Hollinger's 2008-09 All-Breakout: Does not mention Blazers once; East beats West?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

mook

The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
8,309
Likes
3,944
Points
113
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=All-Breakout-Team-081020

Maybe Hollinger figures that rookies (Oden, Fernandez, Bayless, Batum) can't technically have breakouts. But it seems weird to me that he doesn't mention Aldridge.

The most interesting part of his article from a Blazers' perspective is his view of the weakening of the West:

The East: I am ready to state boldly that the East, after a long, dark decade in the wilderness, no longer will be the NBA's doormat. In fact, I am projecting that Eastern teams will win six games more than Western teams this season, which would be a huge turnaround from a 2007-08 season that saw eight Western teams win at least 50 games.
Why such a big shift? Let us count the ways:
Stars shifting. Elton Brand went from west to east, making one potentially decent team subpar out West and making one average Eastern team suddenly look very, very good. Meanwhile, Miami essentially adds a superstar in Dwyane Wade because he's fully healed, and the Heat should improve from league doormat to something in the general vicinity of average.
Trades. At the deadline last season, the West traded Shawn Marion and Devin Harris for Shaq and Jason Kidd. Great deal in 2000; not so much in 2008. Several lesser players went east, too, in salary dumps (Mike Bibby, Wally Szczerbiak, Delonte West) without any comparable talents going east to west.
Injuries. Manu Ginobili and Monta Ellis both will miss big chunks of the season, hurting the West. In the East, Gilbert Arenas is likely to do the same, but because he didn't play last year either, it doesn't knock the East down any from where it was.
Coaches. You can make a fairly convincing argument that the three least-effective coaches were in the East last season -- Larry Krystkowiak, Isiah Thomas and Sam Vincent. Not only were all three sent packing, but each was replaced by a coach with an established track record. Scott Skiles, Mike D'Antoni and Larry Brown will help teams in Milwaukee, New York and Charlotte get off the mat.
Age. The Western powers are getting up in years and starting to show their cracks, particularly the trinity of Phoenix, San Antonio and Dallas. The three of them could end up dropping 25 wins from the West's total.
Extremes. At the very top and very bottom, the East rules. Boston, obviously, is the reigning champ, and Detroit had the league's second-best record last season. Meanwhile, I'm projecting every Eastern team to win at least 27 games; rebuilding Western teams in Memphis, Oklahoma City and Sacramento all figure to do worse.
All told, the difference probably won't completely evaporate at the playoff-qualifying level -- I'm projecting Denver to miss the playoffs with 41 wins while Charlotte will make it with 40. But on a conference versus conference basis, I expect things to be pretty close to a draw, and for the first time in eons, it might even tilt to the East's advantage.

He's got an interesting point about the decline of the West. I definitely don't think we're going to have to win 50 games to get into the playoffs this year.
 
Wow I came away from that article wondering why he is writing articles being a "basketball expert". The "Stealth all star canidates" part of it was worth a good laugh, at best.
 
I'll just put it out there now that I have had issues with Hollinger's system, ratings, and predictions for about 2 years now. This way, when I bash him at length during the season (starting now, I guess), you'll know it's been festering for a while, not some johnny-bash-lately gig b/c the electricity in Mom's basement shorted out my Simulated 2K9 season.
 
how can he degrade the West for having top teams getting on in age and then turn around and praise the East for having Boston and Detroit???

I know ESPN and the league are desperate for the East not to be the overall embarassment it's been, but about the only thing truly of note is Brand going to Phili. Here's guessing Portland adding Greg and Rudy more then offsets that.

STOMP
 
A lot of the reasons that teams from the West were so good, was that the teams in the east, were so bad. The reason that Boston and Detroit got better records was because they play more games against the bad teams than the teams from the west do.

If I was looking at anything as an indicator, I would be looking at the IR report. Monta Ellis out for months. Baron Davis out for months. Shane Battier out for months. Tracy McGrady possibly not ready for the season.

I do agree with him that they got some better coaches over there, but I don't see any of them having much to work with in the first season.
 
I can't say I have any big argument with his approach. When I think of "breakout" players, I think of guys already in the league - not rookies.

As for LMA, he "broke out" last season. He may continue to improve, but not at the rate he did between his rookie year and last season. His great leap forward already happened, and was pretty impressive.
 
i'd still take each of the top 8 teams in the west(lakers, rockets, hornets, blazers, spurs, jazz, suns, mavs) over all but the top 3 teams in the east(celtics, cavs, pistons). so if 8 of the top 11 teams are in the west(and i know not everyone will agree with me there), i'd have to say the west is significantly better than the east.
 
If I was looking at anything as an indicator, I would be looking at the IR report. Monta Ellis out for months. Baron Davis out for months. Shane Battier out for months. Tracy McGrady possibly not ready for the season.
battier isn't out for months. he may even be back to start the season.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top