for the handicapped and for those with other issues that qualify them as "problem" students.
     

Share This Page