Eric Holder omitted Blagojevich link from questionnaire

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

PapaG

Banned User
BANNED
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
32,870
Likes
291
Points
0
Eric Holder omitted Blagojevich link from questionnaire...

Blagojevich and Holder appeared together at a March 24, 2004, news conference to announce Holder's role as "special investigator to the Illinois Gaming Board" -- a post that was to pay Holder and his Washington, D.C. law firm up to $300,000.

Holder, however, omitted that event from his 47-page response to a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire made public this week -- an oversight he plans to correct after a Chicago Sun-Times inquiry, Obama's transition team indicated late Tuesday.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1334978,CST-NWS-holder17web.article

Culture of Corruption is the new Change and Hope!

Seriously now, I have never witnessed in my life a President-elect immersed in scandal before he actually became the President.
 
Wow, that's huge. No doubt Holder is going to prison for a long, long time.

barfo
 
The Obama apologists are out in force.

Has anyone seen Rahm Emanuel this week?
 
Only if he gets reported to the e-FBI.


I reported to local law enforcement, not the FBI. I posted this at that time. What they do with the info is their issue, not mine. And how you lie about what I posted and who I informed, that's a "you" issue.
 
The Obama apologists are out in force.

Has anyone seen Rahm Emanuel this week?

I didn't see him last week either. I think he's avoiding me.

If you think the wiretaps show Rahm as a bad guy, why do you think they haven't charged him?

barfo
 
I didn't see him last week either. I think he's avoiding me.

If you think the wiretaps show Rahm as a bad guy, why do you think they haven't charged him?

barfo

I don't think he's a bad guy. I just wonder why he is in hiding.
 
I don't think he's a bad guy. I just wonder why he is in hiding.

Maybe he's working? He does have two jobs, y'know.

barfo
 
What's this have to do with Obama again? Holder lied, not Obama. Obama had no way to know.

Hmm, so the Junior Senator from Illinois has no idea what's going on in his own state? It's poor vetting in the best case, and shows what happens when you're so busy running for President that you don't bother to do your job.
 
Hmm, so the Junior Senator from Illinois has no idea what's going on in his own state? It's poor vetting in the best case, and shows what happens when you're so busy running for President that you don't bother to do your job.

Barack Obama is not the junior senator from Illinois.
 
Barack Obama is not the junior senator from Illinois.

He was when Eric Holder was hired by the State of Illinois.

Edit: Oops, my mistake. It was 2004, when he was a State Senator. And he still didn't know? That's even worse.
 
The Obama apologists are out in force.

Has anyone seen Rahm Emanuel this week?

No, and I'm pretty ticked off about it!

He promised he would stop by and fish a bit with me out back. :biglaugh:

Maybe he's busy trying to mitigate some of the damage Bush is doing to our country?
 
So, he's guilty of not remembering 1 of hundreds of press conferences he has had, this one 4 years ago?

This is why we have the death penalty.
 
Emmanuel sighting!

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1337789,CST-NWS-rahm18good.article

Emanuel talked directly to gov: source

DEEPER ROLE? | Pushed Jarrett for Senate seat
<!-- Article Publish Date -->
December 18, 2008

<!-- Article By Line --> BY NATASHA KORECKI Federal Courts Reporter nkorecki@suntimes.com
<!-- Article's First Paragraph -->
<!-- BlogBurst ContentStart --> President-elect Barack Obama's incoming chief of staff Rahm Emanuel had a deeper involvement in pressing for a U.S. Senate seat appointment than previously reported, the Sun-Times has learned. Emanuel had direct discussions about the seat with Gov. Blagojevich, who is is accused of trying to auction it to the highest bidder.

Emanuel talked with the governor in the days following the Nov. 4 election and pressed early on for the appointment of Valerie Jarrett to the post, sources with knowledge of the conversations told the Sun-Times. There was no indication from sources that Emanuel brokered a deal, however.

A source with the Obama camp strongly denied Emanuel spoke with the governor directly about the seat, saying Emanuel only spoke with Blagojevich once recently to say he was taking the chief of staff post.

But sources with knowledge of the investigation said Blagojevich told his aides about the calls with Emanuel and sometimes gave them directions afterward. Sources said that early on, Emanuel pushed for the appointment of Jarrett to the governor and his staff and asked that it be done by a certain date.

At least some of the conversations between Emanuel and Blagojevich were likely caught on tape, sources said.
After Jarrett took herself out of the running in mid-November, Emanuel submitted a list of suitable names to the governor's camp that didn't include her name.

Emanuel, who has refused to comment on the issue, is not accused of wrongdoing.

In portions of conversations released in a criminal complaint against Blagojevich, he can be heard complaining that Obama wouldn't give anything in return for a Jarrett appointment.
 
There's nothing wrong with Obama/Emmanuel trying to influence who gets the seat. That's just politics. As noted, Obama wouldn't give anything for the appointment, so there is no wrongdoing at all here.
 
So, he's guilty of not remembering 1 of hundreds of press conferences he has had, this one 4 years ago?
This is why we have the death penalty.

Did you miss the part about his firm being paid $300k, or did you just intentionally ignore it?
 
There's nothing wrong with Obama/Emmanuel trying to influence who gets the seat. That's just politics. As noted, Obama wouldn't give anything for the appointment, so there is no wrongdoing at all here.

You've heard all of the tapes?

Also, why didn't Emanuel/Obama go straight to the feds if Blago was asking them for conditions to be put on the seat?
 
You've heard all of the tapes?

Hasn't the prosecutor? If there were any indication that Obama/Rahm were willing to provide compensation, would he have gone out of his way to say that there was none? Also, Blagojevich specifically said that Obama wasn't willing to give him anything but appreciation, so "fuck him."

Also, why didn't Emanuel/Obama go straight to the feds if Blago was asking them for conditions to be put on the seat?

There's nothing reported that Blagojevich had actually demanded anything of Obama or Rahm. Blagojevich is stupid, but even he probably realizes that you don't try to blackmail, or demand illegal compensation, from the incoming President.

From what has been reported, my take is that Rahm, or some functionary connected to Rahm, communicated Obama's desire that Jarrett receive the seat, but Blagojevich, knowing he wouldn't get anything out of Obama, didn't want to go that route.
 
Hasn't the prosecutor? If there were any indication that Obama/Rahm were willing to provide compensation, would he have gone out of his way to say that there was none? Also, Blagojevich specifically said that Obama wasn't willing to give him anything but appreciation, so "fuck him."



There's nothing reported that Blagojevich had actually demanded anything of Obama or Rahm. Blagojevich is stupid, but even he probably realizes that you don't try to blackmail, or demand illegal compensation, from the incoming President.

From what has been reported
, my take is that Rahm, or some functionary connected to Rahm, communicated Obama's desire that Jarrett receive the seat, but Blagojevich, knowing he wouldn't get anything out of Obama, didn't want to go that route.

"What has been reported" is what has come from the Obama camp, but as Denny Crane posted, there is now some new information. I'm not saying anything criminal happened, but Obama's initial claims last week don't really jibe with the new information.

What did the President-elect know, and when did he know it?
 
Did you miss the part about his firm being paid $300k, or did you just intentionally ignore it?

Did you miss the part about Holder's firm not actually being hired after all, and thus not receiving any of the $300k? I'm confident you didn't intentionally ignore it.

barfo
 
You do realize this is the same prosecutor (Fitz!) who didn't go after Richard Armitage for what laypeople perceived as outing an undercover CIA agent, right?

Given past history, he might not go after any Obama people no matter what they did.
 
It came from federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, actually.

This whole thing does smack of the Clinton administration scandals. First it was a couple of FBI files they had, then it was a couple dozen, then it was hundreds, and when the full truth came out, it was thousands or tens of thousands. The truth did come out but not by their doing.

So much for transparency.

Where is Rahm?
 
You do realize this is the same prosecutor (Fitz!) who didn't go after Richard Armitage for what laypeople perceived as outing an undercover CIA agent, right?

Given past history, he might not go after any Obama people no matter what they did.

What's the connection (or similarity?) between Obama and Armitage?

barfo
 
What's the connection (or similarity?) between Obama and Armitage?

barfo

Not Obama, Rahm.

Seems that the guy who actually does the crime gets no attention and the guys at the periphery get the shaft with Fitz.
 
Not Obama, Rahm.

Seems that the guy who actually does the crime gets no attention and the guys at the periphery get the shaft with Fitz.

So Blago is at the periphery and Rahm is the central character here?

If that's the case, then Fitz needs to go to jail himself.

barfo
 
Back
Top