How on earth did Minnesota win by 26 IN Detroit?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
KingSpeed

KingSpeed

Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
63,323
Likes
22,503
Points
113
That should be a wake up call to our team that any team can kick your ass if you don't bring it.
 
Last edited:
Re: How on earth did Minnesota win by 26 IN Detroit.

The Allen Iverson effect of course
 
Re: How on earth did Minnesota win by 26 IN Detroit.

KingSpeed said:
But they beat the Lakers.
Click to expand...

exactly, he's sporadic.

And the more his teammates play with him, the more they will hate him and it will ruin chemistry.
 
Re: How on earth did Minnesota win by 26 IN Detroit.

KingSpeed said:
But they beat the Lakers.
Click to expand...

Just wait until the wolves play the Lakers. It will be like the Rose Garden Massacre of the bulls...
 
Re: How on earth did Minnesota win by 26 IN Detroit.

andalusian said:
Just wait until the wolves play the Lakers. It will be like the Rose Garden Massacre of the bulls...
Click to expand...

Who wins?????
 
It's NBA basketball. It was just like a depleted Sac Team winning in New Orleans last week. These upsets happen all the time in the NBA. Any player or team can get hot for a night. That is why it was ridiculous for Blazers fans to think the loss at Golden State was so inexcusable.
 
...my guess is that the entire Piston team was out late last night partying it up and building off-the-court chemistry with their new beloved teammate, AI :dunno:
 
I still think Minnesota is the "best" worst team in the NBA. On paper they look like a team that should be able to win a few or at least play people to the wire.

Without looking at the boxscore I'd wager Iverson took half of the team's shots and only converted on 35% while Rasheed decided he'd rather hang on the perimeter and jack up 6 or 7 threes.

Am I close?
 
3/11 outta 81 team attempt for AI

1/4 three attempts for Wallace
 
DaRizzle said:
3/11 outta 81 team attempt for AI

1/4 three attempts for Wallace
Click to expand...

I guess I was "sort of" close (can't believe AI only took 11 shots in a game!). Rasheed has turned into a novelty act at this point of his career. I've never seen a 7 footer so in love with the three-ball. :ohno:
 
Nikolokolus said:
Without looking at the boxscore I'd wager Iverson took half of the team's shots and only converted on 35% while Rasheed decided he'd rather hang on the perimeter and jack up 6 or 7 threes.

Am I close?
Click to expand...

I was curious so I looked.

Out of 81 shots, AI took 11 and made 3.

Rasheed shot four 3's and made one. He was 3-10 overall.

Minn shot 53% (63% from three) and Detroit shot 37% (36% from three). Ball game.

-Tim
 
Nikolokolus said:
I guess I was "sort of" close (can't believe AI only took 11 shots in a game!). Rasheed has turned into a novelty act at this point of his career. I've never seen a 7 footer so in love with the three-ball. :ohno:
Click to expand...

Yet besides for Dirk what 7 footer has ever been better from the 3...


but yeah...7 footers shooting 3's is lame
 
Dumars basically sacrificed this year and next years team for a chance at one of the Free Agents in 2010. So far Iverson hasn't won shit no matter where he goes. I realize he had some great years in Philly but every team he's gone to has struggled including the Olympic teams he was on. One of those great individual players that doesn't make players around him better.
 
dumars is a joke, but he basically made everyone believe that they were getting better, when all they did was screw with chemistry and take 10 million out of mcdyss's pockets. fuck him, they are all done. they have a shitload of cap space THIS offseason though, so they could compete on a couple free agents with us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top