DMT - The Chemistry of Death

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

magnifier661

B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
59,328
Likes
5,588
Points
113


Not answers, but a perspective of Terence McKenna and his idea of what DMT is about. He says we are currently living a chemistry of life, so why wouldn't there be a chemistry of death?
 
We are all one. Meaning, individuality is the vice. We all come from the same stuff, and when we pass, we unite with all the same stuff. This is another angle into life after death I suppose
 
A combined 46 minutes of a radio monologue without video. Is there a transcript so I can read it in about 4.6 minutes?
 
Quantum physics has shown that cause and effect does not necessarily apply at the level of subatomic particles (and smaller). Studies into consciousness are showing that quantum synchronicity, not cause and effect, may be what dictates how our brains function at the neural level, how we store and organize memories, how we develop a sense of self, etc.

All in all, quantum physics seems to be cementing what eastern and shamanic traditions have been teaching for thousands of years. Reality is not what it seems. Consciousness may in fact be the underlying fabric of a universe that is one giant hologram.

I encourage you to look into the holographic universe theories as well as the work of Fred Alan Wolf, aka Dr. Quantum. He puts things really simply, though does carry his presumptions a bit far sometimes.

“Ego is a structure that is erected by a neurotic individual who is a member of a neurotic culture against the facts of the matter. And culture, which we put on like an overcoat, is the collectivized consensus about what sort of neurotic behaviors are acceptable.” - Terence McKenna
 
The principles don't seem to differ a great deal, so I believe you.


You can draw a few moral parallels between the teachings of Jesus and Buddhism.

Otherwise the actual tenets are radically different and incompatible.
 
You can draw a few moral parallels between the teachings of Jesus and Buddhism.

Otherwise the actual tenets are radically different and incompatible.
Says you... But I don't align myself with just one theology. Why is that so important? Would that mean all atheist cannot be agnostic as well?

See evolution of philosophy and ideology is good. Labeling will only lead to racism and discrimination.
 
Whether it's semantically a religion or not is irrelevant. Traditional Buddhism is atheistic and has incompatible tenets than anything resembling traditional Christianity.
No it doesn't hold prejudice for any religion to adopt its philosophy. Which I clearly said I have. U are trying to use semantics to argue how I can't.
 
No it doesn't hold prejudice for any religion to adopt its philosophy. Which I clearly said I have. U are trying to use semantics to argue how I can't.


You can adopt whatever you want. I was disputing MarAzuls statement that the traditional principals don't differ much.
 
Well I don't have any idea what you base your difference with my statement on. There is not "Bible" to explain Buddhism, just the writings of monks. But from what I have read, the teachings of
Buddha are very similar to the teachings of Jesus. Now I really don't expect many Christian ministers to agree with me, most that I know of in the past would strongly disagree. But it is still my view.
I take it, you would agree with the Christians, and I accept that you have thoughtfully formed your opinion. I have another.
 
I think the key to really understanding DMT is through quantum physics' relation to consciousness.

Amd I don't know if we ever will. Einstein spent his final years trying to debunk/understand quantum mechanics and made no progress.
 
I think the key to really understanding DMT is through quantum physics' relation to consciousness.

Amd I don't know if we ever will. Einstein spent his final years trying to debunk/understand quantum mechanics and made no progress.
Many in the psychonauts community use the term "we are one". Meaning, I am you, you are me, we are the universe all the same. What does that mean?! Because we are all connected, interdimension travel is as easy as moving your hand.
 
The Godfather of consciousness theory: Plato

Plato argues that it is actually this life that is the shadow of reality and that upon being released from this life our souls are able to journey back to the truly real existence found among the Forms. For Plato, the physical world is a limitation on our knowledge, not something which makes life more full and complete. Thus, to loose the physical world is to be set free– the next life is a fuller life than this one, not less than it.

-Theory of the forms.

Also, his cave analogy is an interesting thought as well.
 
Many in the psychonauts community use the term "we are one". Meaning, I am you, you are me, we are the universe all the same. What does that mean?! Because we are all connected, interdimension travel is as easy as moving your hand.


It is as easy as moving your hand. With LSD in it to your mouth.
 
It is as easy as moving your hand. With LSD in it to your mouth.
Not necessarily. The molecules taken only give glimpse of the power of true reality. I doubt our organic bodies will ever really obtain the true power of one. When we pass we will
 
If we were living in a dreamers world populated by their subconscious then we would all be one of the same mind.
 
If he knew about evolution and modern neuroscience he would have had a different theory

Possibly.

But maybe not. Modern science has yet to figure out what exactly creates consciousness. Obama's "decade of the brain" project will try to do that - they'll only come up with more theories IMO. Scientists have been looking at a subatomic level and only have theories. Outside the origin of the universe I believe human consciousness is the biggest mystery to humans.
 
Possibly.

But maybe not. Modern science has yet to figure out what exactly creates consciousness. Obama's "decade of the brain" project will try to do that - they'll only come up with more theories IMO. Scientist have been looking at a subatomic level and only have theories. Outside the origin of the universe I believe human consciousness is the biggest mystery to humans.



Whatever consciousness is it's no mystery that it's a physically-dependent phenomenon - something that emerges from and relies on physical processes. Plato was smart enough so that he would have taken that into account.

FWIW a significant number of modern philosophers still take Platonic realism seriously when it comes to mathematical or moral "forms", but the application to the self or consciousness is not taken seriously.
 
Whatever consciousness is it's no mystery that it's a physically-dependent phenomenon - something that emerges from and relies on physical processes. Plato was smart enough so that he would have taken that into account.

FWIW a significant number of modern philosophers still take Platonic realism seriously when it comes to mathematical or moral "forms", but the application to the self or consciousness is not taken seriously.

Physically dependent? In what way?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top