GhostOfPGA
The late great Paul Allen
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2018
- Messages
- 3,222
- Likes
- 3,440
- Points
- 113
Thoughts?
I come from a logging family, this is not a good bill.
I come from a logging family, this is not a good bill.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s gonna put a lot of mills/families/workers out of business, up the Canyon and near the coast.23 cents more a gallon of gas to cap emmisions. I can see how it would be bad for logging families. They would have to pay for going over the cap. Then those costs will get sent down the line to the customers. It's tough.
It’s gonna put a lot of mills/families/workers out of business, up the Canyon and near the coast.
Another big problem is big businesses will use this bill to pollute all they want and use our forests as “carbon offsets”. That’s why so many big businesses are in favor of it.Yeah. Smaller family businesses. Larger companies can survive it. I think a better way to handle this rather than strong hold businesses like your families is to provide more incentives for using less emissions. Then companies will work towards cutting down rather than being forced out of business.
Another big problem is big businesses will use this bill to pollute all they want and use our forests as “carbon offsets”. That’s why so many big businesses are in favor of it.
Sadly it’s not going to a vote, Kate Brown and her super majority are trying to force this down all our throats.Exactly, because to them it's a small bill to pay. It is riduculous. They won't have my vote.
Sadly it’s not going to a vote, Kate Brown and her super majority are trying to force this down all our throats.
This is just another way that the elite political class couldn’t care less about the average person or small business.Hey Ghost how would emissions in smaller businesses compare to those in larger businessess? Smaller businesses still wouldn't be able to pay the bill on that because even though your guys emissions are far less than larger companies it is still more than you can afford right? That is messed up.
That should be taken in account in such bills. They are trying to make you guys pay the same as the large companies. That isn't right.
Thoughts?
I come from a logging family, this is not a good bill.
They are trying to make you guys pay the same as the large companies. That isn't right.
Could one of you outline what you see as the negative aspects of this bill and the impact it will have?
It appears to me at first glance (and I've only spent a couple minutes reading about it so far, so I'm not claiming knowledge) that it has two major components:
1) a gas tax increase (with rebates for ag, timber, and poor people)
2) carbon tax on large industries (about 100 companies).
I get that nobody wants to pay more for gas, and obviously people who live in rural areas tend to drive longer distances. I get that a business on the edge of failing can be pushed over the edge by an additional tax (or any other new negative event).
Is there more to it than that?
barfo
Is there more to it than that?

I think it's a good bill.Thoughts?
I come from a logging family, this is not a good bill.
Yeah. Smaller family businesses. Larger companies can survive it. I think a better way to handle this rather than strong hold businesses like your families is to provide more incentives for using less emissions. Then companies will work towards cutting down rather than being forced out of business.
EAT YOUR KALE SON!
So in a way this has been done. Its tax rebates. But then the public goes crazy when they find out large companies don't pay any taxes (but its because of the credits and rebates we made available)
EAT YOUR KALE SON!
