How would we have done against Warriors if Nurkic had played?

[Strenuus]

and you always have to butt in where you weren't involved. It was a fucking joke so next time, just mind your own business ok.

*looks up about 3 posts*

*sees the irony*

*leaves the thread*

 

[Orion Bailey]

snapshots of the scoreboard 20-30 minutes into the game don't mean much at all. It's the NBA

the series was NOT "extremely competitive". If it had been the Blazers would have won 2 or 3 games. The Blazers didn't embarrass themselves by losing games by 30 points, but there are no moral victories in the playoffs. The series with Denver was extremely competitive; getting swept doesn't fit the template

Wrong. You can get swept and have a competitive series.

So take it the other way./ Lets say the blazers swept GSW with the following scores....

113-111
115-109
114-113 overtime
106-104



That end score is only a snapshot and yet the total difference in point scored is only 9 points. 9 point difference in 4 games is absolutely competitive.

 

[Reep]

Wrong. You can get swept and have a competitive series.

So take it the other way./ Lets say the blazers swept GSW with the following scores....

113-111
115-109
114-113 overtime
106-104



That end score is only a snapshot and yet the total difference in point scored is only 9 points. 9 point difference in 4 games is absolutely competitive.

You guys are seriously trying to convince the other that their definition of "competitive" is wrong? Good luck.