Eastoff
But it was a beginning.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,087
- Likes
- 4,088
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I suppose there is less money in the fishing industry. Maybe ask Australians what they think about invasive species now that they've had some time and experience on the subject? It is quite a conundrum, I would suggest buildings lots of rail systems in place.
There's already a vast network of railroads in the north. The beef from the Chicago slaughterhouses has to get to the rest of the country somehow.
The Mississippi has always been a major means of transporting lots of goods and a source of our wealth. We don't need it though, if we can continue to borrow all the money we need.
Australia is a continent, but it's also an island. If you introduce any invasive species on an island, it wreaks havoc.
"Ideally it's the way to go, but many things that are ideal don't always come to fruition because there are too many other circumstances," he said. "They can still be contained, but only with concerted effort and a sense of urgency to do what is necessary on a timely basis."
I agree, but I also don't think it's good public policy to kill what's left of the golden goose for a state like Michigan (that tops the nation in unemployment, I do believe).
I was trying to say, the "best" solution is to say tough luck and keep the canals open. I don't know if they want other fish travelling these canals, maybe they can have locks or nets or something?
I study all this type of crap here in school in North Dakota. Locks and nets and things like that have yet to work.
What's all this I hear about people taking giant craps in the great lakes? That's a filthy filthy habit.
What? Oh. Giant carps. Nevermind! [/roseannadanna]
barfo