But you're missing the point: we wouldn't be paying more. We'd be paying Keegan what we signed Kris to. Sacramento would be the one overpaying even more than they currently are. Of course, this requires us kidnapping their dogs to make them go along with the plan. I'm fine-tuning it.
Imagine (and it'll take a good leap) all of our injured list were as healthy as they can be (given age and injury history). Who wins if the injured list took on the currently active players? The injured list is all PGs and Cs (and Tisse), whereas the active group is basically all wings.
Nobody's going to give up on a promising 2025 draft pick yet. So no Jase Richardson, no Murray-Boyles, and absolutely no Cedric Coward. Those ships sailed.
Unless.... we're involved in a Giannis-to-Orlando trade and the Bucks would rather have one of their picks instead of Jase.
They were showing them on YouTube and Roku but since Yang's been playing they've switched to ESPN+ so I can't watch. Was Rupert the best player on the floor? What about Walter Clayton Jr? Blake Hinson? Harkless?
Bad news guys: Rupert is better at everything than Dillon Jones.
Blake Hinson is still the better scorer, though.
Rupert is also way better than CODY WILLIAMS, so eat crow you guys who wanted to draft him.
Somebody explain EXACTLY what we have of Milwaukee's. Is it picks? Is it swaps? What years? What protections? Is it really that valuable to Milwaukee? Doesn't that depend what they get for Giannis? I mean, they beat Detroit in Detroit without him...
OKC throws in a few picks to the Bucks (perhaps the Clippers' pick this year?)
Why would OKC do this, given how well Hartenstein has played for them? Well, Bam is better, and also I read somewhere that there's some salary quirk that means they would not be able to re-sign him at the end of...