Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Assists must have gone up, but rebounds I'd expect down.How does the assists and rebound numbers and shooting% look like ?
Also it would be interesting to compare the numbers ouf our full PF/C rotation from last year and this year.
I was interested so I pulled some numbers. Had difficulty determining who to use as back-up C and PF...Also it would be interesting to compare the numbers ouf our full PF/C rotation from last year and this year.
Also, I suspect the numbers would skew better if I were to use Aminu or Harkless
[B said:Then, they figured it out, and they've been firing on all cylinders ever since[/B]. CJ's lower FGA and AST totals suggest that he's re-accepted a more off-the-ball role, and that may have helped fuel their improved cohesion.
Really fun stuff. It would be cool (and time consuming) to add other significant events and see how things played out. For example, the Rise of Mo Harkless:Put together (I think) a fascinating little snapshot of our past 28 games, going back to when Dame first went out with his plantar fascia injury.
View attachment 8017
Basically, while Dame was out, CJ thrived. He had his first taste of running the team solo, and made the most of it. His FGA went up, his assists went up, and his overall efficiency and production went way up too.
Then, Dame came back, and CJ struggled for a couple weeks. He was basically taking as many shots as Dame, posting his lowest FG%'s of the season, and basically just looking uncomfortable out there. This culminated in the Philly game, arguably our worst performance of the year.
Then, they figured it out, and they've been firing on all cylinders ever since. CJ's lower FGA and AST totals suggest that he's re-accepted a more off-the-ball role, and that may have helped fuel their improved cohesion.
Post game interviews are way better with CJ and Dame...it's not even close...!
LMA +/-: +6.4
Spurs +/-: 12.4
So, in the 29.4 mpg he's in the game, they're +6.4 (+7.73/36)
In the 18.6 mpg he's not in the game, they're +6.0 (+11.6/36)
The Spurs seem to do a lot better when LMA is not in the game. The Spurs in general are struggling against the elite teams, and I've noticed that LMA is particularly struggling against top competition:
![]()
