Fire McMuffin/Assclown/McMillan!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

PapaG

Banned User
BANNED
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
32,870
Likes
291
Points
0
Hasn't he heard that the team is supposed to give up the season?

:dunno:
 
Hasn't he heard that the team is supposed to give up the season?

:dunno:

We're losing out on John Wall. :dunno:

John Wall is good. :dunno:

I'm just relaying facts here. :dunno:
 
I think Nate is wonderful with young, over-achievers.

He must get them pumped or something?



Question remains: How is he with a solid team....with a 'baked cake?'
 
Papa was waiting for this post lol hiding out in the bushes, trying to duck red light.
 
Papa was waiting for this post lol hiding out in the bushes, trying to duck red light.

As usual, I have no idea what message you are trying to convey. Perhaps you should start a thread about it?
 
I think Nate is wonderful with young, over-achievers.

He must get them pumped or something?



Question remains: How is he with a solid team....with a 'baked cake?'


You are now calling Bayless an overachiever? Why don't you just finally admit that your talent evaluation skills suck fat dick?
 
McMillian's poor coaching cost us a win in Orlando. We should have won that game, just about any other coach would have got us a victory. Pathetic.

He has a roster full of players who have played multiple seasons on winning teams and advanced deep in the playoffs, most college coaches could get more out of his roster.

Nate said this team has to work on Christmas because he hates Santa... he also hunts puppies and steals coats from the homeless.
 
thread_sucks.jpg
 
This is clearly Nate's fault.

If he would pay his debts to Luigi "knuckles" Lomax, he would stop whacking Blazer players on the knee with a lead pipe.
 
To get to the original point, has anyone doubted that Nate's a good coach when it comes to "motivation", "character", "scrap", "discipline", etc?

But are you saying that you agree with Nate's call that it took injuries to 6 of his top 7 players (LMA being the exclusions) to get Bayless more minutes than Blake? Even during his "'breakout", 29-point PHX performance Bayless was played 6 minutes less than Blake.

Or you agree with his insistence on playing Miller 29mpg in December and having him shoot higher than 50% in only 3 of his 12 games, but average almost 11 shots per game?

Due to injuries, Nate's been unable to do a lot of the things people called for his firing over. For instance, he gets a lot of credit from me for putting his best 7 players out on the floor for a majority of the minutes, and give maybe 2 guys the leftovers. Unfortunately, it took 6 injuries to his top 7 players for him to do so. But that's ok, if he really did learn from it. He gets credit from me for the guys finally starting to push the ball down the court and look for easy opportunities early in the clock. Amazingly enough, it hasn't led to Turnover City like he predicted it would. But how much of that is Bayless and Miller with the ball in their hands rather than Blake and/or Roy?

Our team defense being better this last few games may potentially correlate to players playing in their natural positions much more than before. Specifically, Webster (our best defender left) being on the floor for ~30mpg at the 3 (rather than, say, Rudy or Roy) seems much more natural and effective.

Honestly, I love what he's done the last few games bringing Howard up to the FT line for open jumpers, rather than just running the LMA pick-and-slide or pick-and-pop when Roy doesn't Iso. Again, how much of that is gameplanning that happened b/c of injury necessity? And will he revert to stagnation once guys start coming back?
 
Last edited:
Fire PopG. Go.

er papaG. whatever.
fire him, and purge the blazer board1!!
 
See, I don't understand that, so we are even lol

His point was that no one agreed with the post that implied PapaG played the role of the victim.

Valid point? I dunno. But I think that's what he's saying.

Ed O.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top