Politics DNC/WASSERMAN I.T. SPY SCANDAL

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

MARIS61

Real American
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
28,007
Likes
5,012
Points
113
Shit's about to hit the fan!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...l-set-to-explode-with-possible-plea-deal.html

Democrats' IT scandal set to explode with possible plea deal

with possible plea deal
1497457720785.jpg

By Frank Miniter | Fox News
The curious case of Imran Awan, which sounds like an international spy thriller, is entering its third act. Awan was a congressional IT aide to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., and he was finally fired just after he was arrested trying to fly to Pakistan last summer.


Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, were charged last summer with bank fraud. They now appear poised to strike a plea deal with the Department of Justice. A plea agreement hearing is set for July 3 before U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan in Washington, Fox News reported Wednesday.


As I’ve dug deep into this case for my book “Spies in Congress” (out later this year), sources have made it clear that the bank fraud charges in this case, though very real, are just a way to hold the defendants.


Alleged theft of congressional equipment, massive data breaches of Congress members’ emails, likely espionage and more are all wrapped up in this case that involves data from 40 or more Democratic members of Congress.


Sources tell me that the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force has been looking into this matter since well before Awan and his crew of Pakistani congressional IT aides were booted off the House computer network in February 2017.


Sources also say that investigators were particularly interested in whether anyone else in the congressional offices that all of these IT aides worked for was involved in alleged improper activity. This might include Rep. Wasserman Schultz, who was the Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair when she employed Awan. It might also include former Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., who employed Awan when Becerra was chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. Becerra is now California attorney general.


“The House Office of Inspector General tracked the Awans network usage and found that a massive amount of data was flowing from the (congressional) networks,” said Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa. “Over 5,700 logins by the five Awan associates were discovered on a single server within the House, the server of the Democratic Caucus Chairman, then Rep. Xavier Becerra of California. Up to 40 or more members of Congress had all of their data moved out their office servers and onto the Becerra server without their knowledge or consent.”


Becerra left Congress in January 2017. Before he left, Capitol Police wanted a copy of the caucus server’s contents.


Becerra presumably told Imran Awan that Capitol Police wanted a copy of the server. What is known is that Awan did produce a copy of a server’s data for Capitol Police; however, after taking a look at the data they were provided, Capitol Police determined they were given a copy of data from some other server instead.


“Capitol Police found that the image (the copy of the server contents) they were supplied was false,” said Rep. Perry, quoting a report from the House Office of Inspector General.


So the Awans had access to – in fact, were copying – all the emails, personal schedules and other data from the Democrats they worked for to this server and, according to other reports, a Dropbox account.


Imran Awan was also going back to Pakistan for long stays and, in fact, at times worked remotely from Pakistan. This is where the case leads to possible espionage.


Meanwhile, court hearings on the alleged bank fraud Imran Awan and Hina Alvi have been charged with have been delayed again and again. The last hearing took place in October 2017.


The delays came as Department of Justice prosecutors and defense attorneys have been fighting it out over a laptop found in a cubbyhole (what was once a phone booth) in congressional office building that has the username “REPDWS” (a computer used by Imran Awan that is the property of Rep. Wasserman Schultz’s office).


What’s on this computer we can only surmise, but it is clear that Wasserman Schultz wants the evidence kept out of court. She even publicly threatened the chief of the Capitol Police with “consequences” if the laptop wasn’t returned.


Meanwhile, a House Office of Inspector General investigation determined that Awan and his crew (none of whom underwent background checks to gain the IT positions they held in Congress) committed numerous violations of House security policies.


There is a lot more to come from this explosive case. Before this plea agreement hearing was set the biggest worry was that the government’s odd failure to prosecute Awan for alleged thefts of government equipment (some of which were found in a garage of one of Awan’s rental properties) and the many alleged national security violations pointed to a political cover-up.


Now it appears the plot is set for a riveting climax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
Shit's about to hit the fan!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...l-set-to-explode-with-possible-plea-deal.html

Democrats' IT scandal set to explode with possible plea deal

with possible plea deal
1497457720785.jpg

By Frank Miniter | Fox News
The curious case of Imran Awan, which sounds like an international spy thriller, is entering its third act. Awan was a congressional IT aide to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., and he was finally fired just after he was arrested trying to fly to Pakistan last summer.


Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, were charged last summer with bank fraud. They now appear poised to strike a plea deal with the Department of Justice. A plea agreement hearing is set for July 3 before U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan in Washington, Fox News reported Wednesday.


As I’ve dug deep into this case for my book “Spies in Congress” (out later this year), sources have made it clear that the bank fraud charges in this case, though very real, are just a way to hold the defendants.


Alleged theft of congressional equipment, massive data breaches of Congress members’ emails, likely espionage and more are all wrapped up in this case that involves data from 40 or more Democratic members of Congress.


Sources tell me that the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force has been looking into this matter since well before Awan and his crew of Pakistani congressional IT aides were booted off the House computer network in February 2017.


Sources also say that investigators were particularly interested in whether anyone else in the congressional offices that all of these IT aides worked for was involved in alleged improper activity. This might include Rep. Wasserman Schultz, who was the Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair when she employed Awan. It might also include former Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., who employed Awan when Becerra was chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. Becerra is now California attorney general.


“The House Office of Inspector General tracked the Awans network usage and found that a massive amount of data was flowing from the (congressional) networks,” said Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa. “Over 5,700 logins by the five Awan associates were discovered on a single server within the House, the server of the Democratic Caucus Chairman, then Rep. Xavier Becerra of California. Up to 40 or more members of Congress had all of their data moved out their office servers and onto the Becerra server without their knowledge or consent.”


Becerra left Congress in January 2017. Before he left, Capitol Police wanted a copy of the caucus server’s contents.


Becerra presumably told Imran Awan that Capitol Police wanted a copy of the server. What is known is that Awan did produce a copy of a server’s data for Capitol Police; however, after taking a look at the data they were provided, Capitol Police determined they were given a copy of data from some other server instead.


“Capitol Police found that the image (the copy of the server contents) they were supplied was false,” said Rep. Perry, quoting a report from the House Office of Inspector General.


So the Awans had access to – in fact, were copying – all the emails, personal schedules and other data from the Democrats they worked for to this server and, according to other reports, a Dropbox account.


Imran Awan was also going back to Pakistan for long stays and, in fact, at times worked remotely from Pakistan. This is where the case leads to possible espionage.


Meanwhile, court hearings on the alleged bank fraud Imran Awan and Hina Alvi have been charged with have been delayed again and again. The last hearing took place in October 2017.


The delays came as Department of Justice prosecutors and defense attorneys have been fighting it out over a laptop found in a cubbyhole (what was once a phone booth) in congressional office building that has the username “REPDWS” (a computer used by Imran Awan that is the property of Rep. Wasserman Schultz’s office).


What’s on this computer we can only surmise, but it is clear that Wasserman Schultz wants the evidence kept out of court. She even publicly threatened the chief of the Capitol Police with “consequences” if the laptop wasn’t returned.


Meanwhile, a House Office of Inspector General investigation determined that Awan and his crew (none of whom underwent background checks to gain the IT positions they held in Congress) committed numerous violations of House security policies.


There is a lot more to come from this explosive case. Before this plea agreement hearing was set the biggest worry was that the government’s odd failure to prosecute Awan for alleged thefts of government equipment (some of which were found in a garage of one of Awan’s rental properties) and the many alleged national security violations pointed to a political cover-up.


Now it appears the plot is set for a riveting climax.
Indictments to follow any day now.
 
Fox is the world's largest cable news organization, and probably the most credible also. They link to stories from everywhere in the world, from every news source in the world, and sometimes they investigate further and supply more information that the original news source omitted/censored/never discovered.

I don't post Breitbart or Drudge, or even read them.

Most of what I post here is court-verified or Congress-verified, so I'm at a loss as to what you consider "a legit news source"?

The View? :dunno:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
Have you ever thought about just using a link rather than posting a novel that nobody will read

That "novel" as you call it took me about 90 seconds to read.

Have you ever thought about addressing your fear of reality? :dunno:
 
That "novel" as you call it took me about 90 seconds to read.

Have you ever thought about addressing your fear of reality? :dunno:

Spygate baby. Trump may soon see his wall come to fruition as in prison walls, lol
 
Fox is the world's largest cable news organization, and probably the most credible also. They link to stories from everywhere in the world, from every news source in the world, and sometimes they investigate further and supply more information that the original news source omitted/censored/never discovered.

I don't post Breitbart or Drudge, or even read them.

Most of what I post here is court-verified or Congress-verified, so I'm at a loss as to what you consider "a legit news source"?

The View? :dunno:

Fox news is a joke
 
Fox is the world's largest cable news organization, and probably the most credible also. They link to stories from everywhere in the world, from every news source in the world, and sometimes they investigate further and supply more information that the original news source omitted/censored/never discovered.

I don't post Breitbart or Drudge, or even read them.

Most of what I post here is court-verified or Congress-verified, so I'm at a loss as to what you consider "a legit news source"?

The View? :dunno:
He could be talking about Fox News and that would make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
@MARIS61 I legitimately challenge you to post something, anything that comes from a legit mainstream news source. Hard to take any of your posts seriously when every one is from Fox or Breitbart or Drudge or whatever...
What is a legitimate news source these days?
 
Fox is the world's largest cable news organization, and probably the most credible also. They link to stories from everywhere in the world, from every news source in the world, and sometimes they investigate further and supply more information that the original news source omitted/censored/never discovered.

I don't post Breitbart or Drudge, or even read them.

Most of what I post here is court-verified or Congress-verified, so I'm at a loss as to what you consider "a legit news source"?

The View? :dunno:

You mean this Fox News? < snicker> Love the Sara Palin valley girl

 
You mean this Fox News? < snicker> Love the Sara Palin valley girl


I know MSNBC is a little "left", but they're not a propaganda machine like Fox News is.
 
I know MSNBC is a little "left", but they're not a propaganda machine like Fox News is.

MSNBC and CNN are 100% propaganda, most of it purposely untruthful and slanderous. :beatinto:

They are exposed roughly twice a week for deliberately making shit up. :police:

Their lead story every day for the past 4 months was Stephanie Clifford. :press:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
I know MSNBC is a little "left", but they're not a propaganda machine like Fox News is.
You're joking, right? MSNBC is a graveyard. It is inhabited by sunken-eyed establishment agenda peddling zombies who were once bushy tailed young liberals out to change the world for the better. It is a mecca for willful ignorance. I know Fox news is trash but you can't seriously suggest MSNBC is a legitimate news source with a straight face, can you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
@MARIS61 I legitimately challenge you to post something, anything that comes from a legit mainstream news source. Hard to take any of your posts seriously when every one is from Fox or Breitbart or Drudge or whatever...
"Legit" and "mainstream" are two terms that directly contradict each other when referring to news sources. C'mon man, you're better than this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
Aside from right wing propaganda @jonnyboy, please tell us why a mainstream news source is not legitimate? How exactly do they contradict each other? What is not legit about the Los Angeles Times or NY Post? About KABC or WABC or NPR or the Washington Post or USA TODAY?

Take the Post for example. It got and printed the Pentagon Papers. It uncovered Watergate. It has won more Pulitzers than almost any one. Sounds pretty legit, and mainstream, to me.

So comeon man, I am really interested in your reasoned argument, using actual facts, as to what makes organizations like these illegitimate.

You can do that, right man? Prove me wrong. Prove you can actually make a coherent argument based on facts.
 
Aside from right wing propaganda @jonnyboy, please tell us why a mainstream news source is not legitimate? How exactly do they contradict each other? What is not legit about the Los Angeles Times or NY Post? About KABC or WABC or NPR or the Washington Post or USA TODAY?

Take the Post for example. It got and printed the Pentagon Papers. It uncovered Watergate. It has won more Pulitzers than almost any one. Sounds pretty legit, and mainstream, to me.

So comeon man, I am really interested in your reasoned argument, using actual facts, as to what makes organizations like these illegitimate.

You can do that, right man? Prove me wrong. Prove you can actually make a coherent argument based on facts.
While mainstream news sites may not blatantly lie regularly, they certainly have no problem with omitting the truth. If being mainstream is the bar you hold that's unfortunate. Considering many alternative news sites, whether they be left or right, are the only sources you can actually get certain news from. Ever heard of Palestinians being given 40 years sentences for rock-throwing? Probably not. How about the genocide that's happening right now in Yemen? If all you take in are mainstream news sources than I doubt you've heard of that either. Mainstream news only reports what is deemed healthy for the public to consume by the 6 or so corporations that own every major news media Outlet, left or right doesn't matter.
 
While mainstream news sites may not blatantly lie regularly, they certainly have no problem with omitting the truth. If being mainstream is the bar you hold that's unfortunate. Considering many alternative news sites, whether they be left or right, are the only sources you can actually get certain news from. Ever heard of Palestinians being given 40 years sentences for rock-throwing? Probably not. How about the genocide that's happening right now in Yemen? If all you take in are mainstream news sources than I doubt you've heard of that either. Mainstream news only reports what is deemed healthy for the public to consume by the 6 or so corporations that own every major news media Outlet, left or right doesn't matter.
This is all you need to know about American news. This and Fox being his propaganda machine. Two sides to same coin.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ent-has-fired-a-warning-shot-at-donald-trump/
 
You're joking, right? MSNBC is a graveyard. It is inhabited by sunken-eyed establishment agenda peddling zombies who were once bushy tailed young liberals out to change the world for the better. It is a mecca for willful ignorance. I know Fox news is trash but you can't seriously suggest MSNBC is a legitimate news source with a straight face, can you?

I didn't say anything about the legitimacy of MSNBC, just that Fox's commentators (not their news portion) is s pure propaganda machine, significantly worse than MSNBC's.

These aren't equal.

It's like saying that Phantom Menace wasn't a good movie but Last Jedi was a mile long steaming pile of shit. That's not saying that PM was the one of the better Star Wars movies, it wasn't. In fact, it was a horrible movie in itself. But that doesn't change the magnitude of just how much worse LJ was. It was a fresh pile of diarrhea.
 
There is no conspiracy theory from the depths of Breitbart of Alex Jones, no matter how stupid, improbable, or just plain ridiculous, that Trump won't approvingly tweet. And his tweets then become Holy Writ to his followers. Evidence? That's for losers. We just need Trump!
 
A news source is only legit if it tells you want you want to hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
some of you all mofo's need to watch this documentary.




trigger warning: Hillary Clinton is in the preview but it does not feature her.
 
Back
Top