ESPN's summer forecast predicts the Blazers to finish 4th in the West @ 51-31

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SlyPokerDog, Aug 12, 2014.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,467
    Likes Received:
    114,469
    Trophy Points:
    115
    [TWEET]499246505228644354[/TWEET]
     
  2. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,467
    Likes Received:
    114,469
    Trophy Points:
    115
  3. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,467
    Likes Received:
    114,469
    Trophy Points:
    115
  4. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Sad Panda Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,914
    Likes Received:
    5,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    Can't complain with that
     
  5. Boise Blazer

    Boise Blazer Thread Lightly

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,241
    Likes Received:
    2,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So lost a little in this is that they are predicting that the 4th place team will win 51 games!!!! The west is going to be crazy this year.
     
  6. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    18,882
    Likes Received:
    15,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
  7. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Remember Blazers one 54 games last year and only finished 5th.

    With 51 games, they would have barely made the playoffs.
     
  8. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,227
    Likes Received:
    54,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I think the thought is that more competition in the middle of the WC (LAL/NO/PHX/GS/etc all will be better this year), so win totals will be deflated. TBH, I thought that would happen last year, but injuries changed that.
     
  9. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,236
    Likes Received:
    23,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Also the West won't feast on the East quite as much in the coming season, when last year there were Miami, Indiana and scrubs.
     
  10. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,892
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    It should be another exciting and interesting season.
     
  11. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hmm... I'm not sure what to make of the East. The ONLY two teams that gave the West fits last season, the Heat and the Pacers, have both gotten a LOT weaker, but overall, there will be more parity in the East this coming season. Still, I think the Cavs would be the ONLY Eastern Conference team that would be a lock to make the playoffs if they were in the Western Conference. Perhaps fewer truly awful teams in the East this year, but outside of Cleveland, I'm seeing a whole lot of mediocrity.

    BNM
     
  12. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, they actually have all four of the top teams winning fewer games this year than the last:

    OKC from 59 to 58
    SAS from 62 to 57
    LAC from 57 to 56
    POR from 54 to 51

    The complete results aren't posted yet, but they also have HOU, GSW and MEM all winning less than 50 games this season. Looks like they are expecting much more parity in the league, over all, this season.

    BNM
     
  13. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,227
    Likes Received:
    54,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Ya I know it's a big "if," but DRose is back and healthy, man. If he stays that way, they'll be nasty. Their lineup is sick and Thibs is a monster. I'd put them in the top 4 if they played in the west
     
  14. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed, it's a BIG if on DRose. IF he can be healthy and IF he can return to his former level of play. He only played 49 games over the past three seasons and hasn't played at an elite level since 2010-11. He'll have to prove he's really and truly back for me to take Chicago seriously as a contender.

    BNM
     
  15. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,227
    Likes Received:
    54,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    They updated the rest of the west:

    1. OKC
    2. SAS
    3. LAC
    4. POR
    5. DAL
    6. MEM
    7. GSW
    8. HOU

    DAL being a bit overrated here.
     
  16. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed. I don't get the Dallas love. They are the ONLY Western Conference team they predict will win more games this year than last. Granted, it's only a 1-game improvement, but it lacks consistency when they predict all the other top 8 will lose more games this year than last.

    BNM
     
  17. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    13,177
    Likes Received:
    3,991
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
    #4 sounds good to me! Home court in the first round!
     
  18. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Dallas' starting 5: D. Harris, M. Ellis, C. Parsons, D. Nowitzki, T. Chandler. Seems pretty solid, tho Harris is a shadow of what he once was.
     
  19. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    It's decent--it would have been a great starting lineup several years ago. Nowitzki is still a hell of a player, but he's declined from his prime. Chandler is still a good defender but he also is declining. Harris, as you said. Ellis has fit in well but, like everyone in that lineup currently other than Chandler, plays weak to no defense.

    It should be a relatively potent offensive lineup but a declining Chandler won't be able to drag them across the finish line on the defensive end. I think they'll be in the 7/8 seed mix.
     
  20. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Parsons is better than average defending SFs. Harris gave up a 13.6 PER for opposing PGs and 11.4 for opposing SGs last season. Seems like good defense to me. Ellis gave up a 12.9 PER to opposing SGs.

    But 82games.com is really messed up. It's hard to tell if the numbers are legit.
     

Share This Page