Jimmy Smith Sig

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
ST34LTH

ST34LTH

NFLC nflcentral.net Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
1,394
Likes
0
Points
36
C+CThanks for the cut, Roscoe!
smile.gif
JSmooth%20copy.png
 
The background is sick dudeVery great job But the pic position is awful and the text looks way too simpleIm waiting for a V2 bro7/10
 
The pic position is fine, but the text is boring. The background could use a little more to it also.
 
Sub text is bad, too thin...Like the BG though, and the pic looks good on it
 
what do you guys mean when you say the text is bad or boring? What could he do to it? Because I think it looks good overall. Nice sig.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (M2D @ Sep 28 2005, 08:51 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>what do you guys mean when you say the text is bad or boring? What could he do to it? Because I think it looks good overall. Nice sig.</div> Thanks. And I agree with you. I dont understand when they say the text is boring. What "effects" could I put on it?Also, i REALLY dont understand when someone said the pic placement is bad? Where in the world do you want me to put him? Africa?
laugh.gif
 
No i just dont like the helmet cut off, maybe put him down a little bit. And a text is boring when its just white thats it and with a boring Times New Roman ish font.
 
bg is yawn. a log belnded into the team primary color and yeah text is boring
 
Maybe he was going for a "boring" sigI think it looks good, just dont like how thin the subtext is
 
Good sig,who cares about the text it dont have to be so cool that you cant read it.
 
I don't think they know that the bg is not an "easy" bg to make. About the text, I don't think anything but a sans or sans-serif font would look good. Imagine a grunge font=blah, A script font=could be ok but not better, Angry blue=haha you get the drift...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top