GOP aligns with the ACLU

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Sug

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,991
Likes
55
Points
48
Wow...GOP is the new left. They are even using the Liberal media to get their message out, I mean the Huffington Post?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/10/michael-steele-harry-reid_n_417661.html

Michael Steele called on Sunday for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to step down for racially insensitive comments, even as the RNC Chairman brushed aside talk that he should resign for using an epithet of his own.

Appearing on "Fox News Sunday", Steele condemned Reid for calling then-presidential candidate Barack Obama "light-skinned" and "with no Negro dialect" in private conversations during the campaign. The remarks, Steele stressed, were just as contemptuous as those made by former Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), who once praised Strom Thurmond's segregationist presidential candidacy. And, as such, Reid (like Lott) should be forced to resign from his leadership post.

"I think he should," said Steele. "There is a standard where Democrats think they can say these things and apologize when it comes from the mouth of their own. But if it comes from anyone else, it's racism. It's either racist or it's not. And it's inappropriate, absolutely. So if the standard is the one we saw with Trent Lott as leader at the time, then I think this absolutely falls in that category here. ... Remember, this is the same leader who just a few weeks ago was talking about health care in the context of slavery. Clearly he is out of touch."

The follow-up question to Steele's statement was obvious from the onset. The RNC Chairman, this past week, had been chastised by members of both parties for using the phrase "Honest Injun" to tout the Republican party's platform. Combined with other gaffes, was this too grounds for resignation?

"No, absolutely not," he said. "Why should I Chris [Wallace]? I'm pushing the ball. I'm raising the money. I'm winning elections. I have got the base fired up."

"If [the comment] is [offensive] I apologize for it," he added. "I wasn't intending to say a racial slur at all. The reality is that's not the same as what we were talking about before."

Steele, of course, has had more flare-ups this past week then just the "Honest Injun" remark. And Wallace pressed him to address several others, including news that he was doing a book tour with the knowledge of his own staff and predictions that the GOP wasn't ready to win or govern the House of Representatives.

"There is too much focus on me because that's what Washington wants to focus on," Steele confessed. "I'm very passionate about what I do. I'm very passionate about winning. ... So I bring that to the table. And yeah, I get a little bit hot headed."
 
the irony is rich, on both sides.
 
http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-02-republican-party-itself-has-drive-out-trent-lott

Obama in '02: 'The Republican Party itself has to drive out Trent Lott'

5:28 PM, Jan 9, 2010 · BY JOHN MCCORMACK

In light of President Obama's decision to forgive Harry Reid's remarks about Obama's skin color and lack of a "Negro dialect," check out what Obama said about Trent Lott in 2002:

Illinois Senator Barack Obama (D-13th), who hosted WVON's Cliff Kelley Show, challenged the Republican Party to repudiate Lott's remarks and to call for his resignation as senate leader.

"It seems to be that we can forgive a 100-year-old senator for some of the indiscretion of his youth, but, what is more difficult to forgive is the current president of the U.S. Senate (Lott) suggesting we had been better off if we had followed a segregationist path in this country after all of the battles and fights for civil rights and all the work that we still have to do," said Obama.

He said: "The Republican Party itself has to drive out Trent Lott. If they have to stand for something, they have to stand up and say this is not the person we want representing our party."

--From the December 12, 2002 issue of the Chicago Defender.
 
If Michael Steele would have said something like, "Ben Nighthorse-Campbell is one honest injun" I could see the dismay from the left.
 
"It seems to be that we can forgive a 100-year-old senator for some of the indiscretion of his youth, but, what is more difficult to forgive is the current president of the U.S. Senate (Lott) suggesting we had been better off if we had followed a segregationist path in this country after all of the battles and fights for civil rights and all the work that we still have to do," said Obama.

I think that is a bit different than saying "Negro dialect".
 
I think that is a bit different than saying "Negro dialect".

You do know that's State Senator Obama's interpretation of what Trent Lott said, and not what he actually said, right? Lott awkwardly tried to compliment Sen. Thurmond on his birthday. The Democrats took what he said in the worst possible way and played politics with it. Do you really believe Sen. Lott meant we'd be better as a segregated society, or that he believed that states should have more rights than they do currently? Read what the Washington Post (hardly a conservative apologist paper) had to say in this news story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A37288-2002Dec10?language=printer

In my mind, State Senator Obama's quote says more about Obama than Lott.
 
BTW, I don't think Harry Reid should step down because of his opinion. Our current Vice President said much the same thing when he called Sen. Obama "bright, articulate and clean". They were both speaking the truth that America was only going to elect a black president who spoke without a trace of Ebonics.

I hate political correctness. It's nothing more than passive thought control.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top