Sure, he's saying what some of us are thinking, but he's always bee a LOT more professional than to do this kind of thing. amiright?
Funny poeple are talking about this more than the game. We needed a UO v Alabama game. I can see why some think this came across as a "dirty old man" kind of feel. But I didn't take it that way and I think Brent was just building up to the "so if you are a young kid in Alabama, go pick up a football" I thought it was a good build up to that. Brent had to talk about something else than that dud of a football game . . .
I think you meant an Alabama vs Stanford game. You know, so that you actually have the better team there instead of the over-hyped team.
Did you see the game? ND sucked, there wasn't a hell of a lot for him to talk about. Talking about a hot woman to a majority male audience was just trying to keep them from changing the channel during a boring game.
In his entire career, he's certainly broadcast some boring games. I never heard of him being "unprofessional" about his craft like this before.
Brent Musberger is the one who made Jenn Sterger famous [video=youtube;3Pj2zV5FdYU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Pj2zV5FdYU[/video]
LOL. Maybe it's Brent style to comment on gorgeous female college football fans. If this was Marv Albert saying all this, it would have a completely different feel.
I'm going to save this post, and you should save mine. I can't wait until out trip to Palo Alto next fall. You got us this year. We looked at the 21 point spread, and your pathetic offense and took you for granted. Your defense played great, and we don't have a FG kicker, so you won. But next season will be a different story. We will got back to beating you 50-30 like we usually do, and order will be restored. "Overhyped"? Go ask Andrew Luck about how "overhyped" Oregon is pal.
Oregon would've gotten woop'd just as badly as ND did. SEC ALL DAY The real championship game was on December 1st.
I actually think they have a case for being #2 at the end of the year. I don't like making excuses, but did you see how incredibly bad our qb, Nunes, was for the first half of the year when we had our two losses? He was absolutely terrible. Stanford was winning despite him being at qb. Stanford was a completely different team once Hogan got the start and playing time. There is little doubt they win both the UW and the ND losses with Hogan.
I'm surprised that so many UO fans make it down to Palo Alto for the game. I didn't think Walmart would let so many of UO grads have the day off. Oregon got beat this year the same way they lose every year. They aren't built to handle big, fast, physical defenses. When they face a big, fast, physical defense, the ducks in their little prissy, flashy, overhyped uniforms get manhandled by the real men. Just look at what has happened when Oregon has faced the physical, tough defenses of Auburn, LSU and Stanford lately. If you had watched the games this year, you wouldn't have been surprised that Stanford's offense was actually legit once they replaced Nunes with Hogan at quarterback. That's unfortunate your team was dumb enough to "look at the 21 point spread" and not look at the actual team that was put on the field.
....and Wisconsin and the Stanford teams of the past couple of years. Stanford has a whole lot of shit go right for them to squeak out that win.
You beat us by 3 points in OT and you think we're overhyped? Who lost to a team that got absolutely crushed by Bama?
