Blazer Ticket Prices To Vary According To Attractiveness Of Game

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
From: The O

In a move that leans heavily on the economic principle of supply and demand, the Trail Blazers this season will join a growing trend in professional sports by adopting "variable pricing" for single-game ticket sales.
The plan weighs heavily the quality of opponent, the day of the week, approaching milestones, injuries and winning or losing streaks.
For example, a fan could sit in the same seat in back-to-back home games this season in February, but pay more for a Saturday night contest against the NBA champion Los Angeles Lakers than for a Tuesday contest against the unproven Oklahoma City Thunder.

"This just makes sense," said Sarah Mensah, the Blazers chief marketing officer. "If the goal is to have a full building, you price in the most efficient way, on a game-by-game basis.".................
 
I'll take 2 tix to the $5 blowout game please.
 
I like the move. It sucks when the only tickets available are for a bunch of crap games. Then if you buy one you feel a little cheated since it was the same price as seeing a tier 1 team if you would have been able to buy sooner.

I'd like to see them also vary ticket prices throughout a section. So the back row of a section is less money and the front row is more money.
 
I like the move. It sucks when the only tickets available are for a bunch of crap games. Then if you buy one you feel a little cheated since it was the same price as seeing a tier 1 team if you would have been able to buy sooner.

I'd like to see them also vary ticket prices throughout a section. So the back row of a section is less money and the front row is more money.

Except you'll be paying last year's price for the bad game, and up to double for the good game. :devilwink:
 
"This just makes sense," said Sarah Mensah, the Blazers chief marketing officer. "If the goal is to have a full building, you price in the most efficient way, on a game-by-game basis.".................

But ... I thought every game was a sell-out, regardless of price/opponent? Seems as if the team could use an expanded viewing audience to drive up ad rates.
 
What took so long? I've always wondered why it hadn't been this way.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top