BFT: Trade talk

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Fez Hammersticks

スーパーバッド Zero Cool
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
29,207
Likes
9,899
Points
113
John talked to an NBA exec and this is what he found out:

*Blazers investigated trading Roy before he signed the extension.

*Roy likely to stay with the Blazers for obvious reasons: No value.

*LaMarcus Aldridge is the type of player execs love: Young, athletic, puts up numbers. A bit overpaid but still holds a lot of value around the League.

*Batum is another player who will command interest from teams.

*Rudy's value is a low first or an early second. If they wait too long they wont get anything for Rudy.

*Joel Przybilla at worst is a very good backup Center if he can get healthy. Has trade value.

*Rich Cho is making a lot of calls but has no real plan. Not proposing trades. "They're going to sit".
 
Last edited:
John talked to an NBA exec and this is what he found out:

*Blazers investigated trading Roy before he signed the extension.

*Roy likely to stay with the Blazers for obvious reasons: No value.

*LaMarcus Aldridge is the type of player execs love: Young, athletic, puts up numbers. A bit overpaid but still holds a lot of value around the League.

*Batum is another player who will command interest from teams.

*Rudy's value is a low first or an early second. If they wait too long they wont get anything for Rudy.

*Joel Przybilla at worse is a very good backup Center if he can get healthy. Has trade value.

That all sounds about right to me. Anything about Miller/Camby?
 
Stupid take on Rudy from Canzano. An early second already is no value. Statistically speaking neither is a late 1st (Based onhow many of them make it in the NBA) So I don't see the rush there. Other than he is ice cold.
 
Yeah, no real need to trade Rudy for a late first unless it's going to be used in another deal.
 
I want to get atleast some kind of return before his contract expires and he goes back to Europe.
 
I really hope Joel can shake off his rust so he will be valuable as a player and an expiring contract.
 
The "has no real plan" didn't need to be said

That is like asking Chip Kelly "what his plan is for the second half". The real answer being "why the fuck would I tell you"?

I guess my point is why would a NBA exec know if he had a plan?
 
The "has no real plan" didn't need to be said

Is there even a way to 'plan' your way out of the mess that this roster has become? It seems like the team (from ownership to the players) is in pure water bailing mode; just trying to stay afloat long enough until a sliver of land appears on the horizon.
 
"They're going to sit"

I seriously doubt that, I mean let's be honest if you are Cho and want to start building from your blueprint, now is the time to make the change. We all sit and ponder about the moves we would make, how we would build a team, who would be the coach. Does anyone really think that a guy like Cho who actually works as a GM doesn't do the same. He has a vision, but can he convince PA to let him work towards it. I think every loss helps Cho get more control over the future.
 
Intresting. So no one else thinks that most GM's have a plan for their team? Right or wrong, the team needs to decide to move forward or fall behing by staying put
 
Intresting. So no one else thinks that most GM's have a plan for their team? Right or wrong, the team needs to decide to move forward or fall behing by staying put

Dont you think that our plans have changed a few times this year and may depend on how the team plays the next month and a half?
 
I'll throw this out there. Joel probably wouldn't mind going home to Milwaukee to play. Milwaukee has some players I find intriguing. Larry Sanders for one. I also believe Corey Maghetti could be an awesome go go guy off the bench, who would also provide a post presence. This trade won't work currently in any trade machines because they won't take into account the fact that we have injury exceptions to deal, but I believe it will if you count those. Larry Sanders is an excellent defensive PF/C type who has a ton of potential. Maggette doesn't seem to fit in the Bucks system well, with his numbers down across the board, from what is otherwise a solid career. We need bench scoring. We need a future big to develope. This provides both and sends Joel to a place he calls home. We might have to throw in a player to make salaries work, but I think Greg Odens injury exception would come close to sealing the deal.
 
I guess I am coming from the possition that I already thought they needed to change the team.

I think any team that is not progressing needs to make changes as well. The injuries to Greg and Brandon though cloud the direction we should go.
 
Intresting. So no one else thinks that most GM's have a plan for their team? Right or wrong, the team needs to decide to move forward or fall behing by staying put

The "going to sit" mentality could be as much about the uncertainty of the next CBA as anything. But who really knows what the hive mind wants to do (besides get under the luxury tax and probably avoid any more cap crippling contracts until Roy and/or Aldridge are off the books).
 
I'll throw this out there. Joel probably wouldn't mind going home to Milwaukee to play. Milwaukee has some players I find intriguing. Larry Sanders for one. I also believe Corey Maghetti could be an awesome go go guy off the bench, who would also provide a post presence. This trade won't work currently in any trade machines because they won't take into account the fact that we have injury exceptions to deal, but I believe it will if you count those. Larry Sanders is an excellent defensive PF/C type who has a ton of potential. Maggette doesn't seem to fit in the Bucks system well, with his numbers down across the board, from what is otherwise a solid career. We need bench scoring. We need a future big to develope. This provides both and sends Joel to a place he calls home. We might have to throw in a player to make salaries work, but I think Greg Odens injury exception would come close to sealing the deal.

I like Sanders too. But, why do the Bucks do it? Sanders as a prospect is more valuable to them than Przybilla's expiring. Especially in a market like Milwaukie where prospects are definitely more important than cap space.

Thats the problem with a lot of these trade hypotheticals. They only make sense from a Blazer standpoint.
 
The Lakers just traded "The Machine", lets trade them Rudy for Blake!

Lakers get a 3pt shooter and we get our Blakey back!
 
Cho has a plan. It involves Tandoori Chicken, Lamb Saag and Allo Paratha
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top