Should Brook have been disqualified for his constant holding of Porter?

Discussion in 'Boxing' started by truebluefan, Aug 18, 2014.

?

Should Brook have been disqualified for his constant holding of Porter?

  1. Yes

    1 vote(s)
    100.0%

  2. No

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Moderators: 1

Moderators

  1. speeds
  1. truebluefan

    truebluefan Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    212,768
    Likes Received:
    821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Should Brook have been disqualified for his constant holding of Porter?
     
    truebluefan, Aug 18, 2014
    #1
  2. speeds

    speeds $2.50 highball, $1.50 beer Staff Member Administrator GFX Team

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    39,335
    Likes Received:
    3,320
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    John Ruiz used to make me nuts with his hugging. Referees need to be more proactive when it comes to excessive clinching.
     
    speeds, Aug 18, 2014
    #2
  3. truebluefan

    truebluefan Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    212,768
    Likes Received:
    821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That has always been a part of boxing. That being said, there needs to be a rule adapted that wont allow some referees to call it, and some don't.
     
    truebluefan, Aug 18, 2014
    #3

Share This Page