Recent content by new22

↑

Hair is one thing, but does this guy ever smile? Is he always sad or is it Kawhian behavior?

Keon Johnson is a project, Ant was a project and Noah Vonleh was a project. Sharpe is high lottery pick with talent and body ready to work with. There is no reason to think low about him. He is not 22nd pick, ffs. As a lottery pick, he should be in starting lineup after this season. Blazers...

I like to think, that he really should be drafted in first 3, but draft was deep, so teams just preferred not to gamble. Can't wait to see him playing, cos he looks ready to go. He will be monster.

If Dame will be mvp shinig till Dec, Blazers should at least try to get him and land that chip next three years.

Billups is X factor of this team now and he looks laid back on this Sirius video, but this season gonna be all on him:) So I am guessing, that saying "this is not a championship team" is what he needs to say. As for offseason grade: incomplete. They could trade Lillard for picks and go full...

I guess it is all on Lillard. I am not fan of his contact, but he deserves to show, where Blazers can go with him AND actual coach. This season roster seems to be on the same level as every other roster for last seven years, but there are defenders and I hope I will finally see hunger. I don't...

Would you prefer Danny's style of rebuilding? If he was in Portland he would most probably trade Lillard and we have: Ant, Little, Sharpe, Watford, Walker, Brown, Johnson + two young talents and 5draft picks. That could be fun. Cronin is mixing yougs with vets and this season could really be...

They would probably win it all and the story would be inspiration for hundreds of years. Can't imagine how would they stay alive on vet min. Bread and water. Nightmare:)

Sorry to hear that. I just don't see the logic here, that's all.

Ok, so it is unrealistic to expect players to take paycuts to have more chance to win the championship. IF they took paycuts, they could win, but they don't want it more than money. I don't blame them, that is the right choice in my opinion. Case closed here.

Last question then. IF Dame took 25, not 40, and Ant took 10, not 20, and Nurk took half too - would Blazers have money to add another good player?

So, there is no money left now. Would there be any money left if players had smaller contracts? Really, I am stupid here.

Sorry, that's not, what I'm asking. So let me try again. If Blazers have 100%, how does it make no difference for support roster signings if they spend 35% or 25% on one Dame. Simply put one guys says: "If Dame take less money, there is more money in the cup, so Blazers can "buy" better support...

I think the problem most people have here is simple. People think this: We got 120mil to spend on a roster. If Dame take 60, we got 60 left for rest of the roster. If He take 40, we got 80 and it looks much better. What you're saying is, having 60 and 80 does not make any difference. I've never...