OT Father Kills Man Who Pointed Guns At his Kids

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

I’m a staunch proponent of stricter gun control laws but (based on the currently available information) this guy is my hero......

 

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

http://time.com/5055759/father-shoots-robber-texas-popeyes/ Oops....forgot to post the link!

 

[riverman]

pointing guns at children is a crime against humanity...what a horrible thing for kids to experience

 

[MarAzul]

A clear case of defending yours with the force of arms when necessary. Thank you Mr. Madison.
Even those dubious of your amendment can see the need when a clear example is before them.

 

[MarAzul]

pointing guns at children is a crime against humanity...what a horrible thing for kids to experience

Yes, but he won't do it again.

 

[riverman]

worth pointing out he didn't need a machine gun to protect his family

 

[riverman]

A clear case of defending yours with the force of arms when necessary

yeah..but in a better world neither of them would have had a gun in a restaurant full of kids...especially one pointed at kids

 

[MarAzul]

worth pointing out he didn't need a machine gun to protect his family

You do know, machine guns have already been restricted, years ago.

 

[riverman]

Yes, but he won't do it again.

Those kids will see this over and over for a lifetime...so in a way...he will

 

[MarAzul]

yeah..but in a better world neither of them would have had a gun in a restaurant full of kids...especially one pointed at kids

Hey, that could sell! If it is put with the right tune.

 

[MarAzul]

yeah..but in a better world neither of them would have had a gun in a restaurant full of kids...especially one pointed at kids

Ha!
Actually this comment is classic.
One fellow broke the law here.
The liberal's solution is to change the law so that neither can have arms.
No doubt, only one man will ignore the new law.
The other lost the means to enforce his right to protect those he should.

 

[rasheedfan2005]

Ha!
Actually this comment is classic.
One fellow broke the law here.
The liberal's solution is the change the law so that neither can have arms.
No doubt, only one man will ignore the new law.
The other lost the means to enforce his right to protect those he should.

Im growing tired of the liberal lack of logic on gun control laws. I think im at a point where they can just come and take them if they want them.

 

[MarAzul]

Those kids will see this over and over for a lifetime...so in a way...he will

They also witnessed a long standing right of man be enforced by father.

 

[MarAzul]

Im growing tired of the liberal lack of logic on gun control laws. I think im at a point where they can just come and take them if they want them.

umm, maybe not.

 

[rasheedfan2005]

umm, maybe not.

They have to come unarmed to avoid being a hypocrite of course.

 

[dviss1]

You do know, machine guns have already been restricted, years ago.

Um... The Brady bill expired under Bush...

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5946127/ns/politics/t/congress-lets-assault-weapons-ban-expire/

 

[dviss1]

Ha!
Actually this comment is classic.
One fellow broke the law here.
The liberal's solution is to change the law so that neither can have arms.
No doubt, only one man will ignore the new law.
The other lost the means to enforce his right to protect those he should.

Soooooo, let's give guns to the kids!!!!!

 

[PtldPlatypus]

Um... The Brady bill expired under Bush...

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5946127/ns/politics/t/congress-lets-assault-weapons-ban-expire/

The Brady Bill assault weapon ban covered large-magazine semi-automatic weapons. The ban on fully automatic weapons is a completely different law (the Firearm Owners' Protection Act of 1986), which is still active.

 

[riverman]

The liberal's solution is to change the law so that neither can have arms.

you just assume a lot about people you've never met sometimes
damned left wing bartenders from the wild west...what was wrong with them?

 

[MarAzul]

you just assume a lot about people you've never met sometimes
View attachment 17355 damned left wing bartenders from the wild west...what was wrong with them?

I can see the logic. Suspend a few rights while operating with impaired judgement.

 

[dviss1]

I can see the logic. Suspend a few rights while operating with impaired judgement.

Right. So then you can also see how this is illogical?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...w-allowing-guns-in-bars-idUSTRE75T7BX20110630

Ohio governor signs law allowing guns in bars

COLUMBUS, Ohio (Reuters) - Ohio Republican Governor John Kasich on Thursday signed into law a bill that allows gun owners in the state to carry concealed weapons into bars and other places where alcohol is served.

The measure, which was forwarded to Kasich on June 22 by the Ohio General Assembly, was signed on Thursday afternoon. Kasich is scheduled to sign the Ohio budget later Thursday.

Businesses can ban concealed weapons on their premises for safety reasons if the want to and some, like the Cincinnati Bengals football team, have indicated they will continue to bar gun owners from bringing firearms into the stadium.

The law also prohibits gun owners from consuming alcohol or being under the influence of alcohol or drugs when they carry their weapons into bars.

The new laws allow residents to carry concealed handguns into licensed establishments in the state, including shopping malls and sporting venues.

The new law also allows a person with a concealed carry license to transport a loaded handgun in a motor vehicle without securing it in a holster, case, bag or box -- and allows them to remove a handgun from a secure location.

Opponents of the laws had said that mixing guns and alcohol would endanger public safety. Supports argued that the laws bring Ohio into line with other states that have concealed carry rules.

 

[dviss1]

And here I thought I respected Kasich.... Dumbass...

 

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

I can see the logic. Suspend a few rights while operating with impaired judgement.

By your logic the entire state of Alabama should be barred from gun ownership.........

 

[MarAzul]

By your logic the entire state of Alabama should be barred from gun ownership.........

Aw come on UC! You wouldn't call an entire State impaired out of pure hate! I just know you wouldn't.

 

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

Aw come on UC! You wouldn't call an entire State impaired out of pure hate! I just know you wouldn't.

You are absolutely correct sir! My bad. I only meant the part of Alabama who would vote for a morally and ethically bankrupt individual like Roy Moore. Thank you for pointing out my error!

 

[MarAzul]

You are absolutely correct sir! My bad. I only meant the part of Alabama who would vote for a morally and ethically bankrupt individual like Roy Moore. Thank you for pointing out my error!

Well just to be honest. I would vote for the fool too. Then sack him as disgusting, unfit for the office, so the Governor can appoint a replacement.

 

[Chris Craig]

Well just to be honest. I would vote for the fool too. Then sack him as disgusting, unfit for the office, so the Governor can appoint a replacement.

How conniving. Not only is that dirty it's muddy

 

[MarAzul]

How conniving

Well the choice isn't actually before me, but I would do it without remorse.

 

[Further]

1) fuck ya!
2) I’d also be packing heat at Popeyes but in the form of Hot Sauce.
3) none of the restrictions most folks are talking about would have affected this good citizen but over time they may get more weapons out of the hands of thieves.
4) great mashed potatoes and gravy.
5) poor kids, that’s got to be so traumatic but at least none of the good guys were injured.

 

[Natebishop3]

worth pointing out he didn't need a machine gun to protect his family

This is why it's hard to debate gun laws because most people don't seem to even understand the difference between a fully automatic weapon (AKA a machine gun) and a semi-automatic weapon (aka an AR-15).