Bill Simmons and Steve Kerr Talk Trail Blazers On The BS Report

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
127,009
Likes
147,622
Points
115
On this week’s BS Report, one of the weekly podcast on Grantland.com, host Bill Simmons and TNT analyst and Trail Blazer player Steve Kerr discuss the Portland Trail Blazers twice throughout the course of the hour long show. You can listen to the podcast in it’s entirety here, but for your convenience, I’ve transcribed the two segments pertaining to Portland.
First, Simmons brings up the Trail Blazers as the anti-Cavaliers, a team struggling at 4-7 with roster issues.
Kerr: … (Cavaliers guard Dion) Waiters is the guy who doesn’t really fit into the whole equation. You kind of mentioned it, he needs the ball. To me the biggest problem is he wants to dribble the ball all the time. You really only want one guy on your team who is going to break down the defense off the dribble. Once you get more than one, you get two or three guys like that and they all want to do it all the time, then you get no offensive rhythm and no ball movement. I think that]s a problem. The Waiters/Kyrie (Irving) combination just does not look very good.
Simmons: Then you look at it on the flip side, you know, Portland, which was a team I actually thought was going to make the playoffs. You watch that team offensively and the pieces make sense, right? Like, (Damian) Lillard has the ball most of the time, they have shooters in place, they have a low post game, (Robin) Lopez doesn’t want the ball. And just the way that roster, the way their five guys mesh, makes sense. I watched that Cleveland team and it didn’t make sense.
But the section with the most meat comes when the conversation turns to the Rockets and Omer Asik, who is reportedly disgruntled with his role as Dwight Howard’s backup and who the Rockets are currently attempting to trade. Simmons throws out the idea of Houston moving Asik to the Thunder for Kendrick Perkins, to the Pelicans for Ryan Anderson, to the Celtics for Jeff Green or to the Trail Blazers for Lopez and parts …
Simmons: I think Portland’s a possibility too because you think, like, (Houston) gets (Robin) Lopez back, they get one more shooter, they get Portland’s draft pick. And just Portland upgrading from, if they could figure out a way to upgrade from Lopez to Asik, now all the sudden they’d have a chance for like a four or a five seed, I feel like.
Kerr: Yeah, Portland would be interesting. They’re obviously a great story at 9-2. I thought they’d be pretty good. I thought they’d be the seventh or eighth seed in the playoffs just because they’re very good offensively and I felt like they’d be better on “D”. Terry Stotts has made some adjustments with their pick and roll coverage. Lopez, even though he’s not a flashy guy who you say “Wow, look at that guy!” he does some good things for them. He protects the rim, so their defense has gotten much better, which has allowed them to finish out games on the road like we’ve seen the last couple nights in Toronto and Brooklyn.
Simmons: You drafted Lopez.
Kerr: I did (Kerr was the Suns general manager from 2007 to 2010). I did, so you have to take that for what it’s worth. Maybe I’ve got a little bias going but I just think, if you want to really compete in the NBA at a high level, you have to have rim protection of some sort. Chicago, two years ago, the reason they were so great and they were in the conference finals with Miami was there bench play with (Taj) Gibson and (Omer) Asik coming in together was so devastating defensively and then they always had (Joakim) Noah in the there to protect the rim as well. Unless you have Lebron — then you can do things in an unorthodox manner — you better have somebody who can protect the rim.
Simmons: I like Lopez. That trade, everything that New Orleans did, and I wrote about it, Jalen and I talked about it in our big preview series, I just hated what New Orleans did. To give away Lopez, who I think was only five million bucks this year, to just give him away because you wanted to overpay Tyreke Evans is just nonsensical to me. I’d rather have Lopez! Just in a vacuum I’d rather have Lopez. But then if I were to pay him half as much as Tyreke Evans, I would double rather have Lopez!
Note: If the Trail Blazers pick in the 2014 Draft is 13 or later, it goes to the Bobcats, which was stipulated in the trade that netted the Trail Blazers Gerald Wallace.
Let’s also remember that this is just Simmons and Kerr shooting the breeze, not a rumor of any substance. Having said that, I know a lot of folks love Asik, but is he so much better than Lopez that you pay almost double for him AND potentially give up picks and, as Simmons suggests, a shooter? I suppose I could be persuaded, but I just don’t know. I like what we’ve got going right now.

- Casey Holdahl


http://forwardcenter.net/bill-simmons-and-steve-kerr-talk-trail-blazers-on-the-bs-report/
 
Last edited:
Nope, our chemistry is seriously gelling right now. There is no way I would fuck that up unless it was to obtain a serious superstar
 
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Let this chemistry flow. If problems arise, then address them.
 
...I know a lot of folks love Asik, but is he so much better than Lopez that you pay almost double for him AND potentially give up picks and, as Simmons suggests, a shooter? I suppose I could be persuaded, but I just don’t know. I like what we’ve got going right now.

If Houston is the one pressured into trading him because Asik isn't happy, I'm not sure the Blazers would have to be the ones to bend over backwards here. Conceivably, they could trade Lopez and maybe 1 spare part like Barton (sorry, Barton fans). They're getting a relatively similar center that makes 3 million less and doesn't mind coming off the bench and won't complain. That in of itself is a win. Plus, because Lopez is working on the Blazers (at least, he is right now), Portland is operating from a position of relative strength--unlike this summer when they were ravenous for size.
 
and still said no.

Well, I like Lopez a lot but for the right parts I just might be willing to pull the trigger. Asik is a beast on defense and better at rebounding. Remember the time the blazers where worried about ruining team chemistry? I believe it was when the Blazers could have traded Buck and Kersey for Barkley and spare parts. Looking back I can only wonder what could have been if the Blazers had taken that deal.
 
Last edited:
Well, I like Lopez a lot but for the right parts I just might be willing to pull the trigger. Asik is a beast on defense and better at rebounding.

on paper you have to consider it. In reality, hell no, Lopez fits this team far too well. I would never mess with the chemistry at this point.
 
Lopez can't be traded until the middle of December so we have plenty of time to go on a 3 game losing streak and change everyones mind!
 
If Houston is the one pressured into trading him because Asik isn't happy, I'm not sure the Blazers would have to be the ones to bend over backwards here. Conceivably, they could trade Lopez and maybe 1 spare part like Barton (sorry, Barton fans). They're getting a relatively similar center that makes 3 million less and doesn't mind coming off the bench and won't complain. That in of itself is a win. Plus, because Lopez is working on the Blazers (at least, he is right now), Portland is operating from a position of relative strength--unlike this summer when they were ravenous for size.

I think this makes sense for both teams.
 
Lopez can't be traded until the middle of December so we have plenty of time to go on a 3 game losing streak and change everyones mind!

I can see it now, "he's a stiff, get him out of here!"
 
If Houston is the one pressured into trading him because Asik isn't happy, I'm not sure the Blazers would have to be the ones to bend over backwards here. Conceivably, they could trade Lopez and maybe 1 spare part like Barton (sorry, Barton fans). They're getting a relatively similar center that makes 3 million less and doesn't mind coming off the bench and won't complain. That in of itself is a win. Plus, because Lopez is working on the Blazers (at least, he is right now), Portland is operating from a position of relative strength--unlike this summer when they were ravenous for size.

I'd want a draft pick back as well.
 
One thing that might scare off a lot of teams away from Asik is he Is still owed almost all his salary this year and he is owed 15m next year even though Its only a caphit of 8.5m .

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
 
One thing that might scare off a lot of teams away from Asik is he Is still owed almost all his salary this year and he is owed 15m next year even though Its only a caphit of 8.5m .

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Teams like NY, Brooklyn or maybe Dallas would be ok with that but yeah many owners will be hesitant to pay a guy $15 million who is terrible on offense. Defensive role players don't make near max money.
 
Teams like NY, Brooklyn or maybe Dallas would be ok with that but yeah many owners will be hesitant to pay a guy $15 million who is terrible on offense. Defensive role players don't make near max money.

It's funny you mention teams like teams like NY, Brooklyn or maybe Dallas would be ok with that but yeah many owners will be hesitant to pay a guy $15 million when the Blazers have one of the richest owners in the NBA.
 
Leonard, Barton and claver for asik or hang up

I think Leonard is an option because he might fit with Howard since he can play outside. But I think the prize for Houston may need to be CJ. He and Harden would fit well together too.

So Leonard, Cj and Claver......would you do it? That still leaves a lot of talent on our team. Seems fair value to me.
 
I think Leonard is an option because he might fit with Howard since he can play outside. But I think the prize for Houston may need to be CJ. He and Harden would fit well together too.

So Leonard, Cj and Claver......would you do it? That still leaves a lot of talent on our team. Seems fair value to me.

I actually would do it
 
It's funny you mention teams like teams like NY, Brooklyn or maybe Dallas would be ok with that but yeah many owners will be hesitant to pay a guy $15 million when the Blazers have one of the richest owners in the NBA.

They all have owners willing to dish out big money now. Paul Allen has repetitively said he wants the Blazers in the Black and When you have the insane money on NY/Brook on a small market team you are most definitely not in the Black.
 
I think Leonard is an option because he might fit with Howard since he can play outside. But I think the prize for Houston may need to be CJ. He and Harden would fit well together too.

So Leonard, Cj and Claver......would you do it? That still leaves a lot of talent on our team. Seems fair value to me.

We're not even sure what type of player we have in McCollum yet. Pass.
 
So Leonard, Cj and Claver......would you do it? That still leaves a lot of talent on our team. Seems fair value to me.

Is Asik going to make us a title contender this season or next? I think the answer needs to be yes or at the least a maybe before we should make this trade. We do have some more time to first evaluate this roster before the trading season. Asik will be an UFA while CJ will have two years left on his rookie contract so if our window is past that point I'm not sure I'd make the trade.
 
Is Asik going to make us a title contender this season or next? I think the answer needs to be yes or at the least a maybe before we should make this trade. We do have some more time to first evaluate this roster before the trading season. Asik will be an UFA while CJ will have two years left on his rookie contract so if our window is past that point I'm not sure I'd make the trade.

Well is Lopez going to make us a title contender? He may be a fan favorite but that does not mean he should be off limits.
 
I'd just like to reiterate, (or for the first time on this board) I love me some Steve Kerr. One of the few national media guys that had gushing and unsolicited praise for Aldridge last season and despite the Barkely/Smith on Blake bandwagon. He also had great things to say about Portland's off-season moves this summer. I honestly believe that media types have to have played/worked for (or with) the Blazers to appreciate them. The lack of it seems to lead me to the only conclusion that those people simply aren't watching Portland with any regularity.

Aside: Do y'all remember when Kerr had the Blazers doing yoga in practice when he played for Portland? I'd would have paid to see that, assuming they were all rockin' lululemon pants. ;)
 
Last edited:
I think Leonard is an option because he might fit with Howard since he can play outside. But I think the prize for Houston may need to be CJ. He and Harden would fit well together too.

So Leonard, Cj and Claver......would you do it? That still leaves a lot of talent on our team. Seems fair value to me.

That's not fair value. At all.

Two of those people haven't played at all this year, Leonard has played against Howard.

Houston would never do it.
 
Yeah, in a vacuum if a team would take our 10th, 11th and 12th man in order to give us someone like Asik, you should look at the deal.

I'm not certain Asik would like splitting minutes with Lopez.

I also think CJ is going to be a force in a few months.

I also think Eff DwightMare and the horse he rode into HOU on.
 
Lopez can't be traded until the middle of December so we have plenty of time to go on a 3 game losing streak and change everyones mind!

For some it just took the Phoenix game.
 
I would hate to give away CJ before seeing what he can do (and I really think he can contribute), but Wessy's resurgence and strong play definitely makes letting go of CJ easier.

CJ/Leonard to Mil
Ilyasova to HOU
Asik to POR

Get it done. Contend now. Usually, I'm vehemently against trading youth for vets who have reached their ceiling to try to contend in the present, but Asik's contract is very reasonable, and think he would perfectly complement the rest of our team.

We can somewhat deal with any potential injury to Wes because we have some guard depth, but if we lose Rolo, we're screwed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top