I'd have to say Gallery. I watched him in 4-5 games this year, and he dominated. Nothing is a sure bet (ask the Packers), but when you are talking about a lineman that can dominate enough to be considered at #4, it is tough to pass up. While there may be a little disagreement on who they should take, no one is talking that this will be too high to take him. Taylor is not necessarily a bad pick, but I would have to take Gallery.
Nice Argument i still think that the OL n spopts are overrated......................altho u cant win w/o one taking a more skillecd player i would rather
Who knows!! They NFL braintrusts go round and round on this type of stuff. You need a franchise QB....then you don't. OL is the new idea. The Pats didn't have any high-profile WRs. They did have a decent QB, but their RB was so good that they cut him without a quiver. They figure they have a good enough OL that they can pay smaller bucks to a "lesser" back that can have success. I think NY could move down a few spots and still get either one, which would be ideal. As a Cowboys fan I hope the one they pick is a bust.....but they both look like good picks to me.
yea your praying just remember they are only 1 year removed from the playoffs with the giants when they are the underdogs they win when they are expected of sumthin they fall flat on there faces they have not made the playoffs 2 years in a row in 4 ever even years are good for them watch them do bad in 2005