Executive Testifies on Senators' Mortgages

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Shapecity

S2/JBB Teamster
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Jan 30, 2003
Messages
45,018
Likes
57
Points
48
The Senate ethics committee has interviewed a former Countrywide Financial executive who testified under oath that Sens. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) and Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) were aware that they were accessing a special program to give below-market-rate mortgages to the powerful and famous when he arranged their loans, according to the executive's attorneys.

The statements from Robert Feinberg, who worked as a loan officer at the mortgage lender, stand in direct contradiction to statements made by Dodd and Conrad, who maintain that they did not know they were part of the Countrywide program created by its chief executive at the time, Angelo Mozilo.

"He always made a big deal about them being in the VIP program. Does he remember the exact words he spoke with Conrad and Dodd? No, but he always made it clear," said Elana Goldstein, one of Feinberg's attorneys.

Feinberg testified for several hours before the ethics committee on June 23. Questioning him were Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), ranking Republican Johnny Isakson (Ga.) and Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho). Dodd and Conrad responded to questions from the committee last year.

Battered by a swift decline in the market for subprime mortgages, Countrywide accepted a takeover offer from Bank of America in early 2008. Mozilo faces civil fraud and insider-trading charges in connection with Countrywide's lending practices.

"As the Dodds have said from the beginning, they did not seek or expect any special rates or terms on their loans, and they never received any," said Dodd spokesman Bryan DeAngelis. "We are glad to hear that Mr. Feinberg has met with the Senate ethics committee, so we can finally get to the bottom of this matter."

Conrad spokesman Christopher Gaddie said: "Senator Conrad never asked for, expected, or was aware of loans on any preferential terms."

A spokesman for the ethics committee declined to comment.

The Associated Press reported Monday night that Feinberg talked to the ethics committee.

Source: Washington Post
 
Republicans have had their share of scandals. Most of them sex related, for some reason. Democrats have a long line of corrupt people who line their own pockets.

As long as they're for extending unemployment benefits (as opposed promoting job creation), I guess the people shrug it off.
 
Republicans have had their share of scandals. Most of them sex related, for some reason. Democrats have a long line of corrupt people who line their own pockets.

As long as they're for extending unemployment benefits (as opposed promoting job creation), I guess the people shrug it off.

i thought u werent a republican? the republicans bamboozled the entire nation with their spurious claims of WMD's and used those same claims as a justification for a preemptive war. here's a list i found of the 20 most corrupt members of the congress: http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/. its a list dominated by republicans
 
i thought u werent a republican? the republicans bamboozled the entire nation with their spurious claims of WMD's and used those same claims as a justification for a preemptive war. here's a list i found of the 20 most corrupt members of the congress: http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/. its a list dominated by republicans

Republicans dominated politics. I think they're all corrupt to some degree.

However, even if your ridiculous claims that there was some deliberate lying about the WMDs, it sure appears to have been done for reasons other than lining their own pockets.

I see a very big difference between taking bribes and shaking down people for money for personal gain, and doing what it takes to make the country safer or the world a better place.

And no, I'm not a republican.

How can CREW's list be respected if it doesn't include these two or Barney Frank?

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/S...ed-special-discounted-mortgages-51952592.html

Daily Outrage: Congress VIPs knew they received special discounted mortgages

Staff reports
July 29, 2009



WHO: Sens. Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad (Democrats)

WHAT:
Despite their repeated denials, these powerful Senate Democrats were told from the start they were receiving heavily discounted mortgages, according to statements made to congressional investigators by the Countrywide Financial official who handled their loans. Countrywide ultimately lost billions of dollars on home loans to shaky borrowers before being acquired by Bank of America.

WHAT’S BEING DONE:
Dodd and Conrad are being actively investigated, as indicated by former Countrywide VIP loan director Robert Feinberg being called for closed-door testimony before the Senate Ethics Committee. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission has charged Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo with civil fraud and illegal insider trading.
 
Last edited:
Shocking.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OUTF03&show_article=1

Democrat resists subpoenaing VIP mortgage records

WASHINGTON (AP) - House Democrats have declined to subpoena available records that might reveal whether other members of Congress got discounted VIP mortgages from subprime lender Countrywide Financial Corp. similar to the sweetheart deals given Democratic Sens. Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad.

Republicans say they are willing to risk that the records now held by Bank of America may show that GOP lawmakers were also "friends of Angelo" who got preferential terms on personal mortgages at the behest of then-Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo.

Countrywide, after losing billions of dollars on defaulted subprime loans that triggered last year's financial crisis and the consequent recession, was taken over by Bank of America a year ago.

Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he has other work to do on the causes of and fixes for the financial crisis and will not interfere with other investigations of the VIP loans.

Towns' committee in recent months has focused on how much pressure the Federal Reserve and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson put on Bank of America to take over brokerage giant Merrill Lynch, another financial company with losses in the billions of dollars.

The senior Republican on Towns' committee, California Rep. Darrell Issa, has been trying for months to get Towns to subpoena Bank of America for Countrywide's records. He said in an interview with The Associated Press that he asked Towns again this week to issue the subpoena.

Any subpoena must be issued by the committee's chairman. But because Democrats control Congress, there are no Republican committee chairmen. Speaker Nancy Pelosi said through a spokesman Thursday that neither she nor her staff discussed the subpoena with Towns.

Daniel Frahm, a Bank of America spokesman, said the bank is ready to turn over the Countrywide VIP documents if it receives a subpoena. The bank's lawyer sent Issa the same message in a June letter.
"They have it packed and ready to go," Issa said in the interview.

The AP reported earlier this week that the Countrywide loan officer who handled the VIP mortgages for Dodd and Conrad provided secret testimony last month to the Senate Ethics Committee and Issa's committee staff investigators about the loan arrangements with the two senators.

Dodd, of Connecticut, chairs the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the housing and financial industries and is helping shepherd President Barack Obama's health care program in the Senate. Conrad, of North Dakota, chairs the Senate Budget Committee.

Others who have been found in the VIP program: Postmaster General John Potter; James Johnson, a former head of Fannie Mae who later stepped down as an adviser to Obama's presidential campaign; and Franklin Raines, who also headed Fannie Mae. Still other "friends" include retired athletes, a judge, a congressional aide and a newspaper executive.

Issa said a subpoena is the only way to learn the full story of how the VIP program "was used as a tool by Countrywide to buy influence and who was involved."

"It's well over a year that this (the Countrywide VIP program) has been known to be going on. We know only a fraction of the names who sought or accepted preferential treatment," he said. "You can't do government oversight if you protect your friends."

Towns said his committee is now focused on overseeing the $787 billion stimulus program aimed at helping bring the country out of the recession and investigating what role the lack of government oversight played in the financial crisis.

He said the Countrywide VIP program "is the subject of current proceedings before the Justice Department and Senate Ethics Committee and it is not appropriate for the committee to interfere with those proceedings."

Both Dodd and Conrad denied seeking special terms. Dodd's mortgages were for residences in Connecticut and Washington; Conrad's were for a Delaware beach house and an eight-unit apartment building in Bismarck, N.D.

Dodd insists he did not receive special treatment because similar rates were available from other lenders. Conrad, after initially denying that he received discounts, changed course after reviewing documents showing he got special treatment. He announced he was donating $10,500 to charity and refinancing the loan on the apartment building with another lender.

Robert Feinberg, who worked in Countrywide's VIP section, told both Issa's investigators and the Senate Ethics Committee that Dodd and Conrad were made aware that they were getting special deals on their mortgages.

The Ethics Committee's investigation is limited to whether the two senators violated standards of conduct, and the committee has no jurisdiction beyond investigating senators or Senate employees.
It is unclear whether the Justice Department is still investigating Dodd, Conrad or the Countrywide VIP program.

Elana Goldstein, one of Feinberg's lawyers, said Justice Department prosecutors interviewed Feinberg last October but have not contacted her or her client since then.
 
Nothing to see here. Move along. :sigh:

Something tells me the minutes it will take to approve a subpoena will occur AFTER the 2010 elections.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top