illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,817
- Likes
- 56,341
- Points
- 113
Was just wondering. I wonder if we'll let him walk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was just wondering. I wonder if we'll let him walk.
Ya I too thought he was only signing 1 year deals, meaning this should be the last year he's on his current contract. JVG is still available.
We missed out of RA, though.
JVG would be a good hire. He's also funny as hell on tv
I thought before the playoffs last season he signed a 2 year extension. I'm not certain but I remember hearing the Lakers were pissed as they wanted him to replace Phil and Kobe is a big Nate fan.
Nope, he's year to year right now.
That type of determination, and that kind of dedication, has come to define McMillan during his six seasons in Portland.
And those two prominent traits are the main reasons the Blazers on Tuesday signed him to two-year extension, keeping McMillan under contract in Portland through the 2012-2013 season

I thought before the playoffs last season he signed a 2 year extension. I'm not certain but I remember hearing the Lakers were pissed as they wanted him to replace Phil and Kobe is a big Nate fan.
JVG would be a good hire. He's also funny as hell on tv
If you think Nate has a boring offense...
Nope, he's signed through 2012-13.
The board experts whiffed on this one.
http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/index.ssf/2011/03/trail_blazers_coach_nate_mcmil.html
Back to reading all of the experts' expert opinions.![]()
You're correct. Nate is signed through 2013. Heads are exploding on this board right now.
Thanks for the extra dose of snark. All I remember is Nate saying he wanted to go year to year multiple times. Sorry if I missed something.
You only missed the coach being signed to an extension during the last season. Don't worry about it! Carry on with the pseudo-GM stuff. We're here for entertainment, right?
Earth shattering stuff.
For a pseudo-GM, it's a pretty big miss.
Just saying...
Nope, he's signed through 2012-13.
The board experts whiffed on this one.
http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/index.ssf/2011/03/trail_blazers_coach_nate_mcmil.html
Back to reading all of the experts' expert opinions.![]()
I think part of the function of sports boards is for posters to act like GM's if they want. I'm not sure if one of the board's functions is to rag on people because they made a factual error, what is that about? It seems like it would be easier just to point out the correct facts and be proud of yourself.
I've told you guys over and over that when McMillan's current contract expires, he will have coached the same team 8 years, ranking him 20th in NBA history.
All you had to do was consult the notes you take on my posts, find my 8-year figure, look up the first year he got here (2005), add 8 to that (2013), and subtract that from this year (you can't subtract 2013 minus 2011?). This is what Pritchard had Tom Penn for.
