Nate Dogg
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 3,118
- Likes
- 21
- Points
- 38
I concur. I was at the RG too. They did really flash that on the screen.Is it real? Did they really have that on the screen at the RG?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I concur. I was at the RG too. They did really flash that on the screen.Is it real? Did they really have that on the screen at the RG?
Really? I figured the Pippen lead squads would have won more games at home. Impressive.
My guess is that a sizeable portion of the posters on here were too young to ever catch a game at the Glass Palace. That's really too bad. We were only 12,888 (12,666 pre-expansion), but that place absolutely SHOOK with noise. When we moved to the RG, I really felt like we lost a huge chunk of our home court advantage. Now, we seem to have it back.
I only got to go once or twice, mostly because the tickets were so damn hard to come by.
My guess is that a sizeable portion of the posters on here were too young to ever catch a game at the Glass Palace. That's really too bad. We were only 12,888 (12,666 pre-expansion), but that place absolutely SHOOK with noise. When we moved to the RG, I really felt like we lost a huge chunk of our home court advantage. Now, we seem to have it back.
My guess is that a sizeable portion of the posters on here were too young to ever catch a game at the Glass Palace. That's really too bad. We were only 12,888 (12,666 pre-expansion), but that place absolutely SHOOK with noise. When we moved to the RG, I really felt like we lost a huge chunk of our home court advantage. Now, we seem to have it back.
Those teams took too many nights off at home. Of course, they were so talented that winning on the road wasn't that big of a deal for them. This team feeds off the energy at home.
My guess is that a sizeable portion of the posters on here were too young to ever catch a game at the Glass Palace. That's really too bad. We were only 12,888 (12,666 pre-expansion), but that place absolutely SHOOK with noise. When we moved to the RG, I really felt like we lost a huge chunk of our home court advantage. Now, we seem to have it back.
If we could have been a .500 road team this year, we'd be in 2nd place.
As much as we bitch about our road record, it's just as bad as other playoff teams.
Last season, Utah, Denver, and Dallas were all 17-24 on the road. And this season, Houston, Utah, and Dallas are all below .500 on the road.
16-20 with games remaining at OKC, MEM, and LAC is pretty decent when you put it into to perspective with our opponents' records.
I agree with that. Although we haven't beaten a top-9 West team on the road (other than the CP3-less Hornets), that's just a next step in the natural progression for us next season.
We've already established a great home court. If we were great on the road, we'd have 55 wins and the No. 2 seed sewn up. I don't think anyone should've expected that.
As much as we bitch about our road record, it's just as bad as other playoff teams.
Last season, Utah, Denver, and Dallas were all 17-24 on the road. And this season, Houston, Utah, and Dallas are all below .500 on the road.
16-20 with games remaining at OKC, MEM, and LAC is pretty decent when you put it into to perspective with our opponents' records.
