- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 126,476
- Likes
- 146,922
- Points
- 115
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is that relevant?How many Democrats think the DNC should nominate someone other than Biden? Less I’m guessing. Maybe self awareness is a good thing?
I'd really be curious to see how many registered Republicans (or formerly up until the past 4 years) there are in this forum, and how many (like myself) would want someone other than Trump. Honestly, I'm surprised the number is as low as 23%. Then again, I'm also amazed by how much pro-Trump commentary I see from my Facebook friends, so...![]()
I would think that the % is just as high for Biden if not higher only because of he does seem not to be very sharp and on top of it. Sort of like the guy he's running against. I do think the pressure is exposing Joe's age which I totally understand.
Not sure I agree with that, I think democrats have always been better at voting party lines because of unions and social issues. I grew up in a die hard union/dem family and they basically go to their graves voting straight tickets. Im the one exception.23% of them might, but they'll still vote for him. Republicans are good at voting party line. Democrats aren't
This is what Im talking about. Its either lack of preparation of material or not quick enough to catch and correct himself. Its not his fault but his age.I would think that the % is just as high for Biden if not higher only because of he does seem not to be very sharp and on top of it. Sort of like the guy he's running against. I do think the pressure is exposing Joe's age which I totally understand.
I'd really be curious to see how many registered Republicans (or formerly up until the past 4 years) there are in this forum, and how many (like myself) would want someone other than Trump. Honestly, I'm surprised the number is as low as 23%. Then again, I'm also amazed by how much pro-Trump commentary I see from my Facebook friends, so...![]()
Not sure I agree with that, I think democrats have always been better at voting party lines because of unions and social issues. I grew up in a die hard union/dem family and they basically go to their graves voting straight tickets. Im the one exception.
23% of them might, but they'll still vote for him. Republicans are good at voting party line. Democrats aren't
Not sure I agree with that, I think democrats have always been better at voting party lines because of unions and social issues. I grew up in a die hard union/dem family and they basically go to their graves voting straight tickets. Im the one exception.
Not necessarily. Sounds like several of the non-Trump-fan Republicans (or semi-republicans) in here are (like me) basically voting "none of the above".23% of them might, but they'll still vote for him. Republicans are good at voting party line. Democrats aren't
That's my fear come November...often times, the people who did not vote are the ones complaining about who is elected.
I would call him overweight, but that's maybe just me.I’d fit in the category of former Republicans who want someone other than Trump. His fans would call me a RINO, which is funny because that’s what I would call Trump.
That's my fear come November...often times, the people who did not vote are the ones complaining about who is elected.
I, started watching a great show last night from Oliver Stone. First couple of episodes focused on WWII and by the end of the second episode it was all about how the Dems were basically eating themselves alive from within with the Truman Wallace VP elections, so i'm not so sure Julius is that far off the mark on this.
If you haven't watched it, I recommend it. So far, it has brought many angles that are not typically discussed or taught.
https://www.netflix.com/title/80127995
Not necessarily. Sounds like several of the non-Trump-fan Republicans (or semi-republicans) in here are (like me) basically voting "none of the above".
I've only been able to vote for prez since 2000. I did vote Bush both times, and (I think, I'm not certain) have gone minor party every time since.Here's my thought process. Since 1992, I've voted for 1 of the Democratic candidates. Obama in 08. The rest I just thought were bad candidates (or in the case of Obama in 12, I didn't worry about him losing and I went...actually i forget who I voted for. I usually do a write in).
In the 4 elections that Gordon Smith ran vs a D, I voted for him because twice as I liked that he put Oregon first. I wasn't a fan of the D candidates until Merkley.
I've only been able to vote for prez since 2000. I did vote Bush both times, and (I think, I'm not certain) have gone minor party every time since.
My wife was angry with me when Merkley beat Smith because I vote for Brownlow, who received more votes in that race than Merkley's margin of victory, so she basically blamed me (and people like me) for Smith losing his seat.
If vote my mail is approved I think that dooms treump as there will be a large number of voters sending in ballots. Come November who knows what this country will look like as we have idiots all over the country ignoring any precautions and out and about as if nothing ever happened and with November being the beginning of the flu season and people ignoring the pandemic warnings this country can fall right back into the same hole we were in.
Brownlow's candidacy was based purely on Bush/Republican backlash. He was an anti-war evangelical who sued the state over a police response to his family's anti-war protest, and wanted to have Bush tried for war crimes. So both your and my wife's statements are true.I think Smith lost due more to Bush back-lash/Republican back-lash. I don't think he was a horrible senator, and in my memory of that era, he suffered a loss due to "guilt by association".
I think Smith lost due more to Bush back-lash/Republican back-lash. I don't think he was a horrible senator, and in my memory of that era, he suffered a loss due to "guilt by association".
A couple of points:
1. Vote by mail is controlled by the individual election laws of the 50 states, plus DC and US territories. It’s not likely there will be a uniform application throughout the country.
2. The recent special election for the congressional seat in the California 25th District was conducted almost entirely by mail. The Republican won by 12 points. Some folks believe that vote by mail favors Republicans because it requires planning to do it and getting it in the mail by a certain date, something that may be harder for poorer folks to do.
Yeah, I got into a rather heated discussion (imagine that) 2-3 days ago concerning that very issue. IMO, I believe voting, aside from being a right given to us, is also our civic duty. Aside from voting for POTUS in November, there are also other positions up for bid at the ballot box.I wish people took voting much more seriously than they do. I know people are busy, and what not, but it's still important to vote.
On the plus side, I think most of the people who don't vote are dullards who don't know shit, so maybe it's good they don't vote. They might vote for really stupid shit.
This must have been an offline, IRL discussion, because the exchange we had in the forum about that was very civil.Yeah, I got into a rather heated discussion (imagine that) 2-3 days ago concerning that very issue. IMO, I believe voting, aside from being a right given to us, is also our civic duty. Aside from voting for POTUS in November, there are also other positions up for bid at the ballot box.