Do you agree? Why or why not?

[BrianFromWA]

"I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration has done more in terms of the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration,"

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2016965870_apusobamaforeignpolicy.html
For the record, I think it was stupid for lower-tier candidates (like Santorum) to say that the President was "appeasing" terrorists. They should've attacked specific policies if they wanted to: bring up that you don't like how he's treated Israel or Hamas or Iran or whatever, but I saw this quote and wondered if I was missing something.

 

[DaLincolnJones]

yeah I agree, pretty weak.

Just like Mit attacking obummer on religion...wft is he thinking...

 

[MARIS61]

I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration has done more in terms of the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration,"

I'd say that's an accurate statement, or as Rooster Cogburn would say "No brag, just fact".

That said, he's President of The US, not Israel.

When he can truthfully say this administration has done more for the Freedom and Civil Rights for all Americans than any previous administration, then I'll listen.