The Nets are trying to get WAY under the cap by 2010 so they don't have to do a sign-and-trade. That's one of the reasons they traded Jefferson.
Ok, I'd thought that I had heard that we would have to do a sign and trade, although that could have been before the RJ trade. With Devin, Yi, Boone, SWat, Brook, Anderson, CDR, Najera, Dooling and our future picks, we would still have to move Vince before being able to offer a max contract, though, right?
Why in God's--or Rod's--name would the Nets invest more than $45 million over five years, including this one, in a guy who plays the same position as the guy they want to sign in two years. Again, it makes NO sense...NONE.
Well, I thought the reason we could get LeBron was because of Jay-Z and Brooklyn. With Brooklyn looking like it will be delayed past when he's a free agent, it seems like there would be a much smaller possibility for signing him.
And if you dont want Lebron or he stays in Cleveland, there are other players in that free agent class.
Wade and big men are the other options, none play SF. Bosh and Amare seem unlikely unless we give up on Brook or Yi by then, so it seems like it would be Wade. We'd probably move Vince if we got Wade, so that would give us more cap space than not having Wallace would.
Gerald Wallace is not Marion, not Smith, not AK-47. He is not a combo forward.
He is similar to them. A plus defender who can guard either forward spot, and he may not play inside much, but neither do the other guys. He can't really play PF full time like the others, but he is more effective there than most SFs.