RR7
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 18,804
- Likes
- 13,333
- Points
- 113
I could very easily be wrong, but I don't think so. At least many I've seen or heard of first hand, not the ones that get talked about in the news for being outlandish, but most I hear of seem to be due to negligence on the part of the doctor. Either ignoring the available data, not getting data, etc. And I say most. I know there's plenty different.Am I alone in seeing a corollary between this judicial decision and many of the medical malpractice suits? Don't a lot of those arise from a doctor making a reasonable judgment based on available data and simply being wrong?
