Fox News: 10 Straight Years @ #1 In Cable News

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
..and no wonder, They're the best in the biz....by far.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/fox-news-top-cable-net-celebrates-10-years-145314917.html

ailes-fnc.jpg


Last fall, Fox News celebrated its 15th anniversary with a lavish party in New York. Fox News president Roger Ailes, who launched the channel in 1996, toasted 700 or so staffers that night, telling them, "Losing is highly overrated as a learning experience."

On Tuesday afternoon, when Nielsen releases its final ratings for the month of January, the "fair and balanced" network will mark an arguably more important milestone: 10 consecutive years at the top of the cable news rankings.

Yahoo News recently spoke will Bill Shine, Fox News Channel's EVP of programming, about the significance of the achievement, the state of cable news, and how the cable network has managed to sustain its pole position while defending Fox from its fervent critics, including Jon Stewart.

Yahoo News: So, are you going to frame the Nielsen report?

Shine: No, no. We don't do a lot of that around here. We may pat each other on the back, but the news goes on. We'll keep it rolling.

What's been the key to maintaining your no. 1 position in cable news?

A couple of things. Roger's leadership. He had the idea, he launched the network, he hired the talent. So it's been Roger, Roger's vision. Over the years we've gained the trust of the American people. And Roger picked good people, not just on-air, but the producers and everyone behind the scenes who have contributed to our success.

What would you say is the best strategic move the network has made over the last 10 years?

I don't know if I could single out one thing. What happened was—keep in mind, over the course of those 10 years, a lot of news has happened. You had an impeachment, the 2000 election, Bush-Gore, of course 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, the Middle East, hurricanes, Katrina, the D.C. sniper, natural disasters, politics. So there's been a lot of news. Then, what you had happen was, those viewers who came in for the big story stayed to sample our programming. More and more of those people stayed. At the same time, we had a lot of people talking about us, on talk radio and in the news media, the media press, talking about what we do. So it was also about us getting recognized for what we were doing.

Worst move/biggest mistake? There has to be one.

Hmm. That's a great question. [Pause.] I'm not dodging you, but I'd have to think about it. Ask me some other questions and I'll think about it. Everybody makes mistakes. You spend your whole day trying to avoid them, and then own up to them when you do make them.

Just to be clear, I'm not talking about an on-air mistake. I'm talking strategically.
Yeah, not like [the time] we spelled Obama's name wrong.

Right.

Well, here's something: Very, very early on, it did take a couple of years to figure out who we were. We used to have this segment called "Fox On" where it would be 10 or 15 or 20 minute blocks of "Fox On Sports," or "Fox On Art." And then we'd have to interrupt "Fox On Art" to carry a White House briefing. Hindsight being 20/20, that was a pretty bad idea.

Then, of course, Bill O'Reilly. When we first hired Bill, he was on at 6. It was a few years before Roger said, you know, we should put this guy on at 8, in primetime.

What do you look for when you are courting on-air talent?

The main thing you want to know if they are smart, if they're entertaining, if they're intelligent, if they have a natural curiosity about the world. If that comes through in an interview, then it should come through on television. Roger always tells us, "Watch TV with the sound down. If you have the urge to turn the sound up, to hear what they're saying, that's someone you want to hire."

According to a recent poll, Fox News is the most-trusted name news network. But according to the same poll, it's also the least-trusted. When you see polls like that, what is your reaction? You obviously have a core of people who trust you, and a core of people who don't. How do you approach the people who don't trust you?

You don't know me, but I'm not a cocky guy. And I don't want this to sound cocky, but I don't pay too much attention to them... I think the people who don't trust us, some of them watch and just don't trust us. But some may see something written about us on the Internet and latch onto it. What I find is that they don't trust us, but have never watched us. I think if people just spent a little time watching us, they'd have a different opinion. But to be honest I don't think much about them. I spend a lot of time thinking about improving what's on the screen.

Fox News is no. 1, but with that comes plenty of critics, especially when it comes to worldview. When Jon Stewart was a guest on your network, with Bill O'Reilly on "The Factor," he argued that "there is a selective outrage machine here at Fox that pettifogs only when the narrative suits them." What is your reaction to that?
A couple things. Stewart is not a writer. He's a comedian. He has a lot of writers who write for him. And they come up with some great lines. So I'm not even sure he came up with that himself, but let's just say he did. It's his opinion, he can say whatever he wants.

If you look at our lineup, our stable of talent, it's the most [ideologically] diverse of anyone on cable. Starting with our news journalists, to our primetime programming. Watch Bill O'Reilly tonight. His Talking Points Memo, which I just read, is very balanced. Then watch Hannity, who is our conservative. Make no mistake, we pay him to be our conservative. Then watch Greta at 10. If you take that lineup, and add our news journalists during the afternoon, it's the most balanced out there. You get all sorts of opinions. You look at other networks, that doesn't happen.

What about the criticism that Fox is a farm team for the GOP? A place where people like Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee can go after their campaigns are over?

I actually think it's a bit of jealousy. [The candidates] get calls from the other networks, asking them to come work for them. The two you mentioned, they got calls from other networks. The other networks tried to hire them. But they decided to come work here. We're happy about it.

But doesn't hiring ex-Republican candidates make it harder for you to back up the "fair and balanced" mantra?

No, not at all. Look, we hired [former Democratic Sen.] Evan Bayh within the last year. If you look at our whole lineup, we have [FNC analyst and former campaign manager for Walter Mondale] Bob Beckel, [Democratic strategist and Fox News political analyst] Doug Schoen, people like that. It's very balanced.

The perception is that CNN is great when there's breaking news, and Fox is great at opinion coverage. Does that stigma concern you at all?

Sure. Look, the culture around here isn't, "We're no. 1, everything is great, let's take it easy, everybody take a three-day weekend." We're always looking to improve our breaking news programming. There are viewers who will always turn to CNN instinctively if there's a big or breaking news story. The question is, how do they keep them coming back? It seems like they've had a hard time doing that.

It's been a struggle.
Do you watch CNN? Do you watch their debates?

Of course, of course. I have six TVs in my office. Everybody watches everybody else. You want to know what your competition is up to.

What are the TVs in your office tuned to?

Fox News Channel. Fox Business. CNN. MSNBC. The local Fox-5 affiliate in New York. And—don't tell anyone this—the Golf Channel.
 
Liberal media bias! The liberals control the majority of the viewers... wait no... fox news controls the majority of cable news. So that must mean there is a conservative bias in news.
 
A new study by the Pew Research Study shows that viewers of the Daily Show and the Colbert Report have the highest knowledge of national and international affairs, while Fox News viewers rank nearly dead last:

pewtv.GIF


The results about Fox News echo findings of previous surveys. In 2003, University of Maryland researchers studied the public’s belief in three false claims — that Iraq possessed WMD, that Iraq was involved in 9/11, and that there was international support for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

The researchers stated, “The extent of Americans’ misperceptions vary significantly depending on their source of news. Those who receive most of their news from Fox News are more likely than average to have misperceptions.” Fox News viewers were “three times more likely than the next nearest network to hold all three misperceptions.”

This is an article from 2007 by ThinkProgress based on this study.

Here is another relevant image from the study:

319-2.gif
 
Last edited:
I'm a liberal and I find myself watching Fox News a lot. Just to see what they're going to say. O'Reilly always cracks me up. Their morning show Fox and Friends is hilarious. The guy on there that acts like uncle Joey from Full House and the super conservative old blonde chick that gets on my nerves.

Its kinda like the Jim Spagg show. Grotesque and stupid, but for some reason you end up checking in here or there.
 
There's a sucker born every minute.

The ratings measure only viewers who still get their news by watching it on a television set mostly because they don't know how to work a computer, something few educated Americans bother with.

Among smart folks, they drop to #10.

http://news.nettop20.com/
 
I only watch BBC News, WSJ podcasts and Al Jazeera, so I'm better than you all.
 
I'll grab a story online through a search engine and after reading it click other news links that catch my eye. Through this process I have found some great websites that I will revisit, and I get a wider selection of viewpoints and sources.

I haven't watched news on the tv even one time since moving to Beautiful Central Oregon 10 years ago.

It's simply too time consuming, dumbed-down and uninformative to bother with.
 
Last edited:
I haven't watched news on the tv even one time since moving to Beautiful Central Oregon 10 years ago.

It's simply too time consuming, dumbed-down and uninformative to bother with.

No kidding. There's nothing quite like whiling away the hours, arguing topics of religion with the likes of Magnifier.
 
No kidding. There's nothing quite like whiling away the hours, arguing topics of religion with the likes of Magnifier.

Hey! Don't be dissin' my favorite brickwall :banghead:
 
Saying Fox news is #1 because they are a quality establishment is like saying that McDonalds in #1 because it's good food
 
Saying Fox news is #1 because they are a quality establishment is like saying that McDonalds in #1 because it's good food

I like O'Reilly. He's a hoot. Hannity is a blowhard. I like Greta's guests. Plus she's pretty low-key with them, which seems to bring good conversational interviews. Huckabee is my fave. Have always admired him. That's about all I watch.
 
I like O'Reilly. He's a hoot. Hannity is a blowhard. I like Greta's guests. Plus she's pretty low-key with them, which seems to bring good conversational interviews. Huckabee is my fave. Have always admired him. That's about all I watch.

I like the McFlurry. It's delicious. The Big Mac is too greasy. I like the toys in the happy meals. Plus, they don't take up too much space so I never throw them away. Chicken McNuggets are my fave. I have always admired them. That's about all I eat.
 
I like the McFlurry. It's delicious. The Big Mac is too greasy. I like the toys in the happy meals. Plus, they don't take up too much space so I never throw them away. Chicken McNuggets are my fave. I have always admired them. That's about all I eat.

Heh, you're probably a fatso.
 
Um I get my news from business channels and the internet. There's no point in someone with a sociology degree, trying to give me business advice.
 
I'm a liberal and I find myself watching Fox News a lot. Just to see what they're going to say. O'Reilly always cracks me up. Their morning show Fox and Friends is hilarious. The guy on there that acts like uncle Joey from Full House and the super conservative old blonde chick that gets on my nerves.

Its kinda like the Jim Spagg show. Grotesque and stupid, but for some reason you end up checking in here or there.

I cannot stand to watch the morning show on Fox. I watch Morning Joe on MSNBC because at least the people on it are entertaining, if not horribly misguided.
 
http://www.firstshowing.net/2012/the-muppets-strike-back-at-fox-news-after-brainwashing-reports/

This is painful to watch. It is like someone trying to convince you that professional wrestling is a real sport or we didn't land on the moon, or worse yet... the moon is cheese and owned by a rich businessman who herds unicorns and poops 'fun' sized candy that we all buy for halloween, and it is the liberal bias media trying to brainwash our kids into believing it is nothing but a pile of rocks. (Plus some random anti Obama reference)
 
http://www.firstshowing.net/2012/the-muppets-strike-back-at-fox-news-after-brainwashing-reports/

This is painful to watch. It is like someone trying to convince you that professional wrestling is a real sport or we didn't land on the moon, or worse yet... the moon is cheese and owned by a rich businessman who herds unicorns and poops 'fun' sized candy that we all buy for halloween, and it is the liberal bias media trying to brainwash our kids into believing it is nothing but a pile of rocks. (Plus some random anti Obama reference)

and that is why i'm amazed anyone takes any of the fox 'news' stations seriously. i'm fine if you want to have that viewpoint but to bring a guest like the professor on (who seemed to be the only actual qualified opinion) and then give her very little response time and attempt to talk over her is laughable.
 
90% of the news is negative/bad news. It's such a buzz kill.

Obviously, the majority of the Fox News viewership likes them to dumb-down the negative/bad news for them.
 
I like the McFlurry. It's delicious. The Big Mac is too greasy. I like the toys in the happy meals. Plus, they don't take up too much space so I never throw them away. Chicken McNuggets are my fave. I have always admired them. That's about all I eat.

Good thing. :)

pinkslime.jpg


McDonald's announced last week that, as of last August, is has stopped using ammonium hydroxide in the production of its hamburgers. MSNBC reports that the chemical, used in fertilizers, household cleaners and even homemade explosives, was also used to prepare McDonalds' hamburger meat.
And while the announcement is making headlines, you may (or may not) want to know about some other unusual chemicals being used in the production of some of our most-popular foods:
The International Business Times lists some other questionable chemicals showing up in our foods:

Propylene glycol: This chemical is very similar to ethylene glycol, a dangerous anti-freeze. This less-toxic cousin prevents products from becoming too solid. Some ice creams have this ingredient; otherwise you'd be eating ice.

Carmine: Commonly found in red food coloring, this chemical comes from crushed cochineal, small red beetles that burrow into cacti. Husks of the beetle are ground up and forms the basis for red coloring found in foods ranging from cranberry juice to M&Ms.

Shellac: Yes, this chemical used to finish wood products also gives some candies their sheen. It comes from the female Lac beetle.

L-cycsteine: This common dough enhancer comes from hair, feathers, hooves and bristles.

Lanolin (gum base): Next time you chew on gum, remember this. The goopiness of gum comes from lanolin, oils from sheep's wool that is also used for vitamin D3 supplements.

Silicon dioxide: Nothing weird about eating sand, right? This anti-caking agent is found in many foods including shredded cheese and fast food chili.

So, what moved McDonald's to make the change in their hamburger production? In a statement posted on its website, McDonald's senior director of quality systems Todd Bacon wrote:

"At the beginning of 2011, we made a decision to discontinue the use of ammonia-treated beef in our hamburgers. This product has been out of our supply chain since August of last year. This decision was a result of our efforts to align our global standards for how we source beef around the world."
The U.S. Agriculture Department classifies the chemical as "generally recognized as safe." McDonald's says they stopped using the chemical months ago and deny the move came after a public campaign against ammonium hydroxide by celebrity chef Jamie Oliver.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sidesho...ger-using-pink-slime-chemicals-171209662.html
 
So.... liberals get their news from bozo the clown?

Seems about right.

The graph doesn't mention political views at all.

It is drawn on knowledge levels and you just admitted liberals are the most knowledgeable Americans.

And that Comedy Central is the most informative news channel in America.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top