Big Time Anti-Gay Leader Caught With Male Prostitute

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
DaRizzle

DaRizzle

BLAKER
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
9,631
Likes
104
Points
48
When George Alan Rekers, a cofounder along with James Dobson of the Family Research Council and a leader in the ex-gay movement, was caught walking off a plane from Europe with a young male prostitute, he first insisted that he didn't know the young man was an escort until halfway through their 10-day vacation.

"I had surgery," Rekers told the Miami New Times, which broke the story yesterday, "and I can't lift luggage. That's why I hired him."

Rekers had hired the escort, dubbed "Lucien" by the New Times, through the website RentBoy.com (NSFW), a popular site that hosts ads for gay male escorts. There's little mistaking what the site is for.

The site's users first encounter a disclaimer that the may encounter "content and materials that are of a graphic and/or sexual nature," and must agree to terms and conditions before entering. The homepage is predominantly photos of naked men. To search for an escort, or "find boys," one can even select a specialty: "rentboy," "sugardaddy" or "masseur."

"I do not believe that there is any way a person could be mistaken about what they are hiring when they find a listing on our website," a spokesman for RentBoy tells TPM in an email. "I think it is clear from our ad campaigns in gay publications and our website itself that we are targeting a gay audience -- gay men seeking men for hire."

Rekers has long advocated for protecting children from "harmful" homosexual influences. He sits on a committee of the American College of Pediatricians, which believes "children exposed to the homosexual lifestyle may be at increased risk for emotional, mental, and even physical harm." He's a board member of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality.


He has also been paid tens of thousands of dollars by the states of Florida and Arkansas for testimony defending their bans against gay couples adopting children. The judges in both cases found that Rekers' testimony less than credible.

So it was surprising when Rekers admitted to traveling with a gay prostitute. When first confronted with a photo of the two together after returning from a trip in April, Rekers said he simply didn't know what "Lucien" had really been advertising until halfway through their trip. Both men told the New Times that they didn't have sex.

But he later told another blogger that he was simply trying to save his friend by "lovingly" sharing the message of Jesus, as he had done with other "sexual sinners."
Click to expand...

Here is the picture of the prostitute "helping" with his luggage....dont carry too much :tsktsk:
rentboy.jpg


PROSTITUTE SAYS THEY HAD SEX
The male escort hired by anti-gay activist George Alan Rekers has told Miami New Times the Baptist minister is a homosexual who paid him to provide body rubs once a day in the nude, during their ten-day vacation in Europe.

Rekers allegedly named his favorite maneuver the "long stroke" -- a complicated caress "across his penis, thigh... and his anus over the butt cheeks," as the escort puts it. "Rekers liked to be rubbed down there," he says.

In his first interview since New Times broke the story Tuesday, the 20-year-old escort, who prefers to go by the name Lucien, contradicts Rekers's contentions that he hired the escort to help carry his luggage and that he was trying to save the soul of a lost sinner.

Although Rekers does have physical ailments that make it difficult for him to haul suitcases, Lucien wasn't hired to carry luggage on their European vacation, the escort says.
Click to expand...

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2010/05/george_rekers_is_a_homosexual_says_escort.php


:biglaugh::clap::biglaugh::clap:
 
I think it's starting to boil down to this: whatever a person is overly moral about, they're probably doing it. I'm overly moral about having sex with female models.
 
First, I'm a hypocrite because I find the thought of two men together repulsive, but the thought of two women together highly erotic.

Second, I have a very dim view of people who parade against or for something and then do the opposite. Like the enviromentalists who are now suddendly against wind power, bio mass, recycling, hybrid vehicles, managed forestry... because they won, and now as the victors and without fights to fight they have lost their money and power base. So, to keep the money coming in they have to be against all they once stood for. And this bozo is no different. Actually, he makes me sick.
 
Rush Limbaugh and the folks over at Fox News are going to have a field day with this...

Oh wait
 
What makes it even worse is that he lied about it all. He was caught red handed (there's a pun in there somewhere, I just know it) and then lied. That makes it even worse. A lot worse.
 
I've had sex with someone who most of you know who is soooooo closeted.
 
I wish I could tell but the guy's a decent guy and I promised I wouldn't.
 
Out of sheer morbid curiosity: for those of you of the homosexual persuasion, how does news like this make you feel? For all the "PC-ness" going around, it still seems like this subject is treated as a partial taboo by many...does this make you feel vindicated? Sad for someone who also is homosexual but can't talk about it? Wanting to help a confused person? Happy that the issue gets more out there and people become aware? Angry that some of the best-known homosexuals are hypocrites, or that they're portrayed somehow as criminal?

I mean, of all the "scandals" about public figures, it seems that "caught doing gay things when you're not open about it" ranks right up there as one of the worst things you can do for your career. Edwards cheated on his wife and lied about the resulting baby's paternity for 2 years...Cheney shot someone in the head and still stayed VP...some guy taps another guy's foot in a bathroom in an airport and he's vilified. Blago was indicted for corruption, fraud and bribery--and stayed as governor for the rest of his term and is on Celebrity Apprentice. What is it about sexuality that makes people vilify these people so much?
 
BrianFromWA said:
Out of sheer morbid curiosity: for those of you of the homosexual persuasion, how does news like this make you feel? For all the "PC-ness" going around, it still seems like this subject is treated as a partial taboo by many...does this make you feel vindicated? Sad for someone who also is homosexual but can't talk about it? Wanting to help a confused person? Happy that the issue gets more out there and people become aware? Angry that some of the best-known homosexuals are hypocrites, or that they're portrayed somehow as criminal?

I mean, of all the "scandals" about public figures, it seems that "caught doing gay things when you're not open about it" ranks right up there as one of the worst things you can do for your career. Edwards cheated on his wife and lied about the resulting baby's paternity for 2 years...Cheney shot someone in the head and still stayed VP...some guy taps another guy's foot in a bathroom in an airport and he's vilified. Blago was indicted for corruption, fraud and bribery--and stayed as governor for the rest of his term and is on Celebrity Apprentice. What is it about sexuality that makes people vilify these people so much?
Click to expand...

Although I am fully of the heterosuxual persuasion, I think the answer is that the majority of people consider Homosexuality, especially in men, as morally wrong- Or at least a waste of male sexuality as there are so many women and so little time. Therefore, it naturally follows their personal biases play out against such people and they are villified even to a greater extent. As an example, is Sam Adams the first politician to lie in a political race and pull the Politically Correct Card against others? Of course not. But, when his particular lie comes back as a 40 year old male pursuing a 17 year old male, then his lies become so much more magnified than most other politicians.

Is that right? Probably not, but it's the way it is.
 
BrianFromWA said:
I mean, of all the "scandals" about public figures, it seems that "caught doing gay things when you're not open about it" ranks right up there as one of the worst things you can do for your career. Edwards cheated on his wife and lied about the resulting baby's paternity for 2 years...Cheney shot someone in the head and still stayed VP...some guy taps another guy's foot in a bathroom in an airport and he's vilified. Blago was indicted for corruption, fraud and bribery--and stayed as governor for the rest of his term and is on Celebrity Apprentice. What is it about sexuality that makes people vilify these people so much?
Click to expand...

As the old saying goes: The worst thing that can happen to a male politician is to be caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.

Leaving aside the necrophilia/pedophilia part of that joke, it comes down to differences. 50-60 years ago, the joke probably would have involved interracial sex. Sex is a hot button issue in this nation, moreso than in Europe (probably largely due to the Puritan influence that founded the nation) and when you combine it with the natural (though, happily, slowly changing) instinct to distrust/vilify difference, it creates a bad PR cocktail (pun intended).
 
Minstrel said:
As the old saying goes: The worst thing that can happen to a male politician is to be caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.

Leaving aside the necrophilia/pedophilia part of that joke, it comes down to differences. 50-60 years ago, the joke probably would have involved interracial sex. Sex is a hot button issue in this nation, moreso than in Europe (probably largely due to the Puritan influence that founded the nation) and when you combine it with the natural (though, happily, slowly changing) instinct to distrust/vilify difference, it creates a bad PR cocktail (pun intended).
Click to expand...


If we are to respect differences in others, do we respect those who feel homosexuality is morally wrong? Or are those people excluded because they don't agree with those who feel otherwise?
 
BLAZER PROPHET said:
If we are to respect differences in others, do we respect those who feel homosexuality is morally wrong? Or are those people excluded because they don't agree with those who feel otherwise?
Click to expand...

I think respecting innate differences (differences intrinsic to who we are, which I consider to be things like race, gender, sexuality) is important. Beliefs and ideas are not the same thing, as far as I'm concerned. If I believe, for example, that all Christians should be exterminated....I don't think anyone should respect that belief. Tolerance does not imply having to "tolerate intolerance" to be consistent.
 
BLAZER PROPHET said:
If we are to respect differences in others, do we respect those who feel homosexuality is morally wrong? Or are those people excluded because they don't agree with those who feel otherwise?
Click to expand...

Do you respect Nazis? Do you respect KKK members? Start there.
 
Respecting someone's beliefs about people is different than respecting people for who they are. I don't respect Nazis and KKK members.

People with who hate gays weren't born that way. They chose that line of thinking. Gays didn't choose to be gay.
 
Last edited:
If I respect Jews and black people, that doesn't mean I have to respect Nazis and KKK members because I should also respect people with different beliefs.

It's different.
 
BLAZER PROPHET said:
If we are to respect differences in others, do we respect those who feel homosexuality is morally wrong? Or are those people excluded because they don't agree with those who feel otherwise?
Click to expand...

It's fine to respect both homosexuals and those who oppose it. The problem comes when rights are being denied.
 
Rekers allegedly named his favorite maneuver the "long stroke" LMAO
 
And way better than the "are you in yet?"
 
Minstrel said:
I think respecting innate differences (differences intrinsic to who we are, which I consider to be things like race, gender, sexuality) is important. Beliefs and ideas are not the same thing, as far as I'm concerned. If I believe, for example, that all Christians should be exterminated....I don't think anyone should respect that belief. Tolerance does not imply having to "tolerate intolerance" to be consistent.
Click to expand...

Double negative.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top