Breaking!!! PAC 16 - OMG!!!! According to Chip Brown

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

OSUBlazerfan

Writing Team
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
6,917
Likes
1,671
Points
113
UPDATED: Breaking!!! PAC 16 - OMG!!!! Colorado Officially In

Six schools being invited by Pac-10 - TX, A&M, Tech, OU, Ok State and Colo - expected to accept invitations, begin play in Pac-16 in 2012.

This is HUGGEEEE!!!!!

Sources say Colorado's mtg Tuesday night was about Pac-10 and Buffaloes will "opt out" of the Big 12.

http://twitter.com/ChipBrownOB
 
Last edited:
I cannot Believe It

Division1
Washington
Washington State
Oregon
Oregon State
California
Stanford
UCLA
USC

Division2

Arizona
Arizona State
Texas
Texas Tech
Texas A & M
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Colorado


soooo sick :)
 
That may be the biggest sports news of the decade. WOW. Now the Pac-16 needs it's own TV network and... FUCK YOU SEC!!!!
 
I'm sorry, but I call bullshit.


How is it that the Texas legislation is letting UT and a&m go without Baylor?
 
That may be the biggest sports news of the decade. WOW. Now the Pac-16 needs it's own TV network and... FUCK YOU SEC!!!!


Texas has it's own tv network, or is in the works to get one. I wonder what this will do to that? I also wonder what the name will be. Certainly not PAC anything. Still, I'd like to know how Baylor is getting left out and that is ok?
 
You mean CSNNW doesn't count?
 
You mean CSNNW doesn't count?


Classic.


My guess is Fox falls all over itself to secure this. Games in 3 time zones is awesome. the southern, or eastern league can start play at 10 am pst, then west coarst can finish up with a 7 pm start, Literally, 3 games all in a row on Fox would be huge for their advertising
 
The prob is two OSU's with black and Orange :))))

lol - good point. How does that work in the Big 12? As in, how do they determine who plays who from each division? Is it just a rotating thing? I just hope Oregon plays Washington every year.
 
That is pretty crazy, if it happens.

I'm glad they kept the original 8 in the same division/conference.
 
Texas has it's own tv network, or is in the works to get one. I wonder what this will do to that? I also wonder what the name will be. Certainly not PAC anything. Still, I'd like to know how Baylor is getting left out and that is ok?

They're naming it after me

West16
 
I don't think the 4-7 game gets much traction, but I could definitely see the "South" game being a 11am game, the "Pacific" games starting at 2, and a 7pm "Game of the Week"
 
I'm sorry, but I call bullshit.


How is it that the Texas legislation is letting UT and a&m go without Baylor?

If it's true, then it's because it's about money, and the market that Colorado would bring (Denver), would have a much greater impact than the market that Baylor would bring given the other three Texas schools already supposedly joining.
 
Im pretty sure everyone will play everyone within their own division, and then maybe 2 from the other division (or 3 if they go to 10 game conference schedule)
 
lol - good point. How does that work in the Big 12? As in, how do they determine who plays who from each division? Is it just a rotating thing? I just hope Oregon plays Washington every year.



In the Big 12, it works like this.


2 divisions.

Play everyone in your division once each year, and rotating a couple of games outside the division each year.

Then play a couple of non coference games against little sisters of the poor
 
A PAC 16 Championship game is going to kick extreme amounts of ass. It's going to be a tougher road for the Oregon's and UCLA's of the current PAC 10, but the strength of schedule the PAC 16 brings will make it, in a way, easier for a current PAC 10 team to win the national championship (minus USC, who already has a great chance based on strength of schedule and just being USC)
 
A PAC 16 Championship game is going to kick extreme amounts of ass. It's going to be a tougher road for the Oregon's and UCLA's of the current PAC 10, but the strength of schedule the PAC 16 brings will make it, in a way, easier for a current PAC 10 team to win the national championship (minus USC, who already has a great chance based on strength of schedule and just being USC)



I think if nothing else, it will get another school into the BCS ore often. That's more cash to split amongst the teams
 
Bad ass...now how about actually getting a playoff..they made this happen quickly. NCAA has had years to get a damn playoff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
julius said:
Simple solution. Go with the older school.
Hm is it osu?





Ha ha ha..oregon st lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Bad ass...now how about actually getting a playoff..they made this happen quickly. NCAA has had years to get a damn playoff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Actually, the implimentation of "super conferences" will make it harder for a playoff. Schools making an extra 20-30 million per year have no motivation to do it. The Boise States of the world are the ones that will cry for it now
 
okay, how about for confrences names:

THE16 (as in THE only conference that matters) hat tip to HCP
or
16WEST
or
BEST16
 
Back
Top