<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Balla 15 @ Mar 3 2008, 08:07 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Mar 3 2008, 07:57 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>i'd be happy with #10 and #22. there are a lot of options with that sort of combo.</div>
Guard or big?
</div>
Oh, I meant that you could get good value whether you drafted someone in each spot; tried to combine the picks and move up; or combine either pick with a player to move up. I think there are a lot of options for a GM. If they keep the picks, I think they could get a very good player at #10 that fits the Nets' profile, especially since the trend of most other teams is to take a freshman and/or a big man, so I think that who ever the Nets like will have a good chance of falling to them. If I had to guess, I'd say that the Nets will take a soph or junior swingman who is tall for his position, runs like a deer and plays some serious on-ball defense, is a complimentary part--not the primary scorer--on his college team which happens to be a major program in a major conference. They'd love for him to be a dead-eye shooter, but if they had to sacrifice something, that would probably be it.
They hit gold with that profile with Richard Jefferson; failed with Antoine Wright.
I don't know who it is. Chris Douglas-Roberts? Russell Westbrook? I haven't seen them play; just basing it on the profiles. I could see OJ Mayo also, who could fall due to questions a la Marcus and Sean and Josh.