Bill Gates, Toshiba in early talks on nuclear reactor

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Denny Crane

It's not even loaded!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
73,113
Likes
10,942
Points
113
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100323/ts_afp/japannuclearusgatescompanytoshiba_20100323053821

Bill Gates, Toshiba in early talks on nuclear reactor

Tue Mar 23, 1:37 am ET

TOKYO (AFP) – A company backed by Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Toshiba are in early talks to jointly develop a small nuclear reactor, the Japanese electronics giant said Tuesday.

The Nikkei business daily earlier reported that the two sides would team up to develop a compact next-generation reactor that can operate for up to 100 years without refueling to provide emission-free energy.

The daily said the joint development would focus on the Traveling-Wave Reactor (TWR), which consumes depleted uranium as fuel. Current light-water reactors require refueling every few years.

"Toshiba has entered into preliminary talks with TerraPower," said Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori. "We are looking into the possibility of working together."

Gates is the principal owner of TerraPower, an expert team based in the US state of Washington that is investigating ways to improve emission-free energy supplies using small nuclear reactors.

Unlike the current reactors at mega power plants, the smaller types could be introduced by cities or states or in developing countries more easily.

Ohmori said Gates, together with other TerraPower executives, had visited a Toshiba laboratory for nuclear power research near Tokyo last year.

"TerraPower is developing a small nuclear reactor and Toshiba is developing a different kind of small reactor. They were interested in Toshiba's technology and aiming at practical realisation" of small reactors, he said.

Ohmori said the two sides had just begun to "exchange information" but stressed that "nothing concrete has been decided on development or investment."

Gates is expected to use his personal wealth to back the development of TWRs and his investment could reach several billion dollars, the Nikkei said.

The news boosted Toshiba's share price by around four percent Tuesday.

The Nikkei said TerraPower had decided to join hands with Toshiba as it lacks the know-how to manufacture nuclear power equipment.

Toshiba, which owns US nuclear plant maker Westinghouse, has developed a design for an ultracompact reactor that can operate continuously for 30 years.

The company is preparing to apply for US approval to start constructing the first such reactor as early as 2014 and put it into practical use by the end of the decade, Ohmori said.
 
In basketball terms: slam dunk. If they can make it work, and it sounds close to reality.
 
I wonder how small these ultra compact reactors can get. I want a nuclear car that never needs gas!!
 
I THINK WE SHOULD JUST FOCUS ON WINDMILLS. THEY ARE THE FUTURE (of my balls).
 
1063747-1261078579132_super.jpg
 
HAHA. Agreed. Windmills are such a joke to appease the dumbasses that don't want to actually think about the problem.

I would agree that windmills are a joke if you want to power anywhere that isn't the great plains. But I think they are a solid option in the great plains, because they have enough wind there. You don't lose too much electricity in the wires if you're not going across the country.

Here is big Willy talking about this general subject:

[video=youtube;JaF-fq2Zn7I]"]
 
Turbines are not a large scale solution but they are far from being a joke.
 
Yes, wind turbines are a joke if the goal is to rid ourselves of fossil fuel-based power. Same with most current solar (especially PV type) attempts.
 
Turbines are not a large scale solution but they are far from being a joke.

This sentence is self-contradictory. I'm pretty sure the goal is eliminating our fossil fuel dependence, which requires a large (extremely large) scale solution. Thus, wind power is a joke.
 
This sentence is self-contradictory. I'm pretty sure the goal is eliminating our fossil fuel dependence, which requires a large (extremely large) scale solution. Thus, wind power is a joke.
Ok well if you are expecting a single solution turbines aren't it. Turbines can help to solve the energy crisis if combined with conservation measures and the use of other environmentally benign energy sources. A 140MW turbine farm located nearby is powering my office.
 
This sentence is self-contradictory. I'm pretty sure the goal is eliminating our fossil fuel dependence, which requires a large (extremely large) scale solution. Thus, wind power is a joke.

Only for closed minded individuals. The facts are that no one solutions solves all the problem, so a variety of solutions is needed to address one problem. No one solution is the solution of all energy ills. But a variety of solutions put together, will solve the problem. Wind is one of those solutions. Nuclear is one of those solutions. Tidal power is one of those solutions.
 
Ok well if you are expecting a single solution turbines aren't it. Turbines can help to solve the energy crisis if combined with conservation measures and the use of other environmentally benign energy sources. A 140MW turbine farm located nearby is powering my office.

I don't think you understand! Brandon Roy should be able to win the game all by himself! He doesn't need a team!:devilwink:
 
This sentence is self-contradictory. I'm pretty sure the goal is eliminating our fossil fuel dependence, which requires a large (extremely large) scale solution. Thus, wind power is a joke.

Do you have electric home heating, electric hot water heating, and an electric car?
 
well, I'm paying (or will be paying) a "carbon offset" tax for LA DWP. Fucking piece of shit tax.

Taxing consumers 8-25% to for renewable energy which costs 3x as much. :ohno:
 
Only for closed minded individuals.

If you're replying to me, I think you meant "those that actually work in this field and have analyzed the issue"

The facts are that no one solutions solves all the problem, so a variety of solutions is needed to address one problem. No one solution is the solution of all energy ills. But a variety of solutions put together, will solve the problem. Wind is one of those solutions. Nuclear is one of those solutions. Tidal power is one of those solutions.

Right. And recycling helps too. :crazy:

The fact is, it is one of those things (like recycling) that makes people think they are making a difference, when in the grand scheme, it is insignificant. Meanwhile, the time, effort and funding would have been much better spent elsewhere.
 
Do you have electric home heating, electric hot water heating, and an electric car?

What does that have to do with whether or not the goal is to reduce (or eliminate) our dependence on fossil fuels?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top