#2 pick Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Fez Hammersticks, Jun 1, 2012.

  1. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,881
    Likes Received:
    9,530
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    Yeah, I'm hoping.

    Option A: Bradley Beal -- He exudes high basketball IQ and intangibles. In a few years he could be that James Harden level SG. Ray Allen-like shooting mechanics. Though, his 3PT% didn't reflect that while at Florida.

    Option B: MKG -- Described as having that "it" factor and plays with a killer instinct. A player who would thrive in an uptempo system and would instantly be your best perimeter defender.

    Option C: Andre Drummond -- True center size, 3-4 years away. Very raw. Oh yeah, he's really raw.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2012
  2. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    33,502
    Likes Received:
    11,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    I like Beal a lot. But, there's no way a team isn't taking MKG #2.
     
  3. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    NBADraft.net has Beal going #7 to GSW.

    Just sayin'.
     
  4. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    if a player falls to us at six it will be drummond or T-robb. I am not on the beal band wagon and will be insanely pissed if we trade the 6 and 11 for the two.
    My mind might change after workouts but right now id take him at six (because id take bpa at six) but wouldn't move much to trade down for him.

    Sent from my LS670 using Tapatalk 2
     
  5. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    My feelings exactly.
     
  6. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,318
    Likes Received:
    1,880
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep.

    At two, none of the two through eight blow my skirt up. For all the hype about how strong this draft is supposed to be, I just dont see it. I keep reading how flawed all these guys are. Oh, and when thetop tow or three guy is labaled as a "project", tell me again this bs fairy tale that this is a strong draft...

    fk it stay with 6 and 11, draft for the BPA, and realize none of these guys are ready to start for a good team, moreless the Blazers.
     
  7. SecretAgentMan

    SecretAgentMan Little League Deity

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Robinson.

    Beal has done nothing to warrant being a top 5 pick, let alone number 2. Especially considering how small he is said to be and how poor his 3pt shooting numbers are. I have a feeling he will be exposed as just another undersized 2 guard when he starts working out against the likes of Lamb, Ross, etc.
     
  8. Wheels

    Wheels Is That A Challenge?!?!1! Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    16,253
    Likes Received:
    807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hood River, OR
    I remember at one point NBADraft.net had pavel podkolzin as #3 overall in their mock draft as well.
     
  9. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,881
    Likes Received:
    9,530
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    I think a lot will depend on how he measures out. Maybe you could play him at the five the same way Atlanta plays (6'8.75") Al Horford.
     
  10. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I don't get it either.

    I'm open to being wrong about him, but as of right now he just doesn't excite me. If you're going to be undersized you better have elite athleticism (like Eric Gordon). Beal isn't at that level.

    [video=youtube;19sRqsD3DYk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19sRqsD3DYk[/video]

    There was no doubt about Gordon's abilities and athleticism.
     
  11. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
  12. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,499
    Likes Received:
    3,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The #2 IMO in this draft is not worth the 6 and 11, unless thru workouts someone really dominates and stand out, otherwise fuk no
     
  13. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,881
    Likes Received:
    9,530
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    I think there is a bit of a drop off between MKG and some of the players likely to be there at #6 (Lillard, Barnes, etc.)

    PG: Dragic*
    SG: Batum
    SF: MKG
    PF: Aldridge

    C: Freeland*

    This is a core I can get excited about -- depending on the new coach of course.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2012
  14. Nate4Prez

    Nate4Prez . . . .

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tempe, AZ
    I wish / hope the Blazers decide they want two players and go after them with everything they got to get 'em. If they decide they want Drummond and Beal they need to do everything in their power to make it happen. I see Beal going 3-5 and Drummond going 4-7, so I don't find it impossible for the Blazers to use their picks, players (like E. Williams, Babbit, and even Matthews if we get Beal) and Allen's deep pockets (cash considerations) to get what they want.

    PG - Dragic/Lowry
    SG - Beal
    SF - Batum
    PF - Aldridge
    C - Drummond
     
  15. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,114
    Likes Received:
    53,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    How do you pass on TRob?
     
  16. SecretAgentMan

    SecretAgentMan Little League Deity

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Neither Batum nor MKG are good are creating offense unless in the open floor.. That lineup would stall so badly in the half court.
     
  17. SecretAgentMan

    SecretAgentMan Little League Deity

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The way the NBA is these days, almost any PF can play center for very extended periods of time. Especially a physically strong, great rebounder like Robinson. The Horford comparison is a good one.
     
  18. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,114
    Likes Received:
    53,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I think he's closer to Josh Smith than Horford. Nic/TRob/LA is a sick front line on both ends.
     
  19. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Physically, hes very much like Josh Smith, who has no trouble at PF. Horford is probably about 260 lbs.
     
  20. Public Defender

    Public Defender brigadier general

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    asking questions
    Location:
    In the shadow of the Mother Ship
    I don't have a problem with trading up to the #2, mainly to take Kidd-Gilchrist. There might be a few other players worth taking that could fall to the Blazers at #6, but in terms of risk/reward - what are the Blazers risking in giving up the #11 pick, if the #2 pick is going to be substantially better than the #6?

    I have to admit, my reasoning is somewhat colored by my pessimism toward the Blazers and their ability to properly evaluate talent (too many blown high draft picks in the last 8-10 years). For that reason, I'd rather take the surer bet on one player - the #2 pick - than roll the dice twice on two lesser guaranteed talents (especially the #11...).

    I'm not necessarily disagreeing with keeping the #6 and #11 picks - especially if the Blazers have better-than-ever intelligence that they've got two really good prospects who are both realistically obtainable at both those spots.

    At #2, you don't have to worry about whether or not you're getting the player you want. You'll get him (so long as it's not Davis, and New Orleans ain't giving that guy up).
     

Share This Page