Going into this season Cho and the front office must of knew we were gonna be bad

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MIXUM

Suspended
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
5,983
Likes
44
Points
0
How could they enter a season with this bench and then trade bayless???? To me thats a white flag being sent up early in year. They must have known how bad this bench was gonna be. I mean, you look at almost every team in this league and they are likely better then our bench. And dont say they were counting on oden... he doesnt play PG, SG or SF. All those spots off the bench are dreadful. Does anyone remember the last time Rudy scored something other then a three or layup? HES FUCKING HORRIBLE. All he does is run around and take a bad shot in air. This team needs a Jason Richardson type off the bench in THE WORST WAY. What a pleasure it was watching Hill and Neal move around WITH SPEED and make and take great shots. Watching them compared to Rudy is like watching a B-horror movie from the 80s (Rudy) to Avatar(neal and hill).

Im just starting to wonder if Cho and company knew we were dead this season and thats why they didnt improve the bench instead going with d league type talent instead. mills and aarmon johnson do not belong in the nba. I cant take our bench anymore. Its like if the starters suck... we are done. Thanks cho... cause theres no way anyone is gonna tell me that they didnt see this coming. For everyone who strokes KP... LOOK AT OUR DRAFTS AS OF LATE. H O R R I B L E!
 
Why do you keep creating new threads to say the same shit?
 
quite frankly its puzzling. the blazers all summer and al through pre season said the goal was 2nd round of playoffs. then they give us this GARBAGE BENCH. So im having a hard time putting the 2 together. Doesnt make sense. Am i wrong here?

Heres a challenge to the entire board.... give me 5 benches in the NBA worse then the Blazers.....
 
and of course all the shit talkers have no answer....
 
Gee Mixum I forgot what a huge Bayless fan you were...............wait you hated him too.
 
How could they enter a season with this bench and then trade bayless???? To me thats a white flag being sent up early in year.

nic is outlaw, webster, rudy, bayless , sergio part 6

He'll say anything, including contradictory things, to push buttons. Recognize his game and tune him out, if he bugs you.
 
im not a huge bayless fan but um....

hes night and day better then mills and johnson
 
Cho & Co. are still evaluating this roster. No need to rush.

[/MB]
 
what the hell do they need to evaluate????? the bench is pretty clear to see even to casual fans

PG - garbage

SG - euro garbage

SF - sell stock now

PF - big east garbage

C - only guy i would keep
 
and yet nobody will take my challenge... which says we have worst bench in nba
 
what the hell do they need to evaluate????? the bench is pretty clear to see even to casual fans

PG - garbage
SG - euro garbage
SF - sell stock now
PF - big east garbage
C - only guy i would keep

Deep, yet concise. You could start a scouting service and sell this advice.

Our bench now includes Przybilla. We're thin at forward because we gave away Juwan Howard, and at PG because we gave away Sergio.
 
"...must have known..."

:)
 
im not a huge bayless fan but um....

hes night and day better then mills and johnson

So Now Bayless is a difference maker, and before according to you, we needed to get rid of him?

Is he better than those two right now. Yes. Was his style of play as a PG going to solve our bench problems? To the extent that we were (as you put) giving up? According to you Bayless was crap. You can't have it both ways.
 
So your theory is that Cho knew we were going to be bad, so he decided to make us worse?
 
wasnt your last identical thread on this called "Beating a dead horse.... BUT"

so what's this then?
 
wasnt your last identical thread on this called "Beating a dead horse.... BUT"

so what's this then?
 
wasnt your last identical thread on this called "Beating a dead horse.... BUT"

so what's this then?

"Further beating a dead horse....BUT (if the horse doesn't complain, it must enjoy it)"
 
"Further beating a dead horse....BUT (if the horse doesn't complain, it must enjoy it)"

The horse was asking for it, dressed the way it was.

barfo
 
"Beating the dead horse, again. BUT this time it has a different thread title... Same ole story though."
 
Did anybody see what happened to the horse on The Walking Dead?

Episode-1-Horse-Walkers-760.jpg


Now that's a dead horse.
 
Did anybody see what happened to the horse on The Walking Dead?

Episode-1-Horse-Walkers-760.jpg


Now that's a dead horse.

Well, I feel embarrassed. This whole time, I thought the saying was BEATING a dead horse, not EATING. I stand corrected.
 
Well, I feel embarrassed. This whole time, I thought the saying was BEATING a dead horse, not EATING. I stand corrected.

Don't look a dead horse in the mouth.
 
A dead horse in one hand is worth two in the bush.

Would you please get off of your dead horse?
 
Your previous evaluations of Bayless was that he "sucked". Your words.

How schmuckish is it to now say the bench sucks because the team traded a guy that sucked?

Go Blazers
 
well he doesnt suck as much as johnson and mills... therefore hes better.

its like would i trade rudy fernandez for delonte west???? no but i would trade rudy fernandez for wilson chandler? yes
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top