<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Mar 6 2008, 11:11 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Mar 6 2008, 10:58 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Mar 6 2008, 10:48 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Mar 6 2008, 10:41 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Devin Harris was the centerpiece of the Kidd trade and is signed to a long term contract. If you were running the Nets FO, how would you build a team around him?</div>
I'm starting to be won over by the argument that he should be used as the 2 guard. Interestingly, when the starting unit was in the game, it seemed like often Carter was running the point, and Harris moving without the ball.
</div>
A 2 guard that can't shoot consistently. What a brilliant concept.
</div>
We already know that you're intractable and unimaginative. There's no need to be nasty about it. </div>
Continue with personal shots, I'm sure it makes you feel better.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>But to continue, he shoots the ball as well as kittles did.</div>
What measure are you using to back this up?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Regardless, the issue was how to build a team around him. I believe that you can build a team around ANYONE. I'm suggesting building that team with Harris pencilled in as the starting SG and backup PG. Surely, if you can envision building a team around him as starting PG, you can envision bulding a team around him as a starting SG.</div>
That is as useful as suggesting building a team around LeBron James at PF. Yes it could be done, but it is pointless.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>However, if you have the urge to insult me again,</div>
I didn't insult you, rather I attacked your statement / opinion. You are the one choosing to make it personal.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>why don't you just cut to the chase and get to your agenda, since obviously this thread was meant to support your own, currently unstated opinion on the matter.</div>
This thread has no agenda. I've stated my position on Devin quite clearly: trade him while so many teams overvalue him so that Thorn can rip off another team for more assets to build for the future.