Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 44,673
- Likes
- 28,792
- Points
- 113
I don't know how alarmed we should be by the following, so I thought I'd poll you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


I haven't seen anybody objecting to annual maintenance costs. That's not what this is about. Maybe it is in some ways since apparently the City has to fund upkeep as a condition of the state bond issue. That to the tune of 280M over the term of the 20 year bond sale....20M/yearAnd plus, that building is owned by the city, god forbid the city actually pay for its upkeep.
I mean, ffs.
Then pokemon go to the polls and VOTE100%
What are you even talking about?Then pokemon go to the polls and VOTE
Put your money where your mouth is and select an option in the poll above.What are you even talking about?
DonePut your money where your mouth is and select an option in the poll above.
Do we like rhetorical questions? Yes. Do we use them to make our point? Again yes? Does that mean they are always effective? No. Do I know what I am trying to say at this point? Again, no.Do I think Dundon bought the team with intentions to move it? No.
Do I think the City of Portland will negotiate a deal that is fair to the fans, the citizens, the city, and the team? No.
IMO, At least two of these entities are going to come out on the short end of this.
The team will never be one of them.
Have our new owners been in a room with the mayor and city council and clearly stated what they must have, want, really want? Yes
Do we have a clear understanding of what the Blazers want done to the Moda and what the terms of the 20 year lease would look like? No.
Technically, if they're rhetorical questions, they're not intended to be answered. Like "could Dundon be any more hateable?" (feel free to say it like Chandler Bing would).Do we like rhetorical questions? Yes. Do we use them to make our point? Again yes? Does that mean they are always effective? No. Do I know what I am trying to say at this point? Again, no.
yeah, as I said before, I think you're being way too optimisticI read the article and it still seams like they have very few of the people who will ultimately vote on this on record against the funding.
I guess we'll see but until I see a majority of any of the governmental bodies saying they're against it or more likely we get a report that the talks between the team and governments has stalled or stopped... I'm gonna stay very optimistic that the renovation of the arena will start next summer and the team will be locked into a deal keeping them here for the next 20 years.
I think people would be much better informed by reading this article instead of trying to digest Oram's alarmist muckraking:
![]()
‘Nowhere near a done deal’: Portland leaders buck pressure as clock ticks on Moda Center
The state says it needs to green light bonds by December, but Portland and Multnomah County have barely started negotiating the complex agreements required.www.oregonlive.com
that article looks more like what journalism used to look like. It actually tries to outline the issues and reservations a growing number of people in local government have. And it explains why the rushed process out of the state legislature is having brakes applied within the city limits
for instance, some people are finally saying "wait a minute...what specifically is that 600M funding package buying? And just as important, will it end up costing a lot more?". The reason the 2nd question is important is because any process that starts with a big bucket of money to pour over a problem usually requires a 2nd bucket of undetermined size. That almost seems axiomatic when it comes to government funding schemes. I mean, "600M for what exactly" seems like a question that should have been answered before now
I suspected this was not going to be the kind of smooth sailing thru the process many assumed. I think it's a valid position for local politicians to take to NOT want to pay for luxury suites; or at least not want to pay 100% of the cost. Yet apparently, that may be what Dundon is demanding
View attachment 84670
View attachment 84671
yeah, that's not going to be a quick process. And if there have been no negotiations with the Blazers yet, I can't see why NDA's would be required as local governments figure out how to spend public money on a publicly owned building
I'm still inclined to believe that the genesis of all this was when the City foolishly agreed to assume ownership of The Moda in 2024. That was a 29 year old building at the time and it was obviously in need of a major renovation of unknown cost. The Blazers have no skin in the moda game now
I would seriously like to know where you are looking that tells you the city needs to come up with 400M for this project when the state has already passed 365M, the county is reportedly going to fund 88M and the entire project is supposed to be 600M. Honestly if I've got something wrong I want to know.yeah, as I said before, I think you're being way too optimistic
that's not to say it won't eventually pass, but it's not clear sailing anymore. The easy lifting is done, but the nuts and bolts are are a jumble right now. Again, that the city is trying to come up with a 400M commitment for the Moda at the same time it's dealing with a 170M budget shortfall is an obstacle course thru a slow-moving bureaucracy.
personally, I think some of the council-people are finally asking the pertinent question: "600-650M for what exactly?". As far as I can tell, there is no engineering; no feasibility studies; no cost analysis; no planning and design. All that's doe so far is an intent to fill a bucket with 600-650M and pour it on the Moda. That's kind of crazy
one of the people who will vote on this are already saying NO to any public funding of luxury suites. That seems pretty reasonable to me unless th Blazers actually add some of their skin to the game....but reportedly they have no intention of doing so
This is 100% correct. The problem is that there are going to be people voting who don’t see this.Agreed. I didn't like it when that happened.
*Edit* However, I think this gets done. Dundon will get a great deal. Portland can't afford to lose the Blazers. Neither can Oregon.
I would seriously like to know where you are looking that tells you the city needs to come up with 400M for this project when the state has already passed 365M, the county is reportedly going to fund 88M and the entire project is supposed to be 600M. Honestly if I've got something wrong I want to know.
Also if you have an article or collection of articles that say they have enough city council members to kill this project, I'd like to know that as well. By my count it's 4 of the 12 that have said they will not vote in favor of funding the project. If I'm missing the 3 others that it would take with the Mayor a solid yes to fund, I would like to know that as well.
Sincerely, if you have this info I want to have it as well because if there is something to worry about, I'd like to be prepared.
Dundon can’t afford it eitherAgreed. I didn't like it when that happened.
*Edit* However, I think this gets done. Dundon will get a great deal. Portland can't afford to lose the Blazers. Neither can Oregon.
THEN HE SHOULDN’T HAVE BOUGHT THE DAMN TEAMDundon can’t afford it either
