BigDaddyAl1973
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 7,057
- Likes
- 1,469
- Points
- 113
...no one said that...if you can actually quote someone to the contrary, I'll wait.
anyone choosing to start a team with Jeter over Jones is saying that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...no one said that...if you can actually quote someone to the contrary, I'll wait.
anyone choosing to start a team with Jeter over Jones is saying that
...so you can't actually quote someone, right?...pretty much what I thought...sorry, but you're wrong again. No one who has said that they would rather have Jeter than Chipper has said that...but make things up if you want.
...top shelf SSs are harder to come by than 3Bmen. And it's pretty much obvious to just about everyone that when you are "starting a team", you start by building "up the middle" (SS, 2B, CF, and C).
...and not one person, and certainly not me, has said that Chipper was not a fine player. In fact, he went to the same school I went to in my home town and I'm quite aware of his career. But Jeter dreamed of playing for the Yanx since he was 5-6 years old and that was part of the reasoning behind drafting him in the first place.
And for clarity sake, let's be real...of Jeter, ARod, Nomad and Tejada, only Jeter is going into the HOF. In my mind, that settles who was the best, and we didn't even have to count rings. And I gave my logic/formula as to why I would prefer to build my franchise around a talented SS. No disrespect to Chipper, but a quick look at the NL AS rosters during his career, there was some stiff competition at 3B. And yes, a few one year wonders, but that's the point, you can fill that hole in your lineup easier than a SS.
that's bullshit...
I have asked what other switch hitting 3rd basemen would you take over the same period of time...
During their primes, Arod was superior....Tejada and Nomar were just as good with Nomar being a better hitter...you want solid up the middle defense..then you take Omar Viquel.
put them both in a room, and everyone would know who jeter was!
WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING you made it sound like AROD AND NOMAR were from a different decade......you simply cannot stay on topic without bringing up even more irrelevancies...we're talking about building a team in 1995, right?
...surprised you didn't pull Ozzie Smith or Bill Mazeroski out of your ass.
OK great, in 1995 you want Omar Vizquel. Then I'll take Matt Williams at 3B. Have you noticed not too many people are putting as much value on switch hitting ? No one is saying he wasn't rare if you want to parse things down to that level. But generally speaking a good power hitting 3B isn't that hard to come by compared to a well rounded SS. What part of building a franchise down the middle of the field do you now agree with? Thus far you are saying that you don't need a SS if you have a switching hitting 3B with power and average. Got any examples where that philosophy has worked?
WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING you made it sound like AROD AND NOMAR were from a different decade...
Nomar drafted 1st round 12th overall in 1994
Arod drafted 1st overall in 1993
Vizquel was already established in the league by 1995 with his 3rd of 5 in a row gold gloves.
Those three at the time when this debate is started are three SS that were just as good if not better than Jeter.
...the topic is between Jeter and Jones in "1995", is it not?... You're the one who decided to interject the irrelevant others.
yeah no owner starting up a team would want these two kids...or a defensive stud like Vizquel.
Vizquel?...well, at least you FINALLY decided to actually compare SSs instead of comparing SSa to 3Bmen...now, care to also compare Vizquel's OFFENSIVE value to Jeter's?...didn't think so.
Out of the three no owner would start a team with Vizquel.
Now...what switch hitting 3rd basement were around that were better than Jones.
...for the 3rd time, that was Tote's comment, not mine...you'll have to take it up with him...and try to keep up
id take Chipper and the switch hitting feature and the additional power...also not that it should play a big affect but Jeter had a 22 million dollar payroll hit while Chipper topped out at 16 million giving me payroll flexiability to get others
big d!!!!!!!!!! c'mon man!! take the money and the switch hitting out of the equation, as a matter of fact, take it all out!! let me quote the great Fred G Sanford, R U CRAZY!!!!!!!! jeter is more then money, power in the sense of Hr's, and switch hitting.... the intangibles, no one matches jeter!
Those intangibles only means something when you have other good players around him.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Those intangibles only means something when you have other good players around him.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Those intangibles only means something when you have other good players around him.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Al, I couldn't disagree more, if you are starting a team, you need a leader, both on and off the field. It's not that Chipper lacked talent or leadership, to me, Jeter was and still is the better choice given the topic. This is not blind Yankee pride talking. Jeter was the gold standard back in 95.