Georgia Girl Sues Classmates For Bullying Her On Facebook

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

PapaG

Banned User
BANNED
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
32,870
Likes
291
Points
0
If the cops can't do anything, and if Facebook won't take down the fake profile, I'd probably sue as well, just to make a point. I'd add Facebook as a defendant, too, since obviously they knew it was wrong, considering they took down the phony page when the lawsuit was filed.

http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2012/05/01/georgia-girl-sues-classmates-for-bullying-her-on-facebook/


ATLANTA (AP) — When a Georgia middle school student reported to police and school officials that she had been bullied on Facebook, they told her there was not much they could do because the harassment occurred off campus.

So the 14-year-old girl, Alex Boston, is using a somewhat novel strategy to fight back: She’s slapping her two classmates with a libel lawsuit.

As states consider or pass cyberbullying laws in reaction to high-profile cases around the country, attorneys and experts say many of the laws aren’t strong enough, and lawsuits such as this one are bound to become more commonplace.

“A lot of prosecutors just don’t have the energy to prosecute 13-year-olds for being mean,” said Parry Aftab, an attorney and child advocate who runs stopcyberbullying.org. “Parents are all feeling very frustrated, and they just don’t know what to do.”

Almost every state has a law or other policy prohibiting cyberbullying, but very few cover intimidation outside of school property.

Alex, who agreed to be identified to raise awareness about cyberbullying, remembers the mean glances and harsh words from students when she arrived at her suburban Atlanta middle school. She didn’t know why she was being badgered until she discovered the phony Facebook page. It was her name and information, though her profile picture was doctored to make her face appear bloated.

The page suggested Alex smoked marijuana and spoke a made-up language called “Retardish.” It was also set up to appear that Alex had left obscene comments on other friends’ pages, made frequent sexual references and posted a racist video. The creators also are accused of posting derogatory messages about Alex.

“I was upset that my friends would turn on me like that,” she told The Associated Press. “I was crying. It was hard to go to school the next day.”

Alex learned of the phony page a year ago and told her parents, who soon contacted administrators at Palmer Middle School and filed a report with Cobb County Police.

“At the time this report was taken in May 2011, we were not aware of any cyberbullying law on the books that would take her specific situation and apply it to Georgia law,” said Cobb County police spokesman Sgt. Dana Pierce.

Police encouraged the Boston family to report the fake account to Facebook. Alex’s family said despite requests to Facebook to take the page down, the company did not do so. The website was taken down around the time the lawsuit was filed a week ago.

Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes and Cobb County school officials declined comment on the case. The two students named in the lawsuit haven’t hired an attorney and their parents couldn’t be reached for comment.


The thorny issue of whether schools may censor students who are off campus when they attack online has led to split decisions in federal courts. Administrators and judges have wrestled over whether free speech rights allow students to say what they want when they’re not at school.

Justin Layshock of western Pennsylvania was suspended after he created a MySpace parody in 2005 that said his principal smoked marijuana and hid beer behind his desk. The suspension was overturned by a federal judge, who found that school officials failed to show the student’s profile disrupted school operations. The judge’s decision was later upheld by an appeals court.

In West Virginia, Kara Kowalski sued school officials after she was suspended from her high school for five days in 2005 for creating a web page suggesting another student had a sexually transmitted disease. A federal appeals court upheld the suspension, dismissing Kowalski’s argument that the school shouldn’t punish her because she created the site at home.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear either case.

Jason Medley, of Houston, filed a defamation lawsuit in June against three of his daughter’s classmates. The classmates were accused of filming themselves making false sexual remarks about his daughter and posting the video to Facebook.

The complaint was settled months later with apologies from the girls and a small donation to charity, Medley’s attorney Robert Naudin said.

“The girls involved likely now understand the wrongful nature of what they did and the harm that can come of such conduct,” he said. “They made a donation out of their allowances to a charitable organization that fights against cyberbullying.”

In Georgia, lawmakers have given school administrators new powers to punish students if they bully others at school, but legislation that would expand the laws to include text messages and social media sites never reached a vote this year.

Seven states have added off-campus harassment to their bullying laws in recent years, though Georgia is not one of them.

“Cyberbullying really goes beyond the four walls of the school or the four corners of the campus, because if you use a cellphone, PDA or social media site, then those activities follow the child both into the school and out of the school,” said House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, a Democrat from Atlanta who co-sponsored the legislation that would have expanded Georgia’s bullying law. “It’s important for the state to really get ahead of this. It’s already happening, but it’s going to be more exacerbated and more difficult the longer we go.”

Alex and her family have started a petition to encourage lawmakers to strengthen Georgia’s law. Her lawsuit seeks a jury trial and unspecified damages.

“At first blush, you wouldn’t think it’s a big deal,” said Alex’s attorney, Natalie Woodward. “Once you actually see the stuff that’s on there, it’s shocking.”
 
I love when I get to agree with you PapaG
 
I sure hope the parents took screenshots of the facebook page.
Theres several states that are now taking Bullying seriously. Its hard to get the evidence, but secretly videotaping a conversation on speaker phone would be a good start, to get the bullies in trouble.

http://www.bullypolice.org/or_law.html
 
I love when I get to agree with you PapaG

Haha!

Yeah, I'm normally against suing, but I think this is the only recourse under the laws, and I applaud the young lady for taking this stand. It's not like the old days, when you could go to the parents' house and try to reason with them. Do that now, and you're more apt to get a restraining order against you, and a harassment charge, then you are to get a resolution to obvious vile behavior. Hell, in some of these instances, the moms even help the bullies smear their victims.
 
I sure hope the parents took screenshots of the facebook page.
Theres several states that are now taking Bullying seriously. Its hard to get the evidence, but secretly videotaping a conversation on speaker phone would be a good start, to get the bullies in trouble.

http://www.bullypolice.org/or_law.html

This isn't just a case of knocking somebody's books off their desk, either. Two girls took the time to set up a fake FB profile, lured this girl's friends into accepting her as a friend, and then basically tried to ruin her life. It's disgusting behavior, and as a parent, I'd sue, too.

I'm not sure what damages you could prove, but the psyche of a 14 year-old is worth something, isn't it?
 
Haha!

Yeah, I'm normally against suing, but I think this is the only recourse under the laws, and I applaud the young lady for taking this stand. It's not like the old days, when you could go to the parents' house and try to reason with them. Do that now, and you're more apt to get a restraining order against you, and a harassment charge, then you are to get a resolution to obvious vile behavior. Hell, in some of these instances, the moms even help the bullies smear their victims.

Just curious, what is your take on this story? Consider the society is quick to sue for any kind of contact.
 
Just curious, what is your take on this story? Consider the society is quick to sue for any kind of contact.

I think the principal is a gigantic pussy who should be publicly shamed for calling the cops on a 6 year-old. I also think that the parents of the boy need to get their child some help.

When I was in elementary school, I got the paddle once in 4th grade from the principal. Didn't really hurt anything other than my pride, but I learned my lesson. With that, and if the principal had no other recourse, you have to involve the police. Had he touched the kid, he'd probably lose his career. We have a new generation of weaklings, sad to say.
 
Last edited:
I think that kids need to toughen up a little bit. Using court resources to settle online squabbles between 14 year-olds seems like a pretty big misallocation of society's resources.

With that being said, I think that Facebook has a responsibility to put some process in place where fake accounts are taken down. Facebook is all about being transparent--using real names, only having one account, etc.--and that approach should allow a review and removal process of fake Facebook accounts when someone complains. They presumably remove spammers, right?

Ed O.
 
Facebook is all about being transparent--using real names, only having one account, etc.--

Ed O.

im pretty sure you can put whatever the fuck name you want in
 
What's concerning to me is that some parents either don't know what their kids are doing on the internet, or don't care. Either way, this is a scary trend in America. I wish these issues could be resolved without involving the police or lawyers. There was bullying when I was growing up, but the internet didn't come into play until I was in high school and then there wasn't a facebook or a twitter. It takes bullying to a whole new level, but I think the methods to resolve the problem should stay the same. Get the kids in a room and talk about it. Or take them out on the playground and kick their ass :grin:
 
I think that kids need to toughen up a little bit. Using court resources to settle online squabbles between 14 year-olds seems like a pretty big misallocation of society's resources.

With that being said, I think that Facebook has a responsibility to put some process in place where fake accounts are taken down. Facebook is all about being transparent--using real names, only having one account, etc.--and that approach should allow a review and removal process of fake Facebook accounts when someone complains. They presumably remove spammers, right?

Ed O.

This isn't an "online squabble". One could argue that it's identity theft, I suppose. Or would you be OK if I set up a Facebook account of you, made you out to be a racist, posted vile comments about your work contacts and social circle, and lured your friends and acquaintances into thinking that it was a real account? Then, when you complain to Facebook, they ignore you and allow the libel to continue. I'd be pissed if that happened to me, and more pissed if it happened to one of my daughters.
 
Last edited:
What's concerning to me is that some parents either don't know what their kids are doing on the internet, or don't care. Either way, this is a scary trend in America. I wish these issues could be resolved without involving the police or lawyers. There was bullying when I was growing up, but the internet didn't come into play until I was in high school and then there wasn't a facebook or a twitter. It takes bullying to a whole new level, but I think the methods to resolve the problem should stay the same. Get the kids in a room and talk about it. Or take them out on the playground and kick their ass :grin:

We have Norton Security minder set up for our PCs, and can see any website our girls visit, any instant messaging, and all incoming messages as well, along with IP traces from those messages. You can log in from anywhere, too. It's frigging free, and why any parent wouldn't use it baffles me. Hell, our girls are only 7 and 8 years old, too.
 
We have Norton Security minder set up for our PCs, and can see any website our girls visit, any instant messaging, and all incoming messages as well, along with IP traces from those messages. You can log in from anywhere, too. It's frigging free, and why any parent wouldn't use it baffles me. Hell, our girls are only 7 and 8 years old, too.

Just hope your kids never get interested in IT/hacking and out maneuver you. ;]
 
Haha!

Yeah, I'm normally against suing, but I think this is the only recourse under the laws, and I applaud the young lady for taking this stand. It's not like the old days, when you could go to the parents' house and try to reason with them. Do that now, and you're more apt to get a restraining order against you, and a harassment charge, then you are to get a resolution to obvious vile behavior. Hell, in some of these instances, the moms even help the bullies smear their victims.

I agree.
 
This isn't an "online squabble". One could argue that it's identity theft, I suppose. Or would you be OK if I set up a Facebook account of you, made you out to be a racist, posted vile comments about your work contacts and social circle, and lured your friends and acquaintances into thinking that it was a real account? Then, when you complain to Facebook, they ignore you and allow the libel to continue. I'd be pissed if that happened to me, and more pissed if it happened to one of my daughters.

It is an online squabble between 14 year-olds. There is no money being made or lost concerning capable parties (as there is in your hypothetical).

14 year-olds are not fully formed emotionally or physically. They are not able to enter into legally binding contracts because of this, and while they might be more sensitive to the damage that online bullying can do, they are also less capable of not participating in it. Exactly what a child's culpability in tort law is can be unclear.

Treating this as an issue for the courts is expensive and, in my opinion, a waste of resources.

Ed O.
 
I think what they are doing is appropriate. She is clearly the target of libelous behavior and this is the only way to stop.
 
We have Norton Security minder set up for our PCs, and can see any website our girls visit, any instant messaging, and all incoming messages as well, along with IP traces from those messages. You can log in from anywhere, too. It's frigging free, and why any parent wouldn't use it baffles me. Hell, our girls are only 7 and 8 years old, too.

It's too bad most parents don't do that.
 
Do we know if she owned a pair of Daisy Dukes? Because if she did, she had crabs and deserved to be bullied...

Lets let all the facts come out first, before we rush to any judgement.
 
It is an online squabble between 14 year-olds. There is no money being made or lost concerning capable parties (as there is in your hypothetical).

14 year-olds are not fully formed emotionally or physically. They are not able to enter into legally binding contracts because of this, and while they might be more sensitive to the damage that online bullying can do, they are also less capable of not participating in it. Exactly what a child's culpability in tort law is can be unclear.

Treating this as an issue for the courts is expensive and, in my opinion, a waste of resources.

Ed O.

A couple of non attorney thoughts...

First, this is extremely hurtful. Kids kill themselves over this type of stuff. To say this is a waste of the court's resources is wrong. To me, this is one of the very reasons we have courts.

Second, a minor may or may not be liable for their actions, but their parents are (if the minor isn't) in a tort sense. Be it poor parenting or just a stinker of a kid they have a duty to intervene aggressively in something like this. If they won't, then this seems like an appropriate wake up call.
 
It is an online squabble between 14 year-olds. There is no money being made or lost concerning capable parties (as there is in your hypothetical).

14 year-olds are not fully formed emotionally or physically. They are not able to enter into legally binding contracts because of this, and while they might be more sensitive to the damage that online bullying can do, they are also less capable of not participating in it. Exactly what a child's culpability in tort law is can be unclear.

Treating this as an issue for the courts is expensive and, in my opinion, a waste of resources.

Ed O.

Nonsense.

This girl's reputation has been marred for life. 10 years from now when she applies for a job her college degree will be meaningless when the HR department does an internet search and finds the racist video her fake profile put on facebook, along with reference to her using drugs. It will be there forever. She should sue for at least $1 million.
 
If the cops can't do anything, and if Facebook won't take down the fake profile, I'd probably sue as well, just to make a point. I'd add Facebook as a defendant, too, since obviously they knew it was wrong, considering they took down the phony page when the lawsuit was filed.

If courts allow schools to suspend students for bullying, which is performed off-campus after school hours, then to be consistent, the rules the courts invent will soon be applied to adults.

Employers will be allowed to punish employees for behavior outside of work hours. The next step will be message boards. Denny will be allowed to punish PapaG for running a signature for 4 months which quotes jlprk as saying that Aldridge isn't the best player on his team. This will predicate the collapse of America and make China's world takeover even easier.
 
If courts allow schools to suspend students for bullying, which is performed off-campus after school hours, then to be consistent, the rules the courts invent will soon be applied to adults.

Employers will be allowed to punish employees for behavior outside of work hours. The next step will be message boards. Denny will be allowed to punish PapaG for running a signature for 4 months which quotes jlprk as saying that Aldridge isn't the best player on his team. This will predicate the collapse of America and make China's world takeover even easier.

Not to tell you the sky is falling, but employers can punish employees for certain types of off employment issues.
 
If courts allow schools to suspend students for bullying, which is performed off-campus after school hours, then to be consistent, the rules the courts invent will soon be applied to adults.

Employers will be allowed to punish employees for behavior outside of work hours. The next step will be message boards. Denny will be allowed to punish PapaG for running a signature for 4 months which quotes jlprk as saying that Aldridge isn't the best player on his team. This will predicate the collapse of America and make China's world takeover even easier.

The thought police are coming.
 
I think that kids need to toughen up a little bit. Using court resources to settle online squabbles between 14 year-olds seems like a pretty big misallocation of society's resources.

With that being said, I think that Facebook has a responsibility to put some process in place where fake accounts are taken down. Facebook is all about being transparent--using real names, only having one account, etc.--and that approach should allow a review and removal process of fake Facebook accounts when someone complains. They presumably remove spammers, right?

Ed O.

I mostly agree with you, except intellectual property is something very difficult for anyone to "own". Facebook shouldn't have to do anything (then again, their patents and copy rights are also suspect).

Also the litigants are being complete pussies, it is called freedom of speech for a reason, it means you don't get to control my brain or thoughts or words. The litigants are a bunch of babies in my opinion. In the rough school I went to, you walk this stuff off or toughen up.

It is an online squabble between 14 year-olds. There is no money being made or lost concerning capable parties (as there is in your hypothetical).

14 year-olds are not fully formed emotionally or physically. They are not able to enter into legally binding contracts because of this, and while they might be more sensitive to the damage that online bullying can do, they are also less capable of not participating in it. Exactly what a child's culpability in tort law is can be unclear.

Treating this as an issue for the courts is expensive and, in my opinion, a waste of resources.

Ed O.

Identity theft is not just making a fake profile. Usually Identity theft is using someone's physical money or capital.

But simply making a fake profile is not sufficient. Ruining an intangible form of property, that was never "yours" to begin with, is completely different.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense.

This girl's reputation has been marred for life. 10 years from now when she applies for a job her college degree will be meaningless when the HR department does an internet search and finds the racist video her fake profile put on facebook, along with reference to her using drugs. It will be there forever. She should sue for at least $1 million.

It is not her reputation, it is a collection of thoughts that occur in my brain actually.

Also the people making the false webpage and facebook, are the ones that are losing credibility. The government has no right to regulate thought.

A couple of non attorney thoughts...

First, this is extremely hurtful. Kids kill themselves over this type of stuff. To say this is a waste of the court's resources is wrong. To me, this is one of the very reasons we have courts.

Second, a minor may or may not be liable for their actions, but their parents are (if the minor isn't) in a tort sense. Be it poor parenting or just a stinker of a kid they have a duty to intervene aggressively in something like this. If they won't, then this seems like an appropriate wake up call.

What matters is the Constitution. In Australia or Europe you would have a great case though, but you are not entitled to anyone's respect here.

I still respect you for the record, voluntarily. :]
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top