Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,198
- Likes
- 57,420
- Points
- 113
Re: 'Circumstances' of Colt Lyerla absence results in a loss for Mark Helfrich
It's not so much that I think Mundt should take his place, just that I've been wondering why Colt hasn't had more of an impact in the first two games. I thought it was because the Ducks weren't throwing to him, but in comes Mundt and he puts up big numbers, so what's the deal?
Why do you think Colt has so few receptions when he plays? It's almost like the Ducks use him as a fullback and not a TE.
before we all jump on the "Mundt is God, Colt should sit" bandwagon... sure Mundt had an excellent game receiving (Colt probably would have too, sometimes the game just dictates who you check down to, and the D decided to try and take away everyone else but Mundt) But there were some run plays where Colt was severely missed. The edges werent sealed off and w/o DAT's speed its a 3/4 yard loss.
This isnt to take away from Mundt, congrats on his debut. But he is in no way ready to supplant a player of Colt's caliber in the starting lineup, or on a regular basis.
It's not so much that I think Mundt should take his place, just that I've been wondering why Colt hasn't had more of an impact in the first two games. I thought it was because the Ducks weren't throwing to him, but in comes Mundt and he puts up big numbers, so what's the deal?
Why do you think Colt has so few receptions when he plays? It's almost like the Ducks use him as a fullback and not a TE.