Apple stock at $520

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Yes, it does. The fact that you don't even know what you don't know, proves my point.



HAHA! LOL!

If you think IDEs are compute intensive, you should stop by for a tour someday.

You were right about Apple stock price, too.

2 for 2!
 
Yes, it does. The fact that you don't even know what you don't know, proves my point.



HAHA! LOL!

If you think IDEs are compute intensive, you should stop by for a tour someday.

Stop by what?

barfo
 
What did I say about the Apple stock price?

You repeatedly and effectively pushed mags to buy Apple stock with the implication he'd lose money. Seems to me he's made money, or at least he's up on paper. Then you pushed him to sell when it hit $500.

Neat!
 
You repeatedly and effectively pushed mags to buy Apple stock with the implication he'd lose money. Seems to me he's made money, or at least he's up on paper. Then you pushed him to sell when it hit $500.

Neat!

Wow. I don't know why in the world you've decided to lie when it's easily accessible by searching.

You look like a complete fool.
 
Wow. I don't know why in the world you've decided to lie when it's easily accessible by searching.

You look like a complete fool.

I just read the entire earlier thread. Last post ~9/11.

You harped on every downturn of the stock price. As if Mags was a fool for buying the stock. He has every right to start this thread and rub our noses in the current price.

I normally don't feed trolls, but in your case, I'll make an exception.
 
You repeatedly and effectively pushed mags to buy Apple stock with the implication he'd lose money. Seems to me he's made money, or at least he's up on paper. Then you pushed him to sell when it hit $500.

Neat!

And yet, in the thread you linked, you posted this:

There's your imaginary price, and there's the real thing.


If you believe in your lack of knowledge about stocks, go all in.


Like I said, you're posts are making you look asinine.
 
And yet, in the thread you linked, you posted this:





Like I said, you're posts are making you look asinine.

Wait, so we both were saying the same thing. That would make your posts asinine.

Just wow.
 
I just read the entire earlier thread. Last post ~9/11.

You harped on every downturn of the stock price. As if Mags was a fool for buying the stock. He has every right to start this thread and rub our noses in the current price.

I normally don't feed trolls, but in your case, I'll make an exception.

You're being absolutely pathetic right now, troll.

Mags original claim was calling a price and a time. He was wrong with those.

I called him out on his ridiculous "valuation" models, and never once made a claim as to what the stock price would be.

Stop trolling for page views and stop being completely dishonest.
 
In your imagination.

I posted what the stock price was, period.

This is possibly the most pathetic post I've ever seen here.

I quoted you, and you blatantly try to deny that you typed it.

Sad, sad little man.
 
Last edited:
You're being absolutely pathetic right now, troll.

Mags original claim was calling a price and a time. He was wrong with those.

I called him out on his ridiculous "valuation" models, and never once made a claim as to what the stock price would be.

Stop trolling for page views and stop being completely dishonest.

Mags original claim was the stock had a price that was actually significantly higher than the stock price. That I couldn't figure out, since there are only two prices: bid and ask.

He was absolutely right about the direction it went, and made money on his buy.

How about you quote my post about the stock buyback and supply/demand effect on price.

I didn't think you would.
 
Mags original claim was the stock had a price that was actually significantly higher than the stock price. That I couldn't figure out, since there are only two prices: bid and ask.

He was absolutely right about the direction it went, and made money on his buy.

How about you quote my post about the stock buyback and supply/demand effect on price.

I didn't think you would.

This is sad, even for you Denny.

Denny Crane said:
You repeatedly and effectively pushed mags to buy Apple stock with the implication he'd lose money.

Actually, it was you as you clearly made the following post:
Denny Crane said:
There's your imaginary price, and there's the real thing.


If you believe in your lack of knowledge about stocks, go all in.

And then you want to build the strawman about something nobody is actually talking about...

Denny Crane said:
How about you quote my post about the stock buyback and supply/demand effect on price.

Pathetic.

And then we come across your post from that original thread, which is awesome in the context of your Apple loving earlier in this thread...

Denny Crane said:
Apple has stopped innovating. It blows.
 
Last edited:
Can't we all just celebrate how apple is the company we all wished we owned?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top