Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would the Lakers do this? They could easily dump Clarkson for nothing if it came down to it. Ingram and Kuzma are on cheap contracts and likely wouldn't be dealt unless someone better than CJ is coming back. CJ is also on a massive contract so it doesn't help them shed salary either. Plus they have to add 3 picks too?
Let's put it this way: Even if cap space wasn't the issue the Lakers wouldn't trade Kuzma and Ingram for CJ. This should probably be in the crazy trade thread.
They save salary and it would cost them probably 2 picks to dump Dengs 17 million a year deal, another asset/s to trim of Clarksons 10 plus million. CJ would add a fringe all star ability and veteran presence that Lebron craves. That is the Lakers dream we absolutely must make them pay to help facilitate making it possible.
Nah, this belongs in the crazy trade thread. They have their sights set much higher than CJ. There are plenty of teams that would take Clarkson the Lakers are just trying to get something for him before just giving him away in a few days. If they can't they will trade him somewhere for an expiring contract. Deng's deal is a real problem for them but they will likely just use the stretch provision this summer on the remaining money so it isn't quite as bad. There is zero chance they give up either Ingram or Kuzma to get rid of him, let alone both of them and picks.
They gave up Russel who is better than either Ingram or Kuzma just to shed Mozgovs deal. This trade doesnt saddle them with nine million in dead money like stretching Deng would and CJ could easily be moved if it looks like they could sign Lebron.
If the Lakers can move Clarkson and not give up a first in doing so then you can move this to fallacy. Until then at bare minimum we should be asking for Ingram Kuzma and picks from the Lakers.
An alternative to that CJ would be to deal him to Cleveland for JR Smith, Crowder, Nets pick and Cleveland 2019 pick.
This isn't exactly ideal return but if Crowder remembers how to defend and Lebron leaves this summer then we land 2 likely top 10 picks and a cheap rotation guy in Crowder.
^I don't know why CLE would do that, but that's the type of deal that could reset the team going forward.
BTW, CLE doesn't have their 2019. The soonest we could get one is "two years after the 2019 pick conveys", which would be 2021. Still that would be interesting. I still like CJ (when you get your hands on a 25ppg-potential scorer you don't give him up lightly, especially when he's a great fit for the city and franchise) and think we can do other things to upgrade. Sure, 1 year off the window may go away by waiting until this summer or next year to trade away some dead cap weight, but resetting like this means that 3-4 years are going to pass by before Dame/Nurk/Collins?/Lotto Pick1 are ready to compete highly.
I think if you tried that a Vulcan would send you on a one-way trip to the bottom of Lake Union on PA's bidding. Rich Cho barely escaped, and he had to go to CHA.If I was to trade CJ, I would not stop with him. Damian would also have to go. I would keep Nurkic since he is young enough and if he gets better then his value increases and if not his new deal would likely be running out by the time we would be ready to compete.
This just doesn't make sense to me....CJ I can see trading..Dame....notIf I was to trade CJ, I would not stop with him. Damian would also have to go.
This just doesn't make sense to me....CJ I can see trading..Dame....not
I see the point, but we're already the second-youngest team in the league behind PHI. And if we tore the entire thing down for lotto picks, the best we could hope for is a superstar and maybe another all-star caliber player or two. We kind of have the almost-superstar and the all-star caliber player. Players on their rookie contract (especially high lotto picks) generally never lead their teams to championships, so we're taking a 3-5 year pause to just get (hopefully) back to where we are right this second.Thanks, didn't have a chance to check owed picks. The point is we could easily acquire numerous assets for some of our pieces especially if we are willing to sit back for a few years and eat some bad contacts while we acquire pieces to rebuild around.
I see the point, but we're already the second-youngest team in the league behind PHI. And if we tore the entire thing down for lotto picks, the best we could hope for is a superstar and maybe another all-star caliber player or two. We kind of have the almost-superstar and the all-star caliber player. Players on their rookie contract (especially high lotto picks) generally never lead their teams to championships, so we're taking a 3-5 year pause to just get (hopefully) back to where we are right this second.
In my mind, that doesn't make sense. I mean, it seems as if Meyers/Mo were making the vet min and ET was making Ed Davis money (but we were still over the salary cap), people would be loving the fact that we're the highest above .500 that we've been in years and a couple of games out of the 3 seed. We're victims of skewed expectations and nitpicking. Yes, I want to see the roster get better. Yes, we're all kind of used to having GMs that wheel and deal. Yes, it's frustrating seeing other teams get better. But we're in "medicine-taking" mode with Meyers/Mo/ET and we should just enjoy seeing what this team can do. Maybe it's a first-round flameout. Maybe we steal a couple of games in the 2nd round. Maybe we make a miracle rip-off deal. But if you don't like watching this team play every night, I don't think you're going to like watching the 2003-2006 Blazers redux much more.
