I like this ish right here

[Black Republican]

Any one up for a three way trade (if and only if Nenad doesn&rsquo;t help): DALLAS, INDIANA, NEW JERSEY- Dallas gets:J.Kidd, Collins, and Kareem Rush, or Andre Owens, Indiana gets: Josh Howard, Nick Fazekas, and Eddie Gill, New Jersey gets: Devin Harris, Jeramie Oneal, and Erick Dampier. Each team gets better. Indiana (playing better w/o JO) needs and all star shooting guard to play with Danny. Dallas gets automatic championship, because all they needed was a good pg. New Jersey gets a good young point, a good rebounder, and a good post player. Throw in a few picks to balance salaries, then New Jersey may have to give up Boone to Indiana, and everything else works.</p>

</p>

</p>

^^Got that from a poster(Jerrod) @ NetsDaily.com</p>

 

[Jizzy]

decent deal. still prefer Farmar and Cittenton along with Odom from LA tho;</p>

 

[kobimel]

Why would Dallas trade Howard, Harris, Fazekas AND Dampier for Kidd, Collins and Owens/Rush? That kid must be smoking something.</p>

Oh, and the Nets are ripping off the other teams in this trade too. Basically, they're dumping Collins' terrible contract (picking up Dampier's bad contract as well, but at least he's productive), dumping Gill without having to waive him and keep paying him (correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he's on a guaranteed contract? Even if he's not, then it's just like waiving him and that'll happen for sure once DA and Marcus are at 100%) and trading Kidd for Jermaine O'Neal (who I still believe can regain his all-star form, just like Carter did when he came here), a good point guard in Harris and Dampier, who again, is much much much more productive than Collins.</p>

 

[cpawfan]

Dallas wouldn't trade JHo for Kidd straight up</p>

 

[ghoti]

Why take back that crap if Howard is available?

 

[pegs]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti)</div><div class='quotemain'>Why take back that crap if Howard is available?</div></p>

</p>

Agreed. I'd much rather have Josh than JO.</p>